结扎方法对模拟舌切牙对中上颌弓力/力矩系统的影响。

Q3 Medicine Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Pub Date : 2014-10-30 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874120701408010106
Surbhi Seru, Dan L Romanyk, Roger W Toogood, Jason P Carey, Paul W Major
{"title":"结扎方法对模拟舌切牙对中上颌弓力/力矩系统的影响。","authors":"Surbhi Seru,&nbsp;Dan L Romanyk,&nbsp;Roger W Toogood,&nbsp;Jason P Carey,&nbsp;Paul W Major","doi":"10.2174/1874120701408010106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is a difference in the magnitude of forces and moments produced by elastic ligation when compared to passive ligation, and whether these forces and moments propagate differently along the arch for the two ligation types. A lingual incisor malalignment was used in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Orthodontic Simulator (OSIM) was used to quantify the three-dimensional forces and moments applied on the teeth given a lingually displaced incisor. A repeated measures MANOVA was performed to statistically analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interaction factor illustrated convincing evidence that there is a difference in maximum force and moment values for all outcome variables between ligation types considering all tooth positions along the arch. The mean differences for FX and FY between ligation types were found to be clinically significant, with values for elastic ligation consistently higher than passive ligation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that the maximum forces and moments produced by elastic ligation are greater than those produced by passive ligation and that the magnitude of this difference for the mesiodistal and buccolingual forces is clinically relevant. Additionally, it was determined that elastic ligation causes forces and moments to propagate further along the arch than passive ligation for all outcome variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":39121,"journal":{"name":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","volume":"8 ","pages":"106-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/c1/TOBEJ-8-106.PMC4231375.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of ligation method on maxillary arch force/moment systems for a simulated lingual incisor malalignment.\",\"authors\":\"Surbhi Seru,&nbsp;Dan L Romanyk,&nbsp;Roger W Toogood,&nbsp;Jason P Carey,&nbsp;Paul W Major\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874120701408010106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is a difference in the magnitude of forces and moments produced by elastic ligation when compared to passive ligation, and whether these forces and moments propagate differently along the arch for the two ligation types. A lingual incisor malalignment was used in this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Orthodontic Simulator (OSIM) was used to quantify the three-dimensional forces and moments applied on the teeth given a lingually displaced incisor. A repeated measures MANOVA was performed to statistically analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interaction factor illustrated convincing evidence that there is a difference in maximum force and moment values for all outcome variables between ligation types considering all tooth positions along the arch. The mean differences for FX and FY between ligation types were found to be clinically significant, with values for elastic ligation consistently higher than passive ligation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was found that the maximum forces and moments produced by elastic ligation are greater than those produced by passive ligation and that the magnitude of this difference for the mesiodistal and buccolingual forces is clinically relevant. Additionally, it was determined that elastic ligation causes forces and moments to propagate further along the arch than passive ligation for all outcome variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"106-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ae/c1/TOBEJ-8-106.PMC4231375.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Biomedical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701408010106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是确定与被动结扎相比,弹性结扎所产生的力和力矩的大小是否存在差异,以及两种结扎类型中这些力和力矩沿弓的传播是否不同。在本研究中使用舌切牙错位。方法:采用正畸模拟器(OSIM)对舌移切牙的三维力和力矩进行量化。采用重复测量方差分析对数据进行统计分析。结果:相互作用因素显示了令人信服的证据,考虑到沿牙弓的所有牙齿位置,结扎类型之间所有结果变量的最大力和力矩值存在差异。不同结扎类型间FX和FY的平均差异具有临床意义,弹性结扎值始终高于被动结扎值。结论:弹性结扎所产生的最大力和力矩大于被动结扎所产生的最大力和力矩,并且这种差异的大小在中远端和颊舌力方面具有临床意义。此外,对于所有结果变量,我们确定弹性结扎比被动结扎使力和力矩沿着弓传播得更远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of ligation method on maxillary arch force/moment systems for a simulated lingual incisor malalignment.

Introduction: The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is a difference in the magnitude of forces and moments produced by elastic ligation when compared to passive ligation, and whether these forces and moments propagate differently along the arch for the two ligation types. A lingual incisor malalignment was used in this study.

Methods: The Orthodontic Simulator (OSIM) was used to quantify the three-dimensional forces and moments applied on the teeth given a lingually displaced incisor. A repeated measures MANOVA was performed to statistically analyze the data.

Results: The interaction factor illustrated convincing evidence that there is a difference in maximum force and moment values for all outcome variables between ligation types considering all tooth positions along the arch. The mean differences for FX and FY between ligation types were found to be clinically significant, with values for elastic ligation consistently higher than passive ligation.

Conclusion: It was found that the maximum forces and moments produced by elastic ligation are greater than those produced by passive ligation and that the magnitude of this difference for the mesiodistal and buccolingual forces is clinically relevant. Additionally, it was determined that elastic ligation causes forces and moments to propagate further along the arch than passive ligation for all outcome variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal
Open Biomedical Engineering Journal Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
F.E.M. Stress-Investigation of Scolios Apex. Characterization of the F-box Proteins FBXW2 and FBXL14 in the Initiation of Bone Regeneration in Transplants given to Nude Mice. Natural Sensations Evoked in Distal Extremities Using Surface Electrical Stimulation. Investigating the Conformation of S100β Protein Under Physiological Parameters Using Computational Modeling: A Clue for Rational Drug Design. Reliability, Learnability and Efficiency of Two Tools for Cement Crowns Retrieval in Dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1