创伤后成长量表:DSM-IV创伤事件背景下的因素结构。

ISRN Psychiatry Pub Date : 2011-12-08 Print Date: 2012-01-01 DOI:10.5402/2012/937582
Princess E Osei-Bonsu, Terri L Weaver, Susan V Eisen, Jillon S Vander Wal
{"title":"创伤后成长量表:DSM-IV创伤事件背景下的因素结构。","authors":"Princess E Osei-Bonsu,&nbsp;Terri L Weaver,&nbsp;Susan V Eisen,&nbsp;Jillon S Vander Wal","doi":"10.5402/2012/937582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies examining the dimensionality of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) have yielded varying results. To date, no study has investigated the measure's factor structure in the context of DSM-defined traumatic events. The present study examined the structure in an undergraduate student sample (N = 379) reporting DSM-IV Criterion-A potentially traumatic events. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original five-factor structure. Follow-up exploratory factor analysis and CFA on random halves of the sample showed poor model fit for 1-, 3-, and 7-factor models. Results suggest that the PTGI factor structure is unclear amongst individuals with DSM-IV traumatic events, and continued use of the total score is most appropriate. Future directions including the utility of the PTGI factors are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":14749,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Psychiatry","volume":"2012 ","pages":"937582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/937582","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Factor Structure in the Context of DSM-IV Traumatic Events.\",\"authors\":\"Princess E Osei-Bonsu,&nbsp;Terri L Weaver,&nbsp;Susan V Eisen,&nbsp;Jillon S Vander Wal\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2012/937582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies examining the dimensionality of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) have yielded varying results. To date, no study has investigated the measure's factor structure in the context of DSM-defined traumatic events. The present study examined the structure in an undergraduate student sample (N = 379) reporting DSM-IV Criterion-A potentially traumatic events. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original five-factor structure. Follow-up exploratory factor analysis and CFA on random halves of the sample showed poor model fit for 1-, 3-, and 7-factor models. Results suggest that the PTGI factor structure is unclear amongst individuals with DSM-IV traumatic events, and continued use of the total score is most appropriate. Future directions including the utility of the PTGI factors are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"2012 \",\"pages\":\"937582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/937582\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/937582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/937582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

研究创伤后成长量表(PTGI)的维度已经产生了不同的结果。到目前为止,还没有研究在dsm定义的创伤性事件的背景下调查该测量的因素结构。本研究对报告DSM-IV标准- a潜在创伤性事件的本科生样本(N = 379)进行了结构检查。验证性因子分析(CFA)不支持原来的五因子结构。对随机一半样本的随访探索性因子分析和CFA显示,1、3和7因素模型的模型拟合度较差。结果表明,DSM-IV创伤性事件患者的PTGI因子结构尚不清楚,继续使用总分是最合适的。讨论了未来的发展方向,包括PTGI因子的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Factor Structure in the Context of DSM-IV Traumatic Events.

Studies examining the dimensionality of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) have yielded varying results. To date, no study has investigated the measure's factor structure in the context of DSM-defined traumatic events. The present study examined the structure in an undergraduate student sample (N = 379) reporting DSM-IV Criterion-A potentially traumatic events. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original five-factor structure. Follow-up exploratory factor analysis and CFA on random halves of the sample showed poor model fit for 1-, 3-, and 7-factor models. Results suggest that the PTGI factor structure is unclear amongst individuals with DSM-IV traumatic events, and continued use of the total score is most appropriate. Future directions including the utility of the PTGI factors are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Empathy in undergraduate medical students of bangladesh: psychometric analysis and differences by gender, academic year, and specialty preferences. Ziprasidone as adjunctive therapy in severe bipolar patients treated with clozapine. Clinical practice guidelines in psychiatry: more confusion than clarity? A critical review and recommendation of a unified guideline. The psychogeriatric patient in the emergency room: focus on management and disposition. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 negative modulation in phase I clinical trial: potential impact of circadian rhythm on the neuropsychiatric adverse reactions-do hallucinations matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1