屈光参差性弱视(伴或不伴微斜视)的抑制深度。

Alison Y Firth, Clare Stevenson
{"title":"屈光参差性弱视(伴或不伴微斜视)的抑制深度。","authors":"Alison Y Firth,&nbsp;Clare Stevenson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There are conflicting reports concerning the relationship between depth of suppression and level of amblyopia in strabismics. Little attention has been given to anisometropes. This study examines the density of suppression in anisometropic amblyopes, with or without microtropia, and investigates whether there is a relationship with level of amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with anisometropia (defined as a difference of 1D or 0.5 D cyl), binocular single vision and a difference in corrected visual acuity of at least 0.1 logMAR between eyes were recalled. The degree of amblyopia was expressed as the interocular difference using the Bailey-Lovie logMAR chart. Stereoacuity (Titmus test), binocular alignment and fixation were recorded. The depth of suppression was measured using the neutral density filter bar together with the Worth four dot test at 4.5m (subtending an angle of 0.5 degrees). Best spherical equivalent (BSE) was calculated to represent anisometropia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen participants aged 8.3 years to 12.1 years (mean 9.7 years) completed the study. No significant correlation was present (r=0.10, p=0.74) between the depth of suppression and degree of amblyopia. However, there was a correlation between depth of suppression and level of stereoacuity (r=0.59, p=0.03). Six participants had microtropia and showed stronger suppression (p=0.03) and worse stereoacuity (p=0.001) than the pure anisometropes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No evidence was found of a relationship between density of suppression and amblyopia in this cohort of anisometropic amblyopes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72356,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depth of suppression in anisometropic amblyopia (with or without microtropia).\",\"authors\":\"Alison Y Firth,&nbsp;Clare Stevenson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>There are conflicting reports concerning the relationship between depth of suppression and level of amblyopia in strabismics. Little attention has been given to anisometropes. This study examines the density of suppression in anisometropic amblyopes, with or without microtropia, and investigates whether there is a relationship with level of amblyopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with anisometropia (defined as a difference of 1D or 0.5 D cyl), binocular single vision and a difference in corrected visual acuity of at least 0.1 logMAR between eyes were recalled. The degree of amblyopia was expressed as the interocular difference using the Bailey-Lovie logMAR chart. Stereoacuity (Titmus test), binocular alignment and fixation were recorded. The depth of suppression was measured using the neutral density filter bar together with the Worth four dot test at 4.5m (subtending an angle of 0.5 degrees). Best spherical equivalent (BSE) was calculated to represent anisometropia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen participants aged 8.3 years to 12.1 years (mean 9.7 years) completed the study. No significant correlation was present (r=0.10, p=0.74) between the depth of suppression and degree of amblyopia. However, there was a correlation between depth of suppression and level of stereoacuity (r=0.59, p=0.03). Six participants had microtropia and showed stronger suppression (p=0.03) and worse stereoacuity (p=0.001) than the pure anisometropes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No evidence was found of a relationship between density of suppression and amblyopia in this cohort of anisometropic amblyopes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:关于斜视患者的抑制深度与弱视水平之间的关系,目前有相互矛盾的报道。很少有人注意到各向异性。本研究考察了各向异性弱视伴或不伴微斜视的抑制密度,并探讨了是否与弱视水平有关。方法:对屈光参差(定义为1D或0.5 D圈的差异)、双眼单视力和双眼矫正视力差异至少为0.1 logMAR的患者进行召回。弱视程度用Bailey-Lovie logMAR图表示为眼间差异。立体视敏度(Titmus试验),双眼对准和固定记录。在4.5m处(夹角0.5度)采用中性密度滤光条结合Worth四点试验测量抑制深度。计算最佳球面当量(BSE)来表示参差。结果:13名参与者完成了研究,年龄8.3至12.1岁(平均9.7岁)。抑制深度与弱视程度无显著相关(r=0.10, p=0.74)。然而,抑制深度与立体视敏度之间存在相关性(r=0.59, p=0.03)。6名参与者患有微斜视,与纯参差性斜视相比,他们表现出更强的抑制(p=0.03)和更差的立体视锐度(p=0.001)。结论:在这组各向异性弱视患者中,没有证据表明抑制密度与弱视之间存在关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Depth of suppression in anisometropic amblyopia (with or without microtropia).

Background and purpose: There are conflicting reports concerning the relationship between depth of suppression and level of amblyopia in strabismics. Little attention has been given to anisometropes. This study examines the density of suppression in anisometropic amblyopes, with or without microtropia, and investigates whether there is a relationship with level of amblyopia.

Methods: Patients with anisometropia (defined as a difference of 1D or 0.5 D cyl), binocular single vision and a difference in corrected visual acuity of at least 0.1 logMAR between eyes were recalled. The degree of amblyopia was expressed as the interocular difference using the Bailey-Lovie logMAR chart. Stereoacuity (Titmus test), binocular alignment and fixation were recorded. The depth of suppression was measured using the neutral density filter bar together with the Worth four dot test at 4.5m (subtending an angle of 0.5 degrees). Best spherical equivalent (BSE) was calculated to represent anisometropia.

Results: Thirteen participants aged 8.3 years to 12.1 years (mean 9.7 years) completed the study. No significant correlation was present (r=0.10, p=0.74) between the depth of suppression and degree of amblyopia. However, there was a correlation between depth of suppression and level of stereoacuity (r=0.59, p=0.03). Six participants had microtropia and showed stronger suppression (p=0.03) and worse stereoacuity (p=0.001) than the pure anisometropes.

Conclusions: No evidence was found of a relationship between density of suppression and amblyopia in this cohort of anisometropic amblyopes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pediatric photoscreeners in high risk patients 2012: a comparison study of Plusoptix, Iscreen and SPOT. Near Point of Accommodation and Convergence after Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for Myopia. Retinitis pigmentosa and granular dystrophy: a rare and unique combination in one patient. Effects of atropine on the accommodative system: parameters to consider in its use for penalization treatment of amblyopia. 3D Printing Live Stem Cells; Hobbit in 3D; Super "Retina Displya"; Your Microbiome; Hospitals Takeover; Income Taxes; Bicyclists; Deer Dangers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1