麻风病的临床组织病理学一致性——100例临床、组织病理学和细菌学研究。

Q4 Medicine Indian journal of leprosy Pub Date : 2012-07-01
M Giridhar, G Arora, K Lajpal, K Singh Chahal
{"title":"麻风病的临床组织病理学一致性——100例临床、组织病理学和细菌学研究。","authors":"M Giridhar,&nbsp;G Arora,&nbsp;K Lajpal,&nbsp;K Singh Chahal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Leprosy is a treatable chronic infectious disease, prevalent in South Asian countries, especially India. Before labeling a patient as a case of leprosy and starting multidrug treatment for particular type, the clinical findings should be correlated and confirmed with histopathological examination and bacteriological index of skin biopsy. Skin biopsy is an important tool in diagnosing leprosy and determining the type of leprosy. In the present study, one hundred untreated clinically diagnosed cases of leprosy were studied according to Ridley-Jopling scale for confirmation of diagnosis and classification of leprosy. The study was done by routine H & E (Haematoxylin & Eosin) staining and Fite-Faraco's staining for acid-fast bacillus. The data pertaining to age, sex, clinical and histopathological classification of the type of leprosy were collected and analyzed. In analyzing the histopathology of a lesion, special attention was given to the following features, viz., invasion of the epidermis with or without erosion, involvement of the sub-epidermal zone, character and extent of granuloma, density of lymphocytic infiltrate epithelioid cells and other cellular elements, nerve involvement and the presence of Mycobacterium leprae. Histological diagnosis of leprosy was established in 98% of clinically diagnosed cases. Clinicohistopathological concordance was maximum in LL(93.75%) followed by BL(87.5%), TT(78.5%), BT(73.8%) and least in IL(27.78%). Overall, it was 60.23%. Indeterminate type of leprosy was diagnosed more on histologythan on clinical evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13412,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of leprosy","volume":"84 3","pages":"217-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicohistopathological concordance in leprosy - a clinical, histopathological and bacteriological study of 100 cases.\",\"authors\":\"M Giridhar,&nbsp;G Arora,&nbsp;K Lajpal,&nbsp;K Singh Chahal\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Leprosy is a treatable chronic infectious disease, prevalent in South Asian countries, especially India. Before labeling a patient as a case of leprosy and starting multidrug treatment for particular type, the clinical findings should be correlated and confirmed with histopathological examination and bacteriological index of skin biopsy. Skin biopsy is an important tool in diagnosing leprosy and determining the type of leprosy. In the present study, one hundred untreated clinically diagnosed cases of leprosy were studied according to Ridley-Jopling scale for confirmation of diagnosis and classification of leprosy. The study was done by routine H & E (Haematoxylin & Eosin) staining and Fite-Faraco's staining for acid-fast bacillus. The data pertaining to age, sex, clinical and histopathological classification of the type of leprosy were collected and analyzed. In analyzing the histopathology of a lesion, special attention was given to the following features, viz., invasion of the epidermis with or without erosion, involvement of the sub-epidermal zone, character and extent of granuloma, density of lymphocytic infiltrate epithelioid cells and other cellular elements, nerve involvement and the presence of Mycobacterium leprae. Histological diagnosis of leprosy was established in 98% of clinically diagnosed cases. Clinicohistopathological concordance was maximum in LL(93.75%) followed by BL(87.5%), TT(78.5%), BT(73.8%) and least in IL(27.78%). Overall, it was 60.23%. Indeterminate type of leprosy was diagnosed more on histologythan on clinical evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of leprosy\",\"volume\":\"84 3\",\"pages\":\"217-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of leprosy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of leprosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

麻风病是一种可治疗的慢性传染病,流行于南亚国家,特别是印度。在将患者标记为麻风病例并开始特定类型的多药治疗之前,临床表现应与组织病理学检查和皮肤活检细菌学指标相关联并得到证实。皮肤活检是诊断麻风病和确定麻风病类型的重要工具。本研究采用Ridley-Jopling量表对100例未经临床诊断的麻风患者进行研究,以确定麻风的诊断和分类。采用常规h&e (Haematoxylin & Eosin)染色法和Fite-Faraco染色法检测抗酸杆菌。收集和分析麻风病类型的年龄、性别、临床和组织病理学分类等资料。在分析病变的组织病理学时,应特别注意以下特征,即有无糜烂的表皮浸润,表皮下区受损伤,肉芽肿的特征和范围,淋巴细胞浸润上皮样细胞和其他细胞成分的密度,神经受损伤和麻风分枝杆菌的存在。在98%的临床诊断病例中,麻风病的组织学诊断得以确立。临床组织病理学一致性以LL最高(93.75%),其次为BL(87.5%)、TT(78.5%)、BT(73.8%), IL最低(27.78%)。总体而言,为60.23%。不确定类型的麻风病更多是通过组织学诊断而不是临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinicohistopathological concordance in leprosy - a clinical, histopathological and bacteriological study of 100 cases.

Leprosy is a treatable chronic infectious disease, prevalent in South Asian countries, especially India. Before labeling a patient as a case of leprosy and starting multidrug treatment for particular type, the clinical findings should be correlated and confirmed with histopathological examination and bacteriological index of skin biopsy. Skin biopsy is an important tool in diagnosing leprosy and determining the type of leprosy. In the present study, one hundred untreated clinically diagnosed cases of leprosy were studied according to Ridley-Jopling scale for confirmation of diagnosis and classification of leprosy. The study was done by routine H & E (Haematoxylin & Eosin) staining and Fite-Faraco's staining for acid-fast bacillus. The data pertaining to age, sex, clinical and histopathological classification of the type of leprosy were collected and analyzed. In analyzing the histopathology of a lesion, special attention was given to the following features, viz., invasion of the epidermis with or without erosion, involvement of the sub-epidermal zone, character and extent of granuloma, density of lymphocytic infiltrate epithelioid cells and other cellular elements, nerve involvement and the presence of Mycobacterium leprae. Histological diagnosis of leprosy was established in 98% of clinically diagnosed cases. Clinicohistopathological concordance was maximum in LL(93.75%) followed by BL(87.5%), TT(78.5%), BT(73.8%) and least in IL(27.78%). Overall, it was 60.23%. Indeterminate type of leprosy was diagnosed more on histologythan on clinical evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of leprosy
Indian journal of leprosy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Leprosy is one of the oldest journals of India published quarterly by Hind Kusht Nivaran Sangh (Indian Leprosy Association) since 1929. The Journal covers all research aspects of leprosy, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases.
期刊最新文献
Dapsone: An Update. Erythema Necroticans - A Case Report. A Traditional NSAID Aspirin along with Clofazimine in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum Reaction: Study of Six Cases. A Breast Lump in an Elderly Lady - Carcinoma or else ?. Correlates of Defaulting from MDT among Leprosy Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1