急性咳嗽:诊断和治疗的挑战。

Peter V Dicpinigaitis, Gene L Colice, Mary Jo Goolsby, Gary I Rogg, Sheldon L Spector, Birgit Winther
{"title":"急性咳嗽:诊断和治疗的挑战。","authors":"Peter V Dicpinigaitis,&nbsp;Gene L Colice,&nbsp;Mary Jo Goolsby,&nbsp;Gary I Rogg,&nbsp;Sheldon L Spector,&nbsp;Birgit Winther","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-5-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute cough is one of the most common complaints prompting patient visits to healthcare professionals. Despite the broad repercussions of acute cough on patient quality of life, school and work productivity, and public health resources, research on this condition is minimal, as are the available treatment options. Many patients use over-the-counter medicines, which are often ineffective for symptom relief. Some therapies may achieve antitussive activity, but at the expense of unpleasant or intolerable side effects.</p><p><strong>Unmet needs: </strong>When considering the treatments currently available for the management of acute cough, the multiple limitations of such treatments are quite apparent. Most of these treatments lack clinically proven efficacy and reliability to support their use. This reinforces the need for the generation of quality scientific data from well-performed clinical trials. Hopefully, the result will be the development of safer, more effective and more reliable therapeutic options in the management of acute cough.</p><p><strong>Cough assessment and management: </strong>Acute cough can be due to a variety of causes, and it is worthwhile to consider these pathogenic factors in some detail. It is also important to be familiar with the effects that acute cough has on patients' quality of life, work productivity, and the healthcare system; proper awareness of these effects may contribute to better understanding of the social impact of cough. In reference to the available treatments for the management of acute cough, adequate knowledge of the type of over-the-counter and prescription products in the market, as well as their mode of action and advantages/disadvantages, may provide expanded pharmacotherapeutic opportunities and facilitate better clinical decisions. However, due to the drawbacks of current treatment options, ideas for future cough management and newer products need to be considered and tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In view of the socio-economic impact of acute cough and the limitations of available treatments, a renewed interest in the management of acute cough needs to be encouraged. The current strategies for acute cough management need to be reassessed, with a focus on developing new, reliable products and formulations with proven efficacy and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"5 ","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-5-11","citationCount":"58","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute cough: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.\",\"authors\":\"Peter V Dicpinigaitis,&nbsp;Gene L Colice,&nbsp;Mary Jo Goolsby,&nbsp;Gary I Rogg,&nbsp;Sheldon L Spector,&nbsp;Birgit Winther\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1745-9974-5-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute cough is one of the most common complaints prompting patient visits to healthcare professionals. Despite the broad repercussions of acute cough on patient quality of life, school and work productivity, and public health resources, research on this condition is minimal, as are the available treatment options. Many patients use over-the-counter medicines, which are often ineffective for symptom relief. Some therapies may achieve antitussive activity, but at the expense of unpleasant or intolerable side effects.</p><p><strong>Unmet needs: </strong>When considering the treatments currently available for the management of acute cough, the multiple limitations of such treatments are quite apparent. Most of these treatments lack clinically proven efficacy and reliability to support their use. This reinforces the need for the generation of quality scientific data from well-performed clinical trials. Hopefully, the result will be the development of safer, more effective and more reliable therapeutic options in the management of acute cough.</p><p><strong>Cough assessment and management: </strong>Acute cough can be due to a variety of causes, and it is worthwhile to consider these pathogenic factors in some detail. It is also important to be familiar with the effects that acute cough has on patients' quality of life, work productivity, and the healthcare system; proper awareness of these effects may contribute to better understanding of the social impact of cough. In reference to the available treatments for the management of acute cough, adequate knowledge of the type of over-the-counter and prescription products in the market, as well as their mode of action and advantages/disadvantages, may provide expanded pharmacotherapeutic opportunities and facilitate better clinical decisions. However, due to the drawbacks of current treatment options, ideas for future cough management and newer products need to be considered and tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In view of the socio-economic impact of acute cough and the limitations of available treatments, a renewed interest in the management of acute cough needs to be encouraged. The current strategies for acute cough management need to be reassessed, with a focus on developing new, reliable products and formulations with proven efficacy and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-5-11\",\"citationCount\":\"58\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-5-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-5-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

