前交叉韧带重建的胫骨移植物固定方法:文献回顾。

IF 4.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Knee Surgery & Related Research Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0
Vitor Luis Pereira, João Victor Medeiros, Gilvan Rodrigues Silva Nunes, Gabriel Taniguti de Oliveira, Alexandre Pedro Nicolini
{"title":"前交叉韧带重建的胫骨移植物固定方法:文献回顾。","authors":"Vitor Luis Pereira,&nbsp;João Victor Medeiros,&nbsp;Gilvan Rodrigues Silva Nunes,&nbsp;Gabriel Taniguti de Oliveira,&nbsp;Alexandre Pedro Nicolini","doi":"10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the most performed orthopedic surgical procedure. The result of ACL reconstructions depends on multiple technical variables, including tension to be applied to the graft for fixation, knee-flexion angle during fixation and the type of fixation to the bone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carry out a survey of the literature with the best evidence on these themes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature review about methods of tibial-graft fixation in ACL reconstructions - tension applied at the time of fixation, type of graft fixation, and knee-flexion degree during tibial fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies on the selected topics were found. Most studies point to graft-tension levels close to 90 N to obtain the best results. Regarding the knee-flexion angle, multiple studies suggest that fixation at a 30° angle would bring superior biomechanical advantages. Regarding the type of implant for fixation, it is not possible to affirm the superiority of one method over another in clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no consensus on the best method for tibial fixation of the grafts in ACL reconstructions regarding tension, type of implant and knee-flexion angle. However, the analysis of the studies pointed to certain trends and allowed the drawing of specific conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17886,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","volume":"33 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tibial-graft fixation methods on anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Vitor Luis Pereira,&nbsp;João Victor Medeiros,&nbsp;Gilvan Rodrigues Silva Nunes,&nbsp;Gabriel Taniguti de Oliveira,&nbsp;Alexandre Pedro Nicolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the most performed orthopedic surgical procedure. The result of ACL reconstructions depends on multiple technical variables, including tension to be applied to the graft for fixation, knee-flexion angle during fixation and the type of fixation to the bone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To carry out a survey of the literature with the best evidence on these themes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature review about methods of tibial-graft fixation in ACL reconstructions - tension applied at the time of fixation, type of graft fixation, and knee-flexion degree during tibial fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies on the selected topics were found. Most studies point to graft-tension levels close to 90 N to obtain the best results. Regarding the knee-flexion angle, multiple studies suggest that fixation at a 30° angle would bring superior biomechanical advantages. Regarding the type of implant for fixation, it is not possible to affirm the superiority of one method over another in clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is no consensus on the best method for tibial fixation of the grafts in ACL reconstructions regarding tension, type of implant and knee-flexion angle. However, the analysis of the studies pointed to certain trends and allowed the drawing of specific conclusions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery & Related Research\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery & Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery & Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-021-00089-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

前言:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是最常用的骨科手术。前交叉韧带重建的结果取决于多个技术变量,包括用于固定移植物的张力,固定时膝关节屈曲角度和骨固定类型。目的:对这些主题最具说服力的文献进行调查。方法:对前交叉韧带重建中胫骨-移植物固定的方法进行综述,包括固定时施加的张力、移植物固定的类型和胫骨固定时膝关节屈曲的程度。结果:针对所选主题共找到30篇研究。大多数研究指出,接枝张力水平接近90 N才能获得最佳结果。关于膝关节屈曲角度,多项研究表明,以30°角度固定会带来更好的生物力学优势。关于固定种植体的类型,在临床结果上不能肯定一种方法优于另一种方法。结论:前交叉韧带重建中植骨的最佳胫骨固定方法在张力、植骨类型和膝关节屈曲角度等方面尚无共识。但是,对这些研究的分析指出了某些趋势,从而可以得出具体的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tibial-graft fixation methods on anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a literature review.

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the most performed orthopedic surgical procedure. The result of ACL reconstructions depends on multiple technical variables, including tension to be applied to the graft for fixation, knee-flexion angle during fixation and the type of fixation to the bone.

Objective: To carry out a survey of the literature with the best evidence on these themes.

Methods: Literature review about methods of tibial-graft fixation in ACL reconstructions - tension applied at the time of fixation, type of graft fixation, and knee-flexion degree during tibial fixation.

Results: Thirty studies on the selected topics were found. Most studies point to graft-tension levels close to 90 N to obtain the best results. Regarding the knee-flexion angle, multiple studies suggest that fixation at a 30° angle would bring superior biomechanical advantages. Regarding the type of implant for fixation, it is not possible to affirm the superiority of one method over another in clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: There is no consensus on the best method for tibial fixation of the grafts in ACL reconstructions regarding tension, type of implant and knee-flexion angle. However, the analysis of the studies pointed to certain trends and allowed the drawing of specific conclusions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of radiographic factors affecting the significant differences in knee alignment between hip-to-talus and hip-to-calcaneus radiographs after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy Ramp lesion in anterior cruciate ligament injury: a review of the anatomy, biomechanics, epidemiology, and diagnosis. Total knee arthroplasty in dialysis patients: a national in-patient sample-based study of perioperative complications. Does body mass index influence improvement in patient reported outcomes following total knee arthroplasty? A retrospective analysis of 3918 cases. Home ownership, full-time employment, and other markers of higher socioeconomic status are predictive of shorter time to initial evaluation, shorter time to surgery, and superior postoperative outcomes among lateral patellar instability patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1