为什么不将伦理融入HTA:原因的识别和评估。

GMS health technology assessment Pub Date : 2014-11-26 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.3205/hta000120
Bjørn Hofmann
{"title":"为什么不将伦理融入HTA:原因的识别和评估。","authors":"Bjørn Hofmann","doi":"10.3205/hta000120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>From the conception of HTA in the 1970s it has been argued that addressing ethical issues is an element of HTA, and many methods for integrating ethics in HTA have become available. However, despite almost 40 years with repeated intentions, only few HTA reports include ethical analysis. Why is this so? How come, ethics is a constituent part of HTA, there are many methods available, but ethics is rarely part of practical HTA work? This is the key question of this article and several reasons why ethics is not a part of HTA are identified. A) Ethicists are professional strangers in HTA. B) A common agreed methodology for integrating ethics is lacking. Ethics methodology appears to be C) deficient, D) insufficient, or E) unsuitable. F) Integrating ethics in HTA is neither efficient nor needed for successful HTA. G) Most moral issues are general, and are not specific to a given technology. H) All relevant ethical issues can be handled within other frameworks, e.g., within economics. I) Ethics can undermine or burst the foundation of HTA. Hence, there are many reasons why ethics is not an integrated part of HTA so many years after identifying ethics as constitutive to HTA. These reasons may all explain why it is so, but on closer scrutiny, they do not work as compelling arguments for not addressing ethical issues in HTA. Hence, the identified reasons may work well as explanations, but not as justifications. In order to move on from a situation of failure we can: Exclude ethics from definitions of HTA, and as a consequence, establish a separate kind of evaluation (Health Technology Evaluation - HTE). Take the existing definition seriously and actually integrate ethics in the performance of HTA practice. Amend, expand or change HTA so that ethics is more genuinely incorporated. Which of these options to choose is open for discussion, but we need to move away from a situation where we have a definition of HTA which does not correspond with HTA practice. </p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"10 ","pages":"Doc04"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/hta000120","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons.\",\"authors\":\"Bjørn Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/hta000120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>From the conception of HTA in the 1970s it has been argued that addressing ethical issues is an element of HTA, and many methods for integrating ethics in HTA have become available. However, despite almost 40 years with repeated intentions, only few HTA reports include ethical analysis. Why is this so? How come, ethics is a constituent part of HTA, there are many methods available, but ethics is rarely part of practical HTA work? This is the key question of this article and several reasons why ethics is not a part of HTA are identified. A) Ethicists are professional strangers in HTA. B) A common agreed methodology for integrating ethics is lacking. Ethics methodology appears to be C) deficient, D) insufficient, or E) unsuitable. F) Integrating ethics in HTA is neither efficient nor needed for successful HTA. G) Most moral issues are general, and are not specific to a given technology. H) All relevant ethical issues can be handled within other frameworks, e.g., within economics. I) Ethics can undermine or burst the foundation of HTA. Hence, there are many reasons why ethics is not an integrated part of HTA so many years after identifying ethics as constitutive to HTA. These reasons may all explain why it is so, but on closer scrutiny, they do not work as compelling arguments for not addressing ethical issues in HTA. Hence, the identified reasons may work well as explanations, but not as justifications. In order to move on from a situation of failure we can: Exclude ethics from definitions of HTA, and as a consequence, establish a separate kind of evaluation (Health Technology Evaluation - HTE). Take the existing definition seriously and actually integrate ethics in the performance of HTA practice. Amend, expand or change HTA so that ethics is more genuinely incorporated. Which of these options to choose is open for discussion, but we need to move away from a situation where we have a definition of HTA which does not correspond with HTA practice. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS health technology assessment\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Doc04\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/hta000120\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS health technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/hta000120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

从20世纪70年代HTA的概念开始,人们就认为解决伦理问题是HTA的一个要素,并且已经出现了许多将伦理融入HTA的方法。然而,尽管有近40年的反复意图,只有少数HTA报告包括伦理分析。为什么会这样呢?为什么伦理是HTA的一个组成部分,有很多可用的方法,但伦理很少是实际HTA工作的一部分?这是本文的关键问题,并指出了为什么道德不是HTA的一部分的几个原因。A)伦理学家在HTA中是专业的陌生人。B)缺乏统一的伦理学方法论。伦理方法论似乎是C)缺陷,D)不足,或E)不合适。F)在HTA中整合伦理既不是高效的,也不是成功HTA所必需的。G)大多数道德问题是普遍的,而不是特定于某一特定技术的。H)所有相关的伦理问题都可以在其他框架内处理,例如在经济学框架内。1)伦理会破坏或破坏HTA的基础。因此,在确定伦理是HTA的组成部分这么多年之后,为什么伦理没有成为HTA的一个组成部分,有很多原因。这些原因也许都可以解释为什么会这样,但仔细研究一下,它们并不能作为不解决HTA道德问题的令人信服的理由。因此,确定的原因可以很好地解释,但不能作为理由。为了摆脱失败的局面,我们可以:从卫生技术评价的定义中排除伦理,并因此建立一种单独的评价(卫生技术评价- HTE)。认真对待现有的定义,并在HTA实践的表现中真正融入伦理。修订、扩大或改变HTA,以便更真实地纳入道德规范。在这些选项中选择哪一个是可以讨论的,但我们需要摆脱我们对HTA的定义与HTA的实践不一致的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why not integrate ethics in HTA: identification and assessment of the reasons.

From the conception of HTA in the 1970s it has been argued that addressing ethical issues is an element of HTA, and many methods for integrating ethics in HTA have become available. However, despite almost 40 years with repeated intentions, only few HTA reports include ethical analysis. Why is this so? How come, ethics is a constituent part of HTA, there are many methods available, but ethics is rarely part of practical HTA work? This is the key question of this article and several reasons why ethics is not a part of HTA are identified. A) Ethicists are professional strangers in HTA. B) A common agreed methodology for integrating ethics is lacking. Ethics methodology appears to be C) deficient, D) insufficient, or E) unsuitable. F) Integrating ethics in HTA is neither efficient nor needed for successful HTA. G) Most moral issues are general, and are not specific to a given technology. H) All relevant ethical issues can be handled within other frameworks, e.g., within economics. I) Ethics can undermine or burst the foundation of HTA. Hence, there are many reasons why ethics is not an integrated part of HTA so many years after identifying ethics as constitutive to HTA. These reasons may all explain why it is so, but on closer scrutiny, they do not work as compelling arguments for not addressing ethical issues in HTA. Hence, the identified reasons may work well as explanations, but not as justifications. In order to move on from a situation of failure we can: Exclude ethics from definitions of HTA, and as a consequence, establish a separate kind of evaluation (Health Technology Evaluation - HTE). Take the existing definition seriously and actually integrate ethics in the performance of HTA practice. Amend, expand or change HTA so that ethics is more genuinely incorporated. Which of these options to choose is open for discussion, but we need to move away from a situation where we have a definition of HTA which does not correspond with HTA practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variability in the prescription of drugs with uncertain effectiveness. The case of SYSADOA in the Basque Country. Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments. Effects of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapies among adult patients with acute kidney injury. Telemedicine: The legal framework (or the lack of it) in Europe. Complex health care interventions: Characteristics relevant for ethical analysis in health technology assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1