乳糖13c -脲醛呼气试验测定马口腔运输时间的体外验证。

D G M Sutton, T Preston, S Love
{"title":"乳糖13c -脲醛呼气试验测定马口腔运输时间的体外验证。","authors":"D G M Sutton,&nbsp;T Preston,&nbsp;S Love","doi":"10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00406.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Reasons for performing study: </strong>Validation of a reliable, noninvasive clinical test for quantification of equine orocaecal transit time (OCTT) is required. This would facilitate an evidence-based approach to investigation and treatment of equine small intestinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Comparison of the lactose (13) C-ureide breath test (LUBT) with the hydrogen breath test (H(2) BT) for OCTT measurement. 2) Identification of the characteristics of gastrointestinal microbial glycosylureide hydrolase activity in vitro. 3) Production of an optimised protocol for the LUBT for in vivo measurement of equine OCTT.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Significant lactose (13) C-ureide ((13) C-LU) hydrolase activity is restricted to the large bowel. The rate of expiratory (13) CO(2) production after ingestion of the isotope will provide an indirect quantifiable measure of orocaecal transit rate. Requisite bacterial activity may be enhanced by a primer dose of unlabelled substrate as shown in Man.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Combined LUBT and H(2) BT were performed in 8 healthy individuals. Analysis of sequential end expiratory breath samples was used to calculate OCTT and results compared. Digestion of (13) C-LU was investigated in vitro using fresh faecal material or intestinal aliquots collected post mortem. Isotopic fermentation rate was measured by rate of appearance of (13) CO(2) .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peaks in expiratory (13) CO(2) occurred in all individuals after ingestion of the labelled test meal, whereas H(2) expiration was variable. Both faecal and intestinal microbial digestion of (13) C-LU were maximised by prior exposure to (12) C-LU. Induced bacterial glucoseureide hydrolase activity was significantly greater in the caecum than in the small intestine (n = 10, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant (13) C-LU digestion is restricted to the equine large intestine under normal conditions, and is enhanced by prior exposure to (12) C-LU, making (13) C-LU a suitable noninvasive marker of equine OCTT. The LUBT is more reliable than the H(2) BT for measurement of equine OCTT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11801,"journal":{"name":"Equine veterinary journal. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00406.x","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro validation of the lactose 13C-ureide breath test for equine orocaecal transit time measurement.\",\"authors\":\"D G M Sutton,&nbsp;T Preston,&nbsp;S Love\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00406.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Reasons for performing study: </strong>Validation of a reliable, noninvasive clinical test for quantification of equine orocaecal transit time (OCTT) is required. This would facilitate an evidence-based approach to investigation and treatment of equine small intestinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>1) Comparison of the lactose (13) C-ureide breath test (LUBT) with the hydrogen breath test (H(2) BT) for OCTT measurement. 2) Identification of the characteristics of gastrointestinal microbial glycosylureide hydrolase activity in vitro. 3) Production of an optimised protocol for the LUBT for in vivo measurement of equine OCTT.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>Significant lactose (13) C-ureide ((13) C-LU) hydrolase activity is restricted to the large bowel. The rate of expiratory (13) CO(2) production after ingestion of the isotope will provide an indirect quantifiable measure of orocaecal transit rate. Requisite bacterial activity may be enhanced by a primer dose of unlabelled substrate as shown in Man.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Combined LUBT and H(2) BT were performed in 8 healthy individuals. Analysis of sequential end expiratory breath samples was used to calculate OCTT and results compared. Digestion of (13) C-LU was investigated in vitro using fresh faecal material or intestinal aliquots collected post mortem. Isotopic fermentation rate was measured by rate of appearance of (13) CO(2) .</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peaks in expiratory (13) CO(2) occurred in all individuals after ingestion of the labelled test meal, whereas H(2) expiration was variable. Both faecal and intestinal microbial digestion of (13) C-LU were maximised by prior exposure to (12) C-LU. Induced bacterial glucoseureide hydrolase activity was significantly greater in the caecum than in the small intestine (n = 10, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant (13) C-LU digestion is restricted to the equine large intestine under normal conditions, and is enhanced by prior exposure to (12) C-LU, making (13) C-LU a suitable noninvasive marker of equine OCTT. The LUBT is more reliable than the H(2) BT for measurement of equine OCTT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equine veterinary journal. Supplement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00406.x\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equine veterinary journal. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00406.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equine veterinary journal. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00406.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

