大多数美国人更喜欢有限的网络,而不是更低的医疗成本。

Capitation management report Pub Date : 2005-08-01
{"title":"大多数美国人更喜欢有限的网络,而不是更低的医疗成本。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A majority of Americans, including those with chronic conditions, are willing to limit their choice of physicians and hospitals in exchange for lower out-of-pocket costs. How are employers and health plans responding to provider backlash?</p>","PeriodicalId":79817,"journal":{"name":"Capitation management report","volume":"12 8","pages":"92-5, 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Most Americans prefer limited networks to lower health care costs.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A majority of Americans, including those with chronic conditions, are willing to limit their choice of physicians and hospitals in exchange for lower out-of-pocket costs. How are employers and health plans responding to provider backlash?</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Capitation management report\",\"volume\":\"12 8\",\"pages\":\"92-5, 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Capitation management report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capitation management report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数美国人,包括那些患有慢性病的人,都愿意限制他们对医生和医院的选择,以换取更低的自付费用。雇主和医疗计划如何应对医疗服务提供者的反弹?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Most Americans prefer limited networks to lower health care costs.

A majority of Americans, including those with chronic conditions, are willing to limit their choice of physicians and hospitals in exchange for lower out-of-pocket costs. How are employers and health plans responding to provider backlash?

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sharp uses integrated approach to stay profitably at-risk. Advocate Health Care delivers quality under capitation. HealthCare Partners works with hospitals to control utilization. Medicaid programs turn to managed care and capitation to control costs. Wellpoint, HealthNet and Prudential settle capitation lawsuit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1