健康受试者不同足位站立和躺姿时的内外侧腓肠肌h反射间歇可靠性。

H N Alrowayeh, M A Sabbahi
{"title":"健康受试者不同足位站立和躺姿时的内外侧腓肠肌h反射间歇可靠性。","authors":"H N Alrowayeh,&nbsp;M A Sabbahi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Available H-reflex procedures do not allow a reliable or valid examination for the L5 radiculopathy. However, recording the gastrocnemius H-reflex may allow a reliable and valid method for examination of the L5 nerve root. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the intersession reliability of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) H-reflexes recordings during standing and lying postures at varied ankle positions in healthy participants. The MG and LG H-reflexes of eight healthy participants were elicited by stimulating the tibial nerve and recording the resultant muscle response using surface electrodes. The stimulation parameters were 1.0 ms, 0.2 PPS, with incremented stimulus intensity. Four traces of the maximum amplitude H-reflex and M-wave were recorded during lying and standing with the ankle in neutral, full dorsiflexion, and full plantarflexion over two consecutive days. The averaged traces were used to calculate the intersession intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) among conditions. Intersession ICCs (2, 1) of MG and LG during standing and lying with varied ankle positions were moderate to high (ranging from 0.58 to 0.94). The MG was more stable than LG and the ICCs were greater during standing (ranging from 0.76 to 0.94) than during lying (ranging from 0.58 to 0.85), indicating higher sensitivity of the MG H-reflex when the limb is engaged in functional standing However, the LG H-reflex reliability was robust and, thus, could be recorded consistently in the examination of the L5 nerve root.</p>","PeriodicalId":11591,"journal":{"name":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","volume":"49 4","pages":"143-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medial and lateral gastrocnemius H-reflex intersession reliability during standing and lying postures at varied foot positions in healthy participants.\",\"authors\":\"H N Alrowayeh,&nbsp;M A Sabbahi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Available H-reflex procedures do not allow a reliable or valid examination for the L5 radiculopathy. However, recording the gastrocnemius H-reflex may allow a reliable and valid method for examination of the L5 nerve root. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the intersession reliability of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) H-reflexes recordings during standing and lying postures at varied ankle positions in healthy participants. The MG and LG H-reflexes of eight healthy participants were elicited by stimulating the tibial nerve and recording the resultant muscle response using surface electrodes. The stimulation parameters were 1.0 ms, 0.2 PPS, with incremented stimulus intensity. Four traces of the maximum amplitude H-reflex and M-wave were recorded during lying and standing with the ankle in neutral, full dorsiflexion, and full plantarflexion over two consecutive days. The averaged traces were used to calculate the intersession intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) among conditions. Intersession ICCs (2, 1) of MG and LG during standing and lying with varied ankle positions were moderate to high (ranging from 0.58 to 0.94). The MG was more stable than LG and the ICCs were greater during standing (ranging from 0.76 to 0.94) than during lying (ranging from 0.58 to 0.85), indicating higher sensitivity of the MG H-reflex when the limb is engaged in functional standing However, the LG H-reflex reliability was robust and, thus, could be recorded consistently in the examination of the L5 nerve root.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"143-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的h反射检查不能对L5神经根病进行可靠或有效的检查。然而,记录腓肠肌h反射可以为检查L5神经根提供可靠和有效的方法。因此,本研究的目的是检验健康参与者在不同踝关节位置站立和躺姿时,内侧腓肠肌(MG)和外侧腓肠肌(LG) h -反射记录的间歇可靠性。通过刺激胫骨神经,并使用表面电极记录由此产生的肌肉反应,诱发了8名健康参与者的MG和LG h反射。刺激参数为1.0 ms, 0.2 PPS,刺激强度逐渐增加。在连续两天内,分别在踝关节处于中立、完全背屈和完全跖屈的情况下,记录躺卧和站立时最大振幅h反射和m波的四条轨迹。平均迹线用于计算各条件间的类内相关系数(ICC)。不同踝关节位置站立和躺卧时MG和LG的间歇ICCs(2,1)从中到高(0.58 ~ 0.94)。MG比LG更稳定,站立时的ICCs(0.76 ~ 0.94)比躺着时的ICCs(0.58 ~ 0.85)更大,表明肢体进行功能性站立时MG h反射的灵敏度更高。然而,LG h反射的可靠性较强,因此可以在L5神经根检查中一致记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medial and lateral gastrocnemius H-reflex intersession reliability during standing and lying postures at varied foot positions in healthy participants.

Available H-reflex procedures do not allow a reliable or valid examination for the L5 radiculopathy. However, recording the gastrocnemius H-reflex may allow a reliable and valid method for examination of the L5 nerve root. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the intersession reliability of the medial gastrocnemius (MG) and lateral gastrocnemius (LG) H-reflexes recordings during standing and lying postures at varied ankle positions in healthy participants. The MG and LG H-reflexes of eight healthy participants were elicited by stimulating the tibial nerve and recording the resultant muscle response using surface electrodes. The stimulation parameters were 1.0 ms, 0.2 PPS, with incremented stimulus intensity. Four traces of the maximum amplitude H-reflex and M-wave were recorded during lying and standing with the ankle in neutral, full dorsiflexion, and full plantarflexion over two consecutive days. The averaged traces were used to calculate the intersession intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) among conditions. Intersession ICCs (2, 1) of MG and LG during standing and lying with varied ankle positions were moderate to high (ranging from 0.58 to 0.94). The MG was more stable than LG and the ICCs were greater during standing (ranging from 0.76 to 0.94) than during lying (ranging from 0.58 to 0.85), indicating higher sensitivity of the MG H-reflex when the limb is engaged in functional standing However, the LG H-reflex reliability was robust and, thus, could be recorded consistently in the examination of the L5 nerve root.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of gender on the EMG signal of the quadriceps femoris muscles and performance in high-intensity short-term exercise. Activity and asymmetry index of masticatory muscles in women with and without dysfunction temporomandibular. Scientific basis for learning transfer from movements to urinary bladder functions for bladder repair in human patients with CNS injury. Common peroneal and tibial nerve paralysis secondary to herpes zoster infection: a case report. The effect of provocative tests on electrodiagnosis criteria in clinical carpal tunnel syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1