[右心室起搏:资源还是威胁?]。

Gianfranco Ciaramitaro, Giuseppe Sgarito, Michele Farinella, Pierpaolo Prestifilippo, Pasquale Assennato, Salvatore Novo
{"title":"[右心室起搏:资源还是威胁?]。","authors":"Gianfranco Ciaramitaro,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sgarito,&nbsp;Michele Farinella,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Prestifilippo,&nbsp;Pasquale Assennato,&nbsp;Salvatore Novo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early after the beginning of the pacemaker era, endocardial right ventricular apex has been the most extensively used site for cardiac pacing because it was easily accessible and reliable in a long-term perspective. However many data have demonstrated that this kind of pacing is suboptimal from a physiologic point of view because it causes several adverse effects such as altered ventricular contraction geometry, mitral regurgitation, perfusion alterations and interference with myocardial ion channels which determine a worsening of left ventricular function. Several strategies have been proposed to solve these problems (alternative pacing sites, specific algorithms able to reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing) which are still under evaluation. In this review we analyzed the effects of right apical ventricular pacing and its possible alternatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":80290,"journal":{"name":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Right ventricular pacing: a resource or a threat?].\",\"authors\":\"Gianfranco Ciaramitaro,&nbsp;Giuseppe Sgarito,&nbsp;Michele Farinella,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Prestifilippo,&nbsp;Pasquale Assennato,&nbsp;Salvatore Novo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Early after the beginning of the pacemaker era, endocardial right ventricular apex has been the most extensively used site for cardiac pacing because it was easily accessible and reliable in a long-term perspective. However many data have demonstrated that this kind of pacing is suboptimal from a physiologic point of view because it causes several adverse effects such as altered ventricular contraction geometry, mitral regurgitation, perfusion alterations and interference with myocardial ion channels which determine a worsening of left ventricular function. Several strategies have been proposed to solve these problems (alternative pacing sites, specific algorithms able to reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing) which are still under evaluation. In this review we analyzed the effects of right apical ventricular pacing and its possible alternatives.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian heart journal. Supplement : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

早在起搏器时代开始后,心内膜右室心尖就已成为心脏起搏最广泛使用的位置,因为它易于获取且长期可靠。然而,许多数据表明,从生理学的角度来看,这种起搏是次优的,因为它会导致一些不利影响,如心室收缩几何形状改变、二尖瓣反流、灌注改变和心肌离子通道干扰,这些都决定了左心室功能的恶化。已经提出了几种策略来解决这些问题(替代起搏地点,能够降低心室起搏百分比的特定算法),这些策略仍在评估中。在这篇综述中,我们分析了右心尖室起搏的作用及其可能的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Right ventricular pacing: a resource or a threat?].

Early after the beginning of the pacemaker era, endocardial right ventricular apex has been the most extensively used site for cardiac pacing because it was easily accessible and reliable in a long-term perspective. However many data have demonstrated that this kind of pacing is suboptimal from a physiologic point of view because it causes several adverse effects such as altered ventricular contraction geometry, mitral regurgitation, perfusion alterations and interference with myocardial ion channels which determine a worsening of left ventricular function. Several strategies have been proposed to solve these problems (alternative pacing sites, specific algorithms able to reduce the percentage of ventricular pacing) which are still under evaluation. In this review we analyzed the effects of right apical ventricular pacing and its possible alternatives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Italian national register of major coronary events: attack rates and fatality in different areas of the country]. [Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and cardiovascular prevention: more than twenty years of clinical success]. [Atrial fibrillation and cardioversion: role of transesophageal echocardiography]. [Economic impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. Available evidence and evaluation of the CRT-Eucomed model for analysis of cost-effectiveness]. [Impact of reperfusion strategies on in-hospital outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a context of interhospital network: data from the prospective VENERE registry (VENEto acute myocardial infarction REgistry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1