预测模型和预后指标评估临床相关盆腔器官脱垂在一般女性人群。

Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove, Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard, Marinus J C Eijkemans, Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen, Curt W Burger, Mark E Vierhout
{"title":"预测模型和预后指标评估临床相关盆腔器官脱垂在一般女性人群。","authors":"Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove,&nbsp;Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard,&nbsp;Marinus J C Eijkemans,&nbsp;Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen,&nbsp;Curt W Burger,&nbsp;Mark E Vierhout","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Estimation on prevalence and distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) signs in a general female population is difficult. We therefore developed and validated a prediction model and prognostic instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were sent to a general female population (45-85 years). A random sample underwent vaginal examination for POP (POPQ). A prediction model was developed using multivariate analysis and validated in a subgroup of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive questionnaire-response rate was 46.8% (1,397 of 2,979). From the questionnaire group, 649 women were vaginally examined (46.5%). Prevalence of clinically relevant POP was 21%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios on the report of vaginal bulging, parity > or = 2 and a mother with POP. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed areas under the curve of 0.672 and 0.640.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of POP at or beyond the hymen could be estimated in a general female population using our prediction model with 17 questions and our POP score chart with eight questions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 9","pages":"1013-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population.\",\"authors\":\"Marijke C Ph Slieker-ten Hove,&nbsp;Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard,&nbsp;Marinus J C Eijkemans,&nbsp;Regine P M Steegers-Theunissen,&nbsp;Curt W Burger,&nbsp;Mark E Vierhout\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>Estimation on prevalence and distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) signs in a general female population is difficult. We therefore developed and validated a prediction model and prognostic instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questionnaires were sent to a general female population (45-85 years). A random sample underwent vaginal examination for POP (POPQ). A prediction model was developed using multivariate analysis and validated in a subgroup of participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive questionnaire-response rate was 46.8% (1,397 of 2,979). From the questionnaire group, 649 women were vaginally examined (46.5%). Prevalence of clinically relevant POP was 21%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios on the report of vaginal bulging, parity > or = 2 and a mother with POP. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed areas under the curve of 0.672 and 0.640.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of POP at or beyond the hymen could be estimated in a general female population using our prediction model with 17 questions and our POP score chart with eight questions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"1013-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0903-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

前言和假设:估计骨盆器官脱垂(POP)体征在一般女性人群中的患病率和分布是困难的。因此,我们开发并验证了预测模型和预后工具。方法:对普通女性(45-85岁)进行问卷调查。随机抽样进行阴道POP检查(POPQ)。采用多变量分析建立预测模型,并在一组参与者中进行验证。结果:2979例问卷调查中,阳性应答率为46.8%(1397例)。在问卷组中,649名女性接受了阴道检查(46.5%)。临床相关的POP患病率为21%。多变量分析显示阴道膨出、胎次>或= 2和母亲患有POP的比值比显著升高。受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.672和0.640。结论:我们的预测模型包含17个问题,我们的POP计分表包含8个问题,可以在普通女性人群中估计出位于处女膜或处女膜外的POP患病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction model and prognostic index to estimate clinically relevant pelvic organ prolapse in a general female population.

Introduction and hypothesis: Estimation on prevalence and distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) signs in a general female population is difficult. We therefore developed and validated a prediction model and prognostic instrument.

Methods: Questionnaires were sent to a general female population (45-85 years). A random sample underwent vaginal examination for POP (POPQ). A prediction model was developed using multivariate analysis and validated in a subgroup of participants.

Results: Positive questionnaire-response rate was 46.8% (1,397 of 2,979). From the questionnaire group, 649 women were vaginally examined (46.5%). Prevalence of clinically relevant POP was 21%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds ratios on the report of vaginal bulging, parity > or = 2 and a mother with POP. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed areas under the curve of 0.672 and 0.640.

Conclusions: The prevalence of POP at or beyond the hymen could be estimated in a general female population using our prediction model with 17 questions and our POP score chart with eight questions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overactive bladder: a new paradigm. Case of longitudinal vaginal septum with pelvic organ prolapse. Fistulization between ectopic ureteral stump and uterus following nephroureterectomy: case report. Accidental introduction of a contraceptive vaginal ring into the urinary bladder. Vesical endometriosis following the menopause.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1