颅颌面战斗损伤:损伤模式、常规治疗局限性及未来研究方向

Robert G Hale , Timothy Lew , Joseph C Wenke
{"title":"颅颌面战斗损伤:损伤模式、常规治疗局限性及未来研究方向","authors":"Robert G Hale ,&nbsp;Timothy Lew ,&nbsp;Joseph C Wenke","doi":"10.1016/S0377-5291(12)70002-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyses the US Army Joint Theatre Trauma Registry database for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) battle injuries (BI) experienced by US Service Members in Iraq/Afghanistan conflict to describe type, distribution and mechanism of injury.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>Joint Theatre Trauma Registry was queried from 19 October 2001 to 12 December 2007 for CMF BI entered in the database using ICD-9 codes; the data was compiled for BI soldiers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We have identified 7770 BI. About 26% had CMF BI. There were 4783 CMF BI among the 2014 BI (2.4 injuries per soldier). Majority of CMF BI were male (98%). Average age was 26 years. CMF BI by branch of service was Army 72%, Marines 24%, Navy 2% and Air Force 1%. Penetrating soft tissue injuries and fractures were 58% and 27%, respectively; 76% of fractures were open and 24% of soft tissue injuries were noted as complicated. Frequency of facial fractures was mandible 36%, maxilla/zygoma 19%, nose 14%, and orbit 11%. Remaining 20% not otherwise specified. Primary mechanism of injury was explosive devices (84%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Twenty-six per cent of all BI were to CMF area. CMF BI account for a disproportionate number of injuries observed in Iraq and Afghanistan compared with the previous American Wars. Mechanism of CMF BI involves explosive devices 84%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35891,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Dental Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0377-5291(12)70002-0","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Battle Injuries: Injury Patterns, Conventional Treatment Limitations and Direction of Future Research\",\"authors\":\"Robert G Hale ,&nbsp;Timothy Lew ,&nbsp;Joseph C Wenke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0377-5291(12)70002-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyses the US Army Joint Theatre Trauma Registry database for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) battle injuries (BI) experienced by US Service Members in Iraq/Afghanistan conflict to describe type, distribution and mechanism of injury.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>Joint Theatre Trauma Registry was queried from 19 October 2001 to 12 December 2007 for CMF BI entered in the database using ICD-9 codes; the data was compiled for BI soldiers.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We have identified 7770 BI. About 26% had CMF BI. There were 4783 CMF BI among the 2014 BI (2.4 injuries per soldier). Majority of CMF BI were male (98%). Average age was 26 years. CMF BI by branch of service was Army 72%, Marines 24%, Navy 2% and Air Force 1%. Penetrating soft tissue injuries and fractures were 58% and 27%, respectively; 76% of fractures were open and 24% of soft tissue injuries were noted as complicated. Frequency of facial fractures was mandible 36%, maxilla/zygoma 19%, nose 14%, and orbit 11%. Remaining 20% not otherwise specified. Primary mechanism of injury was explosive devices (84%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Twenty-six per cent of all BI were to CMF area. CMF BI account for a disproportionate number of injuries observed in Iraq and Afghanistan compared with the previous American Wars. Mechanism of CMF BI involves explosive devices 84%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0377-5291(12)70002-0\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377529112700020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377529112700020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究分析了美国陆军联合战区创伤登记数据库中美国军人在伊拉克/阿富汗冲突中经历的颅颌面(CMF)战斗损伤(BI),以描述损伤的类型、分布和机制。方法和材料使用ICD-9编码查询2001年10月19日至2007年12月12日联合手术室创伤登记处的CMF BI;这些数据是为BI士兵编制的。结果共鉴定出7770个BI。约26%患有CMF BI。在2014年的BI中,有4783名CMF BI(每名士兵2.4次受伤)。大多数CMF BI患者为男性(98%)。平均年龄为26岁。军种的CMF BI为陆军72%,海军陆战队24%,海军2%,空军1%。穿透性软组织损伤占58%,骨折占27%;76%的骨折为开放性骨折,24%的软组织损伤为并发症。面部骨折发生率为下颌骨36%,上颌骨/颧骨19%,鼻部14%,眼眶11%。其余20%未另有说明。爆炸装置是主要的伤害机制(84%)。结论所有BI中有26%发生在CMF区。与之前的美国战争相比,CMF BI在伊拉克和阿富汗造成了不成比例的伤害。CMF BI机理涉及爆炸装置84%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Craniomaxillofacial Battle Injuries: Injury Patterns, Conventional Treatment Limitations and Direction of Future Research

This study analyses the US Army Joint Theatre Trauma Registry database for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) battle injuries (BI) experienced by US Service Members in Iraq/Afghanistan conflict to describe type, distribution and mechanism of injury.

Methods and materials

Joint Theatre Trauma Registry was queried from 19 October 2001 to 12 December 2007 for CMF BI entered in the database using ICD-9 codes; the data was compiled for BI soldiers.

Results

We have identified 7770 BI. About 26% had CMF BI. There were 4783 CMF BI among the 2014 BI (2.4 injuries per soldier). Majority of CMF BI were male (98%). Average age was 26 years. CMF BI by branch of service was Army 72%, Marines 24%, Navy 2% and Air Force 1%. Penetrating soft tissue injuries and fractures were 58% and 27%, respectively; 76% of fractures were open and 24% of soft tissue injuries were noted as complicated. Frequency of facial fractures was mandible 36%, maxilla/zygoma 19%, nose 14%, and orbit 11%. Remaining 20% not otherwise specified. Primary mechanism of injury was explosive devices (84%).

Conclusions

Twenty-six per cent of all BI were to CMF area. CMF BI account for a disproportionate number of injuries observed in Iraq and Afghanistan compared with the previous American Wars. Mechanism of CMF BI involves explosive devices 84%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Singapore Dental Journal
Singapore Dental Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal covers all fields related to the presentday practice of dentistry, and includes Restorative Dentistry (Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials, Prosthodontics and Endodontics), Preventive Dentistry (Periodontics, Orthodontics, Paediatric Dentistry, Public Health and Health Services), Oral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Oral Pathology. Articles pertaining to dental education and the social, political and economic aspects of dental practice are also welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Reevaluating the Alliance-Outcome Relationship in the Early Sessions of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy of Depression. Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome Effect of scaling and root planing on level of immunoglobulin E and immunoglobulin G4 in children with gingivitis and house-dust mite allergy: A pilot randomised controlled trial. Preservation of the superficial temporal artery during resection of a pseudoaneurysm: A case report and review of the literature. Platelet-rich fibrin in combination with decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft for the management of mandibular degree II furcation defect: A randomised controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1