Charles W Nager, Holly E Richter, Ingrid Nygaard, Marie Fidela Paraiso, Jennifer M Wu, Kimberly Kenton, Shanna D Atnip, Cathie Spino
{"title":"尿失禁托托:尺寸,POPQ测量,和成功的装配。","authors":"Charles W Nager, Holly E Richter, Ingrid Nygaard, Marie Fidela Paraiso, Jennifer M Wu, Kimberly Kenton, Shanna D Atnip, Cathie Spino","doi":"10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine whether successful incontinence pessary fitting or pessary size can be predicted by specific POPQ measurements in women without advanced pelvic organ prolapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicenter study, women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and POPQ stage < or = 2 were randomized to three treatment arms: (1) incontinence pessary, (2) behavioral therapy, or (3) both. This study evaluates incontinence pessary size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting in the 266 women assigned to treatment arms 1 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five women (92%) were successfully fitted with an incontinence ring (n = 122) or dish (n = 113). Hysterectomy, genital hiatus (GH), and GH/total vaginal length (TVL) ratios did not predict unsuccessful fitting (p > 0.05). However, mean TVL was greater in women successfully fitted (9.6 vs. 8.8 cm, p < 0.01). Final pessary diameter was not predicted by TVL, point D, or point C (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vast majority of women with SUI can be successfully fitted with an incontinence pessary, but specific POPQ measures were not helpful in determining incontinence pessary size.</p>","PeriodicalId":73495,"journal":{"name":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","volume":"20 9","pages":"1023-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting.\",\"authors\":\"Charles W Nager, Holly E Richter, Ingrid Nygaard, Marie Fidela Paraiso, Jennifer M Wu, Kimberly Kenton, Shanna D Atnip, Cathie Spino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The aim of the study was to determine whether successful incontinence pessary fitting or pessary size can be predicted by specific POPQ measurements in women without advanced pelvic organ prolapse.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicenter study, women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and POPQ stage < or = 2 were randomized to three treatment arms: (1) incontinence pessary, (2) behavioral therapy, or (3) both. This study evaluates incontinence pessary size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting in the 266 women assigned to treatment arms 1 and 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred thirty-five women (92%) were successfully fitted with an incontinence ring (n = 122) or dish (n = 113). Hysterectomy, genital hiatus (GH), and GH/total vaginal length (TVL) ratios did not predict unsuccessful fitting (p > 0.05). However, mean TVL was greater in women successfully fitted (9.6 vs. 8.8 cm, p < 0.01). Final pessary diameter was not predicted by TVL, point D, or point C (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The vast majority of women with SUI can be successfully fitted with an incontinence pessary, but specific POPQ measures were not helpful in determining incontinence pessary size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"1023-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2009/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0866-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
摘要
前言和假设:本研究的目的是确定在没有晚期盆腔器官脱垂的女性中,是否可以通过特定的POPQ测量来预测成功的尿失禁子宫托安装或子宫托大小。方法:在一项多中心研究中,压力性尿失禁(SUI)和POPQ分期<或= 2的女性被随机分为三个治疗组:(1)强制性尿失禁,(2)行为治疗,或(3)两者兼用。本研究评估了266名被分配到治疗组1和3的妇女的尿失禁必要尺寸、POPQ测量和成功拟合。结果:235名妇女(92%)成功安装了失禁环(n = 122)或盘子(n = 113)。子宫切除术、生殖器间隙(GH)和GH/阴道总长度(TVL)比值不能预测拟合失败(p > 0.05)。然而,成功贴合的女性平均TVL更大(9.6比8.8 cm, p < 0.01)。TVL、D点或C点不能预测最终的子宫托直径(p > 0.05)。结论:绝大多数SUI女性可以成功安装失禁尿托,但具体的POPQ测量方法对确定失禁尿托的大小没有帮助。
Incontinence pessaries: size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting.
Introduction and hypothesis: The aim of the study was to determine whether successful incontinence pessary fitting or pessary size can be predicted by specific POPQ measurements in women without advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Methods: In a multicenter study, women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and POPQ stage < or = 2 were randomized to three treatment arms: (1) incontinence pessary, (2) behavioral therapy, or (3) both. This study evaluates incontinence pessary size, POPQ measures, and successful fitting in the 266 women assigned to treatment arms 1 and 3.
Results: Two hundred thirty-five women (92%) were successfully fitted with an incontinence ring (n = 122) or dish (n = 113). Hysterectomy, genital hiatus (GH), and GH/total vaginal length (TVL) ratios did not predict unsuccessful fitting (p > 0.05). However, mean TVL was greater in women successfully fitted (9.6 vs. 8.8 cm, p < 0.01). Final pessary diameter was not predicted by TVL, point D, or point C (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The vast majority of women with SUI can be successfully fitted with an incontinence pessary, but specific POPQ measures were not helpful in determining incontinence pessary size.