在定性研究中使用光激发时的方法学问题的考虑。

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2021-06-10 Epub Date: 2021-02-11 DOI:10.7748/nr.2021.e1729
Sarah Church, Julie Quilter
{"title":"在定性研究中使用光激发时的方法学问题的考虑。","authors":"Sarah Church,&nbsp;Julie Quilter","doi":"10.7748/nr.2021.e1729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of photo-elicitation interviews (PEIs) has increased in popularity across a range of disciplines including healthcare. Although qualitative researchers have embraced PEIs as a creative way to explore people's experiences of their lives and environments, the methodological and practical aspects of using photographs have received little attention in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To discuss the use of PEI techniques, including sourcing and using photographs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors discuss definitions of photo-elicitation, and explore the value of and difference between using photographs taken by the researcher and those taken by participants. They consider methodological issues in the context of a small-scale focus group study that used PEIs to explore young women's conceptualisations of teenage and older motherhood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using photographs in research is far more complex than providing participants with cameras or presenting them with photographs. Researchers must be aware of the potential bias in the choice, selection and sequencing of photographs, as well as the methodological considerations associated with PEIs.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This article highlights the value of using photographs in qualitative research and presents some of the methodological issues that nurse researchers need to consider when designing and conducting research using photographs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consideration of methodological issues when using photo-elicitation in qualitative research.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Church,&nbsp;Julie Quilter\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/nr.2021.e1729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of photo-elicitation interviews (PEIs) has increased in popularity across a range of disciplines including healthcare. Although qualitative researchers have embraced PEIs as a creative way to explore people's experiences of their lives and environments, the methodological and practical aspects of using photographs have received little attention in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To discuss the use of PEI techniques, including sourcing and using photographs.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The authors discuss definitions of photo-elicitation, and explore the value of and difference between using photographs taken by the researcher and those taken by participants. They consider methodological issues in the context of a small-scale focus group study that used PEIs to explore young women's conceptualisations of teenage and older motherhood.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using photographs in research is far more complex than providing participants with cameras or presenting them with photographs. Researchers must be aware of the potential bias in the choice, selection and sequencing of photographs, as well as the methodological considerations associated with PEIs.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This article highlights the value of using photographs in qualitative research and presents some of the methodological issues that nurse researchers need to consider when designing and conducting research using photographs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2021.e1729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:在包括医疗保健在内的一系列学科中,使用启发式照片访谈(PEIs)越来越受欢迎。虽然定性研究人员已经接受了pei作为一种创造性的方式来探索人们的生活和环境的经验,但使用照片的方法和实践方面在文献中很少受到关注。目的:讨论PEI技术的使用,包括寻找和使用照片。讨论:作者讨论了photo-elicitation的定义,并探讨了使用研究者和参与者拍摄的照片的价值和区别。他们在一项小规模焦点小组研究的背景下考虑方法问题,该研究使用PEIs来探讨年轻妇女对少女和大龄母亲的概念。结论:在研究中使用照片远比向参与者提供相机或展示照片要复杂得多。研究人员必须意识到在选择、选择和排序照片时的潜在偏见,以及与pei相关的方法学考虑。对实践的启示:本文强调了在定性研究中使用照片的价值,并提出了一些方法问题,护理研究人员在设计和使用照片进行研究时需要考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consideration of methodological issues when using photo-elicitation in qualitative research.

Background: The use of photo-elicitation interviews (PEIs) has increased in popularity across a range of disciplines including healthcare. Although qualitative researchers have embraced PEIs as a creative way to explore people's experiences of their lives and environments, the methodological and practical aspects of using photographs have received little attention in the literature.

Aim: To discuss the use of PEI techniques, including sourcing and using photographs.

Discussion: The authors discuss definitions of photo-elicitation, and explore the value of and difference between using photographs taken by the researcher and those taken by participants. They consider methodological issues in the context of a small-scale focus group study that used PEIs to explore young women's conceptualisations of teenage and older motherhood.

Conclusion: Using photographs in research is far more complex than providing participants with cameras or presenting them with photographs. Researchers must be aware of the potential bias in the choice, selection and sequencing of photographs, as well as the methodological considerations associated with PEIs.

Implications for practice: This article highlights the value of using photographs in qualitative research and presents some of the methodological issues that nurse researchers need to consider when designing and conducting research using photographs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Theoretical sensitivity and reflexivity in grounded theory. The methodological challenges faced when conducting hydration research in UK care homes. Reflections on being an insider researcher: a study exploring the experiences of men accessing rural mental health services. A reflection on the use of virtual nominal group technique in health policy and research priority consensus studies. A worked example of contextualising and using reflexive thematic analysis in nursing research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1