初次内窥镜泪囊鼻腔造口术后不需要硅胶管:一项前瞻性随机研究。

Grigori Smirnov, Henri Tuomilehto, Markku Teräsvirta, Juhani Nuutinen, Juha Seppä
{"title":"初次内窥镜泪囊鼻腔造口术后不需要硅胶管:一项前瞻性随机研究。","authors":"Grigori Smirnov,&nbsp;Henri Tuomilehto,&nbsp;Markku Teräsvirta,&nbsp;Juhani Nuutinen,&nbsp;Juha Seppä","doi":"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal obstructions of the nasolacrimal pathway. The benefit of silicone tubing after DCR is still controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six consecutive primary EN-DCR procedures were performed in 42 patients during 2004-2007. The patients were randomized into two study groups according to whether silicone tubing was used or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate after primary EN-DCR was 89%: with silicone tubes it was 78%, and without silicone tubes it was 100%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.049). The follow-up period was 6 months and included three follow-up visits: 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. If inserted, the silicone tubes were removed at the 2-month visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our prospective, randomized study showed that the use of silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR is not necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":72175,"journal":{"name":"American journal of rhinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132","citationCount":"112","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.\",\"authors\":\"Grigori Smirnov,&nbsp;Henri Tuomilehto,&nbsp;Markku Teräsvirta,&nbsp;Juhani Nuutinen,&nbsp;Juha Seppä\",\"doi\":\"10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal obstructions of the nasolacrimal pathway. The benefit of silicone tubing after DCR is still controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-six consecutive primary EN-DCR procedures were performed in 42 patients during 2004-2007. The patients were randomized into two study groups according to whether silicone tubing was used or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall success rate after primary EN-DCR was 89%: with silicone tubes it was 78%, and without silicone tubes it was 100%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.049). The follow-up period was 6 months and included three follow-up visits: 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. If inserted, the silicone tubes were removed at the 2-month visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our prospective, randomized study showed that the use of silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR is not necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132\",\"citationCount\":\"112\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of rhinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 112

摘要

背景:内窥镜下泪囊鼻腔造口术(EN-DCR)是治疗鼻泪道囊及囊后阻塞的有效方法。硅胶管DCR后的效益仍有争议。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,以评估原发性EN-DCR后双管硅胶管的必要性。方法:2004-2007年间,42例患者连续行46例EN-DCR手术。根据是否使用硅胶管将患者随机分为两个研究组。结果:一期EN-DCR的总成功率为89%,其中硅胶管组为78%,无硅胶管组为100%。结论:我们的前瞻性随机研究结果显示,EN-DCR术后没有必要使用硅胶管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Silicone tubing is not necessary after primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: a prospective randomized study.

Background: Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) is an effective procedure when treating saccal and postsaccal obstructions of the nasolacrimal pathway. The benefit of silicone tubing after DCR is still controversial. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR.

Methods: Forty-six consecutive primary EN-DCR procedures were performed in 42 patients during 2004-2007. The patients were randomized into two study groups according to whether silicone tubing was used or not.

Results: The overall success rate after primary EN-DCR was 89%: with silicone tubes it was 78%, and without silicone tubes it was 100%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (p<0.049). The follow-up period was 6 months and included three follow-up visits: 1 week, 2 months, and 6 months postoperatively. If inserted, the silicone tubes were removed at the 2-month visit.

Conclusion: The results of our prospective, randomized study showed that the use of silicone tubes after primary EN-DCR is not necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perspectives on the etiology of chronic rhinosinusitis: an immune barrier hypothesis. Comparison of laryngeal mask with endotracheal tube for anesthesia in endoscopic sinus surgery. The effect of nasal surgery on snoring. Results of endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy in recalcitrant maxillary sinusitis. The efficacy of topical antibiofilm agents in a sheep model of rhinosinusitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1