试验:对药理学检查结果一致性的分析。

Eusebio Contreras, José Antonio Rojas-Ramírez, Consuelo Izazola-Conde, Héctor Javier Delgadillo-Gutiérrez, Yolanda Saldaña-Balmori, Claudi Barbarella Contreras-de la Parra, Nicandro Mendoza-Patiño, Ignacio Méndez-Ramírez
{"title":"试验:对药理学检查结果一致性的分析。","authors":"Eusebio Contreras,&nbsp;José Antonio Rojas-Ramírez,&nbsp;Consuelo Izazola-Conde,&nbsp;Héctor Javier Delgadillo-Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Yolanda Saldaña-Balmori,&nbsp;Claudi Barbarella Contreras-de la Parra,&nbsp;Nicandro Mendoza-Patiño,&nbsp;Ignacio Méndez-Ramírez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In higher education, learning variables are critical for professional activity and they should be properly assessed. Therefore, adequacy of evaluation instruments is very important. Consistency of an exam is one characteristic frequently studied to determine exam reliability. The subject of this study is a Pharmacology test of 70 items, taken by 849 medical students during a Pharmacology course at Medical School in the National University of Mexico in 2008. It explores whether students have been exposed to the same knowledge domain and if consistent execution in all parts of the exam is seen. Exam items were analyzed as independent items and as grouped items (by topic) and tested for consistency with Cronbach's test. Data were processed with the JMP statistical program (SAS Institute Inc.). The coefficient alpha was greater for independent items. We consider that grouping of items into topics tests integration of knowledge; a reasonable degree of consistency found when items are grouped, might favor this conclusion. Information obtained from the analysis of consistency of the exam, should provide elements for feedback during a course. Long term goals of this study include: to develop test instruments useful in formative evaluation and knowledge integration, to characterize the specificity of a Pharmacology exam, to determine degrees of knowledge acquisition and to get feedback about the quality of courses and exams.</p>","PeriodicalId":20701,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society","volume":"52 ","pages":"115-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing a test: Analysis of the consistency of a pharmacology exam.\",\"authors\":\"Eusebio Contreras,&nbsp;José Antonio Rojas-Ramírez,&nbsp;Consuelo Izazola-Conde,&nbsp;Héctor Javier Delgadillo-Gutiérrez,&nbsp;Yolanda Saldaña-Balmori,&nbsp;Claudi Barbarella Contreras-de la Parra,&nbsp;Nicandro Mendoza-Patiño,&nbsp;Ignacio Méndez-Ramírez\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In higher education, learning variables are critical for professional activity and they should be properly assessed. Therefore, adequacy of evaluation instruments is very important. Consistency of an exam is one characteristic frequently studied to determine exam reliability. The subject of this study is a Pharmacology test of 70 items, taken by 849 medical students during a Pharmacology course at Medical School in the National University of Mexico in 2008. It explores whether students have been exposed to the same knowledge domain and if consistent execution in all parts of the exam is seen. Exam items were analyzed as independent items and as grouped items (by topic) and tested for consistency with Cronbach's test. Data were processed with the JMP statistical program (SAS Institute Inc.). The coefficient alpha was greater for independent items. We consider that grouping of items into topics tests integration of knowledge; a reasonable degree of consistency found when items are grouped, might favor this conclusion. Information obtained from the analysis of consistency of the exam, should provide elements for feedback during a course. Long term goals of this study include: to develop test instruments useful in formative evaluation and knowledge integration, to characterize the specificity of a Pharmacology exam, to determine degrees of knowledge acquisition and to get feedback about the quality of courses and exams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society\",\"volume\":\"52 \",\"pages\":\"115-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在高等教育中,学习变量对专业活动至关重要,应该对其进行适当的评估。因此,评估工具的充分性是非常重要的。考试的一致性是确定考试可靠性的一个经常被研究的特征。本研究以2008年墨西哥国立大学医学院药理学课程849名医学生参加的70项药理学测试为研究对象。它探讨了学生是否接触了相同的知识领域,以及是否在考试的所有部分都看到了一致的执行。测试项目分别作为独立项目和分组项目(按主题)进行分析,并与Cronbach测试进行一致性测试。数据采用JMP统计程序(SAS Institute Inc.)处理。独立项目的alpha系数更大。我们认为题目分组可以测试知识的整合性;当项目被分组时,发现一个合理的一致性程度,可能有利于这个结论。从考试一致性分析中获得的信息,应在课程中提供反馈的要素。本研究的长期目标包括:开发有助于形成性评估和知识整合的测试工具,表征药理学考试的特殊性,确定知识获取程度,并获得有关课程和考试质量的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing a test: Analysis of the consistency of a pharmacology exam.

In higher education, learning variables are critical for professional activity and they should be properly assessed. Therefore, adequacy of evaluation instruments is very important. Consistency of an exam is one characteristic frequently studied to determine exam reliability. The subject of this study is a Pharmacology test of 70 items, taken by 849 medical students during a Pharmacology course at Medical School in the National University of Mexico in 2008. It explores whether students have been exposed to the same knowledge domain and if consistent execution in all parts of the exam is seen. Exam items were analyzed as independent items and as grouped items (by topic) and tested for consistency with Cronbach's test. Data were processed with the JMP statistical program (SAS Institute Inc.). The coefficient alpha was greater for independent items. We consider that grouping of items into topics tests integration of knowledge; a reasonable degree of consistency found when items are grouped, might favor this conclusion. Information obtained from the analysis of consistency of the exam, should provide elements for feedback during a course. Long term goals of this study include: to develop test instruments useful in formative evaluation and knowledge integration, to characterize the specificity of a Pharmacology exam, to determine degrees of knowledge acquisition and to get feedback about the quality of courses and exams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Calmodulin antagonists inhibit sea urchin sperm hyperpolarization necessary for directed movement toward the egg. Valproic acid modulates brain plasticity through epigenetic chromatin remodeling in the blind rat: implications for human sight recovery. Treatment with LA-419 prevents monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension and lung injury in the rat. Ageing, health and medication consumption in a sample of academic employees at a Mexican university. An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1