研究乳腺癌、子宫颈癌和前列腺癌筛查与结直肠癌筛查之间的联系。

IF 2.7 Q3 ONCOLOGY Colorectal Cancer Pub Date : 2014-06-01 DOI:10.2217/crc.14.18
Michael D Wirth, Heather M Brandt, Heather Dolinger, James W Hardin, Patricia A Sharpe, Jan M Eberth
{"title":"研究乳腺癌、子宫颈癌和前列腺癌筛查与结直肠癌筛查之间的联系。","authors":"Michael D Wirth, Heather M Brandt, Heather Dolinger, James W Hardin, Patricia A Sharpe, Jan M Eberth","doi":"10.2217/crc.14.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare participation in breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This random digit-dialed survey includes participants (aged 50-75 years) from South Carolina (USA). Past participation information in fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, mammography, clinical breast examination, Pap test, prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination was obtained.Adjusted odds ratios are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among European-American women, any cervical or breast cancer screening was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Among African-American women, mammography was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests were associated with adherence to any CRC screening test among all men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should explore approaches inclusive of cancer screening recommendations for multiple cancer types for reduction of cancer screening disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":43638,"journal":{"name":"Colorectal Cancer","volume":"3 3","pages":"253-263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/crc.14.18","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening.\",\"authors\":\"Michael D Wirth, Heather M Brandt, Heather Dolinger, James W Hardin, Patricia A Sharpe, Jan M Eberth\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/crc.14.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare participation in breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>This random digit-dialed survey includes participants (aged 50-75 years) from South Carolina (USA). Past participation information in fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, mammography, clinical breast examination, Pap test, prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination was obtained.Adjusted odds ratios are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among European-American women, any cervical or breast cancer screening was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Among African-American women, mammography was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests were associated with adherence to any CRC screening test among all men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future research should explore approaches inclusive of cancer screening recommendations for multiple cancer types for reduction of cancer screening disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colorectal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"253-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2217/crc.14.18\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colorectal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/crc.14.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colorectal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/crc.14.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

目的:比较乳腺癌、宫颈癌和前列腺癌与结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的参与情况。材料与方法:这项随机数字拨号调查包括来自南卡罗来纳州(美国)的参与者(年龄50-75岁)。获得以往参与粪便隐血检查、乙状结肠镜检查、结肠镜检查、乳房x光检查、临床乳腺检查、巴氏涂片检查、前列腺特异性抗原和直肠指检的信息。报告了调整后的优势比。结果:在欧美女性中,任何宫颈癌或乳腺癌筛查与任何CRC筛查的依从性相关。在非裔美国女性中,乳房x光检查与CRC筛查的依从性相关。直肠指检和前列腺特异性抗原检测与所有男性CRC筛查试验的依从性相关。结论:未来的研究应探索包括多种癌症类型的癌症筛查建议在内的方法,以减少癌症筛查的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining connections between screening for breast, cervical and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer screening.

Aim: To compare participation in breast, cervical and prostate cancer screening with colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Materials & methods: This random digit-dialed survey includes participants (aged 50-75 years) from South Carolina (USA). Past participation information in fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, mammography, clinical breast examination, Pap test, prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination was obtained.Adjusted odds ratios are reported.

Results: Among European-American women, any cervical or breast cancer screening was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Among African-American women, mammography was associated with adherence to any CRC screening. Digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen tests were associated with adherence to any CRC screening test among all men.

Conclusion: Future research should explore approaches inclusive of cancer screening recommendations for multiple cancer types for reduction of cancer screening disparities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer ONCOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in the developed world. Risk factors for colorectal cancer are on the rise in many countries; populations are aging, and obesity and diabetes are increasing. National screening programs are helping to detect cancer while it is still curable; however, colorectal cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer deaths in the USA and options are still limited for those with more advanced disease. Consequently, colorectal cancer is a major research priority for government, pharmaceutical companies and non-profit organizations. Research into diagnosis and optimum treatment of the disease is progressing rapidly, with new advances reported every day. Colorectal Cancer presents reviews, analysis and commentary. on all aspects of colorectal cancer.
期刊最新文献
The role of colorectal cancer plasticity in metastasis and treatment: an interview with Mirjana Efremova Prognostic significance of the diameter of superior rectal vein for locally advanced rectal cancer Clinical and quality of life outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil: PRECONNECT and TALLISUR studies Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: trends from the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry across three decades Exosome-derived miRNAs regulate macrophage-colorectal cancer cell cross-talk during aggressive tumor development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1