进行研究的原因:需要验证一种可靠的、无创的临床试验来量化马的口腔传输时间(OCTT)。这将促进以证据为基础的方法来调查和治疗马小肠疾病。目的:1)比较乳糖(13)c -脲醛呼气试验(LUBT)与氢呼气试验(H(2) BT)在OCTT测量中的应用。2)体外鉴定胃肠道微生物糖苷脲水解酶活性特征。3)生产用于马体内OCTT测量的LUBT优化方案。假设:显著的乳糖(13)c -脲酰脲((13)C-LU)水解酶活性仅限于大肠。摄入该同位素后的呼气(13)CO(2)生成速率将提供一个间接的可量化的口腔运输速率测量。必要的细菌活性可以通过未标记底物的引物剂量增强,如Man所示。方法:对8例健康人进行LUBT和H(2) BT联合检测。分析连续呼气末呼吸样本计算OCTT并对结果进行比较。采用新鲜粪便或死后收集的肠液,在体外研究(13)C-LU的消化。同位素发酵速率通过(13)CO(2)的出现率来测量。结果:在摄入标记的试验餐后,所有个体的呼气(13)CO(2)峰值都出现了,而H(2)到期是可变的。粪便和肠道微生物对(13)C-LU的消化都通过事先暴露于(12)C-LU而最大化。在盲肠中诱导的细菌葡萄糖脲水解酶活性显著高于小肠(n = 10, p)。结论:在正常情况下,C-LU的消化仅限于马的大肠,并通过事先暴露于(12)C-LU而增强,使(13)C-LU成为合适的马OCTT的无创标志物。LUBT比H(2) BT测量马OCTT更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In vitro validation of the lactose 13C-ureide breath test for equine orocaecal transit time measurement.

Reasons for performing study: Validation of a reliable, noninvasive clinical test for quantification of equine orocaecal transit time (OCTT) is required. This would facilitate an evidence-based approach to investigation and treatment of equine small intestinal disorders.

Objectives: 1) Comparison of the lactose (13) C-ureide breath test (LUBT) with the hydrogen breath test (H(2) BT) for OCTT measurement. 2) Identification of the characteristics of gastrointestinal microbial glycosylureide hydrolase activity in vitro. 3) Production of an optimised protocol for the LUBT for in vivo measurement of equine OCTT.

Hypothesis: Significant lactose (13) C-ureide ((13) C-LU) hydrolase activity is restricted to the large bowel. The rate of expiratory (13) CO(2) production after ingestion of the isotope will provide an indirect quantifiable measure of orocaecal transit rate. Requisite bacterial activity may be enhanced by a primer dose of unlabelled substrate as shown in Man.

Methods: Combined LUBT and H(2) BT were performed in 8 healthy individuals. Analysis of sequential end expiratory breath samples was used to calculate OCTT and results compared. Digestion of (13) C-LU was investigated in vitro using fresh faecal material or intestinal aliquots collected post mortem. Isotopic fermentation rate was measured by rate of appearance of (13) CO(2) .

Results: Peaks in expiratory (13) CO(2) occurred in all individuals after ingestion of the labelled test meal, whereas H(2) expiration was variable. Both faecal and intestinal microbial digestion of (13) C-LU were maximised by prior exposure to (12) C-LU. Induced bacterial glucoseureide hydrolase activity was significantly greater in the caecum than in the small intestine (n = 10, P<0.05).

Conclusions: Significant (13) C-LU digestion is restricted to the equine large intestine under normal conditions, and is enhanced by prior exposure to (12) C-LU, making (13) C-LU a suitable noninvasive marker of equine OCTT. The LUBT is more reliable than the H(2) BT for measurement of equine OCTT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dose titration of the clinical efficacy of intravenously administered flunixin meglumine in a reversible model of equine foot lameness. Influence of head and neck position on radiographic measurement of intervertebral distances between thoracic dorsal spinous processes in clinically sound horses. Retrospective study investigating causes of abnormal respiratory noise in horses following prosthetic laryngoplasty. Selenium deficiency associations with gender, breed, serum vitamin E and creatine kinase, clinical signs and diagnoses in horses of different age groups: a retrospective examination 1996-2011. Acquired equine polyneuropathy in Norway and Sweden: a clinical and epidemiological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1