摘要

背景:急性咳嗽是最常见的主诉之一,促使患者访问医疗保健专业人员。尽管急性咳嗽对患者的生活质量、学习和工作效率以及公共卫生资源产生广泛影响,但对这种疾病的研究很少,可用的治疗方案也很少。许多患者使用非处方药,这些药物往往对缓解症状无效。有些治疗方法可能达到止咳作用,但代价是不愉快或无法忍受的副作用。未满足的需求:考虑到目前可用于治疗急性咳嗽的治疗方法,这些治疗的多重局限性是相当明显的。大多数这些治疗缺乏临床证明的有效性和可靠性来支持其使用。这加强了从执行良好的临床试验中产生高质量科学数据的需求。希望结果将是开发出更安全、更有效和更可靠的治疗方案来管理急性咳嗽。咳嗽的评估和处理:急性咳嗽可能是由多种原因引起的,对这些致病因素进行详细的考虑是值得的。同样重要的是要熟悉急性咳嗽对患者生活质量、工作效率和卫生保健系统的影响;正确认识这些影响可能有助于更好地了解咳嗽的社会影响。就管理急性咳嗽的现有治疗方法而言,充分了解市场上非处方药和处方药的类型,以及它们的作用方式和优点/缺点,可能会提供更多的药物治疗机会,并促进更好的临床决策。然而,由于目前治疗方案的缺点,需要考虑和测试未来咳嗽管理和更新产品的想法。结论:鉴于急性咳嗽的社会经济影响和现有治疗方法的局限性,需要鼓励对急性咳嗽管理的重新关注。需要重新评估目前的急性咳嗽管理战略,重点是开发新的、可靠的、已证实有效和安全的产品和配方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute cough: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

Background: Acute cough is one of the most common complaints prompting patient visits to healthcare professionals. Despite the broad repercussions of acute cough on patient quality of life, school and work productivity, and public health resources, research on this condition is minimal, as are the available treatment options. Many patients use over-the-counter medicines, which are often ineffective for symptom relief. Some therapies may achieve antitussive activity, but at the expense of unpleasant or intolerable side effects.

Unmet needs: When considering the treatments currently available for the management of acute cough, the multiple limitations of such treatments are quite apparent. Most of these treatments lack clinically proven efficacy and reliability to support their use. This reinforces the need for the generation of quality scientific data from well-performed clinical trials. Hopefully, the result will be the development of safer, more effective and more reliable therapeutic options in the management of acute cough.

Cough assessment and management: Acute cough can be due to a variety of causes, and it is worthwhile to consider these pathogenic factors in some detail. It is also important to be familiar with the effects that acute cough has on patients' quality of life, work productivity, and the healthcare system; proper awareness of these effects may contribute to better understanding of the social impact of cough. In reference to the available treatments for the management of acute cough, adequate knowledge of the type of over-the-counter and prescription products in the market, as well as their mode of action and advantages/disadvantages, may provide expanded pharmacotherapeutic opportunities and facilitate better clinical decisions. However, due to the drawbacks of current treatment options, ideas for future cough management and newer products need to be considered and tested.

Conclusion: In view of the socio-economic impact of acute cough and the limitations of available treatments, a renewed interest in the management of acute cough needs to be encouraged. The current strategies for acute cough management need to be reassessed, with a focus on developing new, reliable products and formulations with proven efficacy and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A crossover randomized comparative study of zofenopril and ramipril on cough reflex and airway inflammation in healthy volunteers. Standardized method for solubility and storage of capsaicin-based solutions for cough induction. On the definition of chronic cough and current treatment pathways: an international qualitative study. Effect of acid suppression therapy on gastroesophageal reflux and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an intervention study. Severity of cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is associated with MUC5 B genotype.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1