精神分裂症患者现实生活功能自我评估的准确性。

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2021-02-15 DOI:10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9
Paola Rocca, Claudio Brasso, Cristiana Montemagni, Silvio Bellino, Alessandro Rossi, Alessandro Bertolino, Dino Gibertoni, Eugenio Aguglia, Mario Amore, Ileana Andriola, Antonello Bellomo, Paola Bucci, Antonino Buzzanca, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alessandro Cuomo, Liliana Dell'Osso, Angela Favaro, Giulia Maria Giordano, Carlo Marchesi, Palmiero Monteleone, Lucio Oldani, Maurizio Pompili, Rita Roncone, Rodolfo Rossi, Alberto Siracusano, Antonio Vita, Patrizia Zeppegno, Silvana Galderisi, Mario Maj
{"title":"精神分裂症患者现实生活功能自我评估的准确性。","authors":"Paola Rocca, Claudio Brasso, Cristiana Montemagni, Silvio Bellino, Alessandro Rossi, Alessandro Bertolino, Dino Gibertoni, Eugenio Aguglia, Mario Amore, Ileana Andriola, Antonello Bellomo, Paola Bucci, Antonino Buzzanca, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alessandro Cuomo, Liliana Dell'Osso, Angela Favaro, Giulia Maria Giordano, Carlo Marchesi, Palmiero Monteleone, Lucio Oldani, Maurizio Pompili, Rita Roncone, Rodolfo Rossi, Alberto Siracusano, Antonio Vita, Patrizia Zeppegno, Silvana Galderisi, Mario Maj","doi":"10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients' reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin's concordance correlation, Somers' D, and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients' self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers' in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers' ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia.\",\"authors\":\"Paola Rocca, Claudio Brasso, Cristiana Montemagni, Silvio Bellino, Alessandro Rossi, Alessandro Bertolino, Dino Gibertoni, Eugenio Aguglia, Mario Amore, Ileana Andriola, Antonello Bellomo, Paola Bucci, Antonino Buzzanca, Bernardo Carpiniello, Alessandro Cuomo, Liliana Dell'Osso, Angela Favaro, Giulia Maria Giordano, Carlo Marchesi, Palmiero Monteleone, Lucio Oldani, Maurizio Pompili, Rita Roncone, Rodolfo Rossi, Alberto Siracusano, Antonio Vita, Patrizia Zeppegno, Silvana Galderisi, Mario Maj\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients' reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin's concordance correlation, Somers' D, and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients' self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers' in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers' ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00140-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

关于精神分裂症患者自我报告其现实生活功能的准确性,尚未达成共识。在一个大型(n = 618)稳定的社区精神分裂症患者队列中,我们试图:(1)检查患者的现实生活功能报告与他们的主要照顾者的报告的一致性;(2)确定哪些患者特征与患者和举报人之间的差异有关。在特定功能水平量表(SLOF)的三个领域(人际关系、日常生活技能、工作技能)中,采用配对t检验、Lin’s一致性相关、Somers’D和具有一致性限制(LOA)的Bland-Altman图来评估患者与照顾者的一致性。用多变量分数多项式线性回归评估患者-护理者SLOF评分差异的预测因子。患者的功能自我评价在SLOF的所有评价域中均高于照顾者,17.6%的患者超过了LOA,显示出其主要照顾者的自我评价不一致。患者-照顾者差异的最强预测因子是照顾者在每个SLOF领域的评分。在临床稳定且有中度功能障碍的门诊患者中,使用SLOF量表进行自我评估可以成为设计量身定制的康复方案的有用、信息丰富和可靠的临床工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia.

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients' reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin's concordance correlation, Somers' D, and Bland-Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients' self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers' in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers' ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Decreased levels of phosphorylated synuclein in plasma are correlated with poststroke cognitive impairment. Small molecule inhibitor DDQ-treated hippocampal neuronal cells show improved neurite outgrowth and synaptic branching. Polyethylene glycol fusion repair of severed sciatic nerves accelerates recovery of nociceptive sensory perceptions in male and female rats of different strains. Reduced mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor expression by mutant androgen receptor contributes to neurodegeneration in a model of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy pathology. Enhanced autophagic clearance of amyloid-β via histone deacetylase 6-mediated V-ATPase assembly and lysosomal acidification protects against Alzheimer's disease in vitro and in vivo.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1