医疗保健技术开发与评估中的用户参与:结构化文献综述。

Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, Ian Robinson
{"title":"医疗保健技术开发与评估中的用户参与:结构化文献综述。","authors":"Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah,&nbsp;Ian Robinson","doi":"10.1108/09526860610687619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical device users are one of the principal medical device technology stakeholders. The involvement of users in medical device technology development and assessment is central to meet their needs. This study aims to examine this issue.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A structured review of the literature published from 1980 to 2005 in peer-reviewed journals was carried out from a social science perspective to investigate user involvement practice in the development and assessment of medical device technologies. This was followed by a qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Medical device users include clinicians, patients, carers and others. Different kinds of medical devices are developed and assessed by user involvement. The user involvement occurs at different stages of the medical device technology lifecycle and the degree of user involvement is in the order of: design > testing and trials > deployment > concept stages. The methods most commonly used for capturing users' perspectives are usability tests, interviews and questionnaire surveys.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>The relevant engineering, medical and nursing literature, which might have been useful, was not reviewed. However, useful findings emerge that apply to health care generally.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study shows that medical device users are not homogeneous but heterogeneous in several aspects, such as needs, skills and working environments. This is an important consideration for incorporating users' perspectives in medical device technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":80009,"journal":{"name":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","volume":"19 6-7","pages":"500-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860610687619","citationCount":"151","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah,&nbsp;Ian Robinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/09526860610687619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Medical device users are one of the principal medical device technology stakeholders. The involvement of users in medical device technology development and assessment is central to meet their needs. This study aims to examine this issue.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>A structured review of the literature published from 1980 to 2005 in peer-reviewed journals was carried out from a social science perspective to investigate user involvement practice in the development and assessment of medical device technologies. This was followed by a qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Medical device users include clinicians, patients, carers and others. Different kinds of medical devices are developed and assessed by user involvement. The user involvement occurs at different stages of the medical device technology lifecycle and the degree of user involvement is in the order of: design > testing and trials > deployment > concept stages. The methods most commonly used for capturing users' perspectives are usability tests, interviews and questionnaire surveys.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>The relevant engineering, medical and nursing literature, which might have been useful, was not reviewed. However, useful findings emerge that apply to health care generally.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This study shows that medical device users are not homogeneous but heterogeneous in several aspects, such as needs, skills and working environments. This is an important consideration for incorporating users' perspectives in medical device technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services\",\"volume\":\"19 6-7\",\"pages\":\"500-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/09526860610687619\",\"citationCount\":\"151\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860610687619\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09526860610687619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 151

摘要

目的:医疗器械使用者是医疗器械技术的主要利益相关者之一。用户参与医疗器械技术的开发和评估对于满足他们的需求至关重要。本研究旨在探讨这一问题。设计/方法/方法:从社会科学的角度对1980年至2005年在同行评议期刊上发表的文献进行了结构化审查,以调查医疗器械技术开发和评估中的用户参与实践。随后进行了定性专题分析。研究结果:医疗器械使用者包括临床医生、患者、护理人员和其他人。不同种类的医疗设备是由用户参与开发和评估的。用户参与发生在医疗器械技术生命周期的不同阶段,用户参与程度依次为:设计阶段>测试试验阶段>部署阶段>概念阶段。获取用户观点最常用的方法是可用性测试、访谈和问卷调查。研究局限性/影响:相关的工程、医学和护理文献可能有用,但没有进行审查。然而,出现了适用于一般医疗保健的有用发现。独创性/价值:本研究表明,医疗器械使用者在需求、技能和工作环境等几个方面不是同质的,而是异质的。这是将用户的观点纳入医疗设备技术的一个重要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.

Purpose: Medical device users are one of the principal medical device technology stakeholders. The involvement of users in medical device technology development and assessment is central to meet their needs. This study aims to examine this issue.

Design/methodology/approach: A structured review of the literature published from 1980 to 2005 in peer-reviewed journals was carried out from a social science perspective to investigate user involvement practice in the development and assessment of medical device technologies. This was followed by a qualitative thematic analysis.

Findings: Medical device users include clinicians, patients, carers and others. Different kinds of medical devices are developed and assessed by user involvement. The user involvement occurs at different stages of the medical device technology lifecycle and the degree of user involvement is in the order of: design > testing and trials > deployment > concept stages. The methods most commonly used for capturing users' perspectives are usability tests, interviews and questionnaire surveys.

Research limitations/implications: The relevant engineering, medical and nursing literature, which might have been useful, was not reviewed. However, useful findings emerge that apply to health care generally.

Originality/value: This study shows that medical device users are not homogeneous but heterogeneous in several aspects, such as needs, skills and working environments. This is an important consideration for incorporating users' perspectives in medical device technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patient-centredness. The implications of management by walking about: a case study of a German hospital. British out-of-hours primary and community care: a review of the literature. An analysis of international health care logistics: the benefits and implications of implementing just-in-time systems in the health care industry. The barriers to patient-driven treatment in mental health: why patients may choose to follow their own path.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1