{"title":"心源性休克中的强离子间隙——计算似乎是错误的。","authors":"Rainer Gatz","doi":"10.3109/17482941.2013.859270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>These formulae are erroneous and lead to predictably grossly wrong results. The authors find SIG values of mean -14 mEq/l in the non-survivors' and -10 mEq/l in the survivors' group. ' According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in cardiogenic shocks patients.'</p>","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"16 1","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strong ion gap in cardiogenic shock - the calculation seems wrong.\",\"authors\":\"Rainer Gatz\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/17482941.2013.859270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>These formulae are erroneous and lead to predictably grossly wrong results. The authors find SIG values of mean -14 mEq/l in the non-survivors' and -10 mEq/l in the survivors' group. ' According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in cardiogenic shocks patients.'</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute cardiac care\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute cardiac care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2013.859270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Strong ion gap in cardiogenic shock - the calculation seems wrong.
These formulae are erroneous and lead to predictably grossly wrong results. The authors find SIG values of mean -14 mEq/l in the non-survivors' and -10 mEq/l in the survivors' group. ' According to our data the SIG approach does not seem to add further information to usual parameters in acid-base evaluation or early risk stratification in cardiogenic shocks patients.'
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
