D(max)用于模拟单视觉校正的立体深度感知。

Jin Qian, Samuel A Adeseye, Scott B Stevenson, Saumil S Patel, Harold E Bedell
{"title":"D(max)用于模拟单视觉校正的立体深度感知。","authors":"Jin Qian,&nbsp;Samuel A Adeseye,&nbsp;Scott B Stevenson,&nbsp;Saumil S Patel,&nbsp;Harold E Bedell","doi":"10.1163/187847511X579043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persons who wear monovision correction typically receive a clear image in one eye and a blurred image in the other eye. Although monovision is known to elevate the minimum stereoscopic threshold (Dmin), it is uncertain how it influences the largest binocular disparity for which the direction of depth can reliably be perceived (Dmax). In this study, we compared Dmax for stereo when one eye's image is blurred to Dmax when both eyes' images are either clear or blurred.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The stimulus was a pair of vertically oriented, random-line patterns. To simulate monovision correction with +1.5 or +2.5 D defocus, the images of the line patterns presented to one eye were spatially low-pass filtered while the patterns presented to the other eye remained unfiltered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to binocular viewing without blur, Dmin is elevated substantially more in the presence of monocular than binocular simulated blur. Dmax is reduced in the presence of simulated monocular blur by between 13 and 44%, compared to when the images in both eyes are clear. In contrast, when the targets presented to both eyes are blurred equally, Dmax either is unchanged or increases slightly, compared to the values measured with no blur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conjunction with the elevation of Dmin, the reduction of Dmax with monocular blur indicates that the range of useful stereoscopic depth perception is likely to be compressed in patients who wear monovision corrections.</p>","PeriodicalId":49553,"journal":{"name":"Seeing and Perceiving","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847511X579043","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"D(max) for stereoscopic depth perception with simulated monovision correction.\",\"authors\":\"Jin Qian,&nbsp;Samuel A Adeseye,&nbsp;Scott B Stevenson,&nbsp;Saumil S Patel,&nbsp;Harold E Bedell\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/187847511X579043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Persons who wear monovision correction typically receive a clear image in one eye and a blurred image in the other eye. Although monovision is known to elevate the minimum stereoscopic threshold (Dmin), it is uncertain how it influences the largest binocular disparity for which the direction of depth can reliably be perceived (Dmax). In this study, we compared Dmax for stereo when one eye's image is blurred to Dmax when both eyes' images are either clear or blurred.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The stimulus was a pair of vertically oriented, random-line patterns. To simulate monovision correction with +1.5 or +2.5 D defocus, the images of the line patterns presented to one eye were spatially low-pass filtered while the patterns presented to the other eye remained unfiltered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to binocular viewing without blur, Dmin is elevated substantially more in the presence of monocular than binocular simulated blur. Dmax is reduced in the presence of simulated monocular blur by between 13 and 44%, compared to when the images in both eyes are clear. In contrast, when the targets presented to both eyes are blurred equally, Dmax either is unchanged or increases slightly, compared to the values measured with no blur.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conjunction with the elevation of Dmin, the reduction of Dmax with monocular blur indicates that the range of useful stereoscopic depth perception is likely to be compressed in patients who wear monovision corrections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/187847511X579043\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seeing and Perceiving\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847511X579043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeing and Perceiving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/187847511X579043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

目的:戴单视矫正器的人通常一只眼睛的图像清晰,另一只眼睛的图像模糊。虽然已知单视可以提高最小立体阈值(Dmin),但不确定它如何影响可以可靠地感知深度方向的最大双目视差(Dmax)。在本研究中,我们比较了单眼图像模糊和双眼图像清晰或模糊时的立体Dmax。方法:刺激是一对垂直方向的随机线图案。为了模拟+1.5或+2.5 D离焦的单视校正,呈现给一只眼睛的线条图案图像进行了空间低通滤波,而呈现给另一只眼睛的图案则保持未滤波。结果:与没有模糊的双眼观看相比,单眼的Dmin明显高于双眼模拟模糊。与两只眼睛都清晰的图像相比,在模拟单眼模糊的情况下,Dmax降低了13%到44%。相比之下,当呈现在两只眼睛面前的目标同样模糊时,与没有模糊的情况相比,Dmax要么保持不变,要么略有增加。结论:在Dmin升高的同时,单眼模糊的Dmax降低表明戴单视矫正的患者有用的立体深度感知范围可能被压缩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
D(max) for stereoscopic depth perception with simulated monovision correction.

Purpose: Persons who wear monovision correction typically receive a clear image in one eye and a blurred image in the other eye. Although monovision is known to elevate the minimum stereoscopic threshold (Dmin), it is uncertain how it influences the largest binocular disparity for which the direction of depth can reliably be perceived (Dmax). In this study, we compared Dmax for stereo when one eye's image is blurred to Dmax when both eyes' images are either clear or blurred.

Methods: The stimulus was a pair of vertically oriented, random-line patterns. To simulate monovision correction with +1.5 or +2.5 D defocus, the images of the line patterns presented to one eye were spatially low-pass filtered while the patterns presented to the other eye remained unfiltered.

Results: Compared to binocular viewing without blur, Dmin is elevated substantially more in the presence of monocular than binocular simulated blur. Dmax is reduced in the presence of simulated monocular blur by between 13 and 44%, compared to when the images in both eyes are clear. In contrast, when the targets presented to both eyes are blurred equally, Dmax either is unchanged or increases slightly, compared to the values measured with no blur.

Conclusion: In conjunction with the elevation of Dmin, the reduction of Dmax with monocular blur indicates that the range of useful stereoscopic depth perception is likely to be compressed in patients who wear monovision corrections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seeing and Perceiving
Seeing and Perceiving BIOPHYSICS-PSYCHOLOGY
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Chapter ten. Color Vision Chapter six. Brightness Constancy Chapter One. Our Idea of the Physical World Chapter nine. Optometrists, Ophthalmologists, Opticians: What They Do Chapter seven. Why the Rate of Unbleaching is Important
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1