INNOVA视敏度系统立体试验与Frisby-Davis 2立体试验评价远处视敏度的比较。

Eric L Singman, Noelle S Matta, David I Silbert, Jin Tian
{"title":"INNOVA视敏度系统立体试验与Frisby-Davis 2立体试验评价远处视敏度的比较。","authors":"Eric L Singman,&nbsp;Noelle S Matta,&nbsp;David I Silbert,&nbsp;Jin Tian","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distance stereo acuity has been shown to be useful in monitoring conditions such as control of intermittent strabismus. The Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest has been shown to be reliable and is felt to be the gold standard in England. The device however is not widely available in the United States or Canada and is not automated. This study compares the Innova distance stereoacuity test with the Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven patients with normal acuity and a normal ophthalmology exam were evaluated. Prior to dilation all patients had an Innova distance stereoacuity test and FD2 test. Both the Innova distance stereoacuity test and the FD2 test were performed at ten feet. The results of the tests were compared using Bland-Altman plot analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The INNOVA system tended to underestimate distance stereoacuity by approximately 30 arc seconds compared to the FD2 test. If the INNOVA results were corrected by this amount, then there was a good correlation between the INNOVA results and the FD2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Innova distance stereoacuity test underestimates stereopsis by approximately 30 arc seconds but does so with sufficient consistency that it may serve as an acceptable method of measuring distance stereoacuity. This study is the first that has correlated the Innova stereoacuity test with the FD2.</p>","PeriodicalId":72356,"journal":{"name":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the INNOVA Visual Acuity System Stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 Stereotest for the Evaluation of Distance Stereoacuity.\",\"authors\":\"Eric L Singman,&nbsp;Noelle S Matta,&nbsp;David I Silbert,&nbsp;Jin Tian\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Distance stereo acuity has been shown to be useful in monitoring conditions such as control of intermittent strabismus. The Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest has been shown to be reliable and is felt to be the gold standard in England. The device however is not widely available in the United States or Canada and is not automated. This study compares the Innova distance stereoacuity test with the Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-seven patients with normal acuity and a normal ophthalmology exam were evaluated. Prior to dilation all patients had an Innova distance stereoacuity test and FD2 test. Both the Innova distance stereoacuity test and the FD2 test were performed at ten feet. The results of the tests were compared using Bland-Altman plot analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The INNOVA system tended to underestimate distance stereoacuity by approximately 30 arc seconds compared to the FD2 test. If the INNOVA results were corrected by this amount, then there was a good correlation between the INNOVA results and the FD2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Innova distance stereoacuity test underestimates stereopsis by approximately 30 arc seconds but does so with sufficient consistency that it may serve as an acceptable method of measuring distance stereoacuity. This study is the first that has correlated the Innova stereoacuity test with the FD2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Binocular vision & strabology quarterly, Simms-Romano's","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:距离立体视力已被证明是有用的监测条件,如控制间歇性斜视。弗里斯比戴维斯距离(FD2)立体测试已被证明是可靠的,并被认为是英国的黄金标准。然而,该设备在美国和加拿大并没有广泛使用,也不是自动化的。本研究比较Innova距离立体视敏度测验与FD2距离立体视敏度测验。方法:对27例视力正常、眼科检查正常的患者进行评价。扩张术前,所有患者均进行Innova距离立体视力测试和FD2测试。Innova距离立体敏锐度测试和FD2测试均在10英尺处进行。检验结果采用Bland-Altman图分析进行比较。结果:与FD2测试相比,INNOVA系统倾向于低估距离立体敏锐度约30角秒。如果INNOVA结果被修正了这个量,那么INNOVA结果和FD2之间有很好的相关性。结论:Innova距离立体视敏度测试低估了立体视敏度约30角秒,但具有足够的一致性,可以作为测量距离立体视敏度的可接受方法。这项研究是第一个将Innova立体敏锐度测试与FD2相关联的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the INNOVA Visual Acuity System Stereotest with the Frisby-Davis 2 Stereotest for the Evaluation of Distance Stereoacuity.

Purpose: Distance stereo acuity has been shown to be useful in monitoring conditions such as control of intermittent strabismus. The Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest has been shown to be reliable and is felt to be the gold standard in England. The device however is not widely available in the United States or Canada and is not automated. This study compares the Innova distance stereoacuity test with the Frisby Davis distance (FD2) stereotest.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients with normal acuity and a normal ophthalmology exam were evaluated. Prior to dilation all patients had an Innova distance stereoacuity test and FD2 test. Both the Innova distance stereoacuity test and the FD2 test were performed at ten feet. The results of the tests were compared using Bland-Altman plot analysis.

Results: The INNOVA system tended to underestimate distance stereoacuity by approximately 30 arc seconds compared to the FD2 test. If the INNOVA results were corrected by this amount, then there was a good correlation between the INNOVA results and the FD2.

Conclusion: The Innova distance stereoacuity test underestimates stereopsis by approximately 30 arc seconds but does so with sufficient consistency that it may serve as an acceptable method of measuring distance stereoacuity. This study is the first that has correlated the Innova stereoacuity test with the FD2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pediatric photoscreeners in high risk patients 2012: a comparison study of Plusoptix, Iscreen and SPOT. Near Point of Accommodation and Convergence after Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) for Myopia. Retinitis pigmentosa and granular dystrophy: a rare and unique combination in one patient. Effects of atropine on the accommodative system: parameters to consider in its use for penalization treatment of amblyopia. 3D Printing Live Stem Cells; Hobbit in 3D; Super "Retina Displya"; Your Microbiome; Hospitals Takeover; Income Taxes; Bicyclists; Deer Dangers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1