肝切除术后硬膜外镇痛与ON-Q浸润导尿管治疗疼痛的比较。

Jose M Soliz, Rodolfo Gebhardt, Lei Feng, Wenli Dong, Margaret Reich, Steven Curley
{"title":"肝切除术后硬膜外镇痛与ON-Q浸润导尿管治疗疼痛的比较。","authors":"Jose M Soliz,&nbsp;Rodolfo Gebhardt,&nbsp;Lei Feng,&nbsp;Wenli Dong,&nbsp;Margaret Reich,&nbsp;Steven Curley","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2013.31002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pain control after hepatic resection presents unique challenges as subcostal incisions, rib retraction, and diaphragmatic irritation can lead to significant pain. Both epidural analgesia and ON-Q catheters have been used for postoperative pain management after hepatic surgery, but to our knowledge have not been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 143 patient between the ages 18 and 70 were reviewed who underwent hepatic resection by a single surgeon. Patients were categorized according to method of postoperative pain control. Average pain scores for both study groups were collected until POD#3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data and the length of surgery were similar between the groups (all p>0.05). On the day of surgery and POD#1, average pain scores for the epidural group were lower than the ON-Q group (<i>P</i><0.0001 and <i>P</i>=0.0008 respectively). There was no difference in pain scores on POD #2 (<i>P</i>=.2369) or POD #3 (<i>P</i>=0.2289).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epidural analgesia provides superior pain control on the day of surgery and POD#1 when compared to On-Q catheter with IV PCA. There was no difference in pain scores on POD#2 or POD#3. Future prospective randomized trials comparing these analgesic methods will be required to further evaluate enhanced recovery after hepatic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":56551,"journal":{"name":"麻醉学期刊(英文)","volume":"3 1","pages":"3-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286355/pdf/nihms633207.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing epidural analgesia and ON-Q infiltrating catheters for pain management after hepatic resection.\",\"authors\":\"Jose M Soliz,&nbsp;Rodolfo Gebhardt,&nbsp;Lei Feng,&nbsp;Wenli Dong,&nbsp;Margaret Reich,&nbsp;Steven Curley\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojanes.2013.31002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Pain control after hepatic resection presents unique challenges as subcostal incisions, rib retraction, and diaphragmatic irritation can lead to significant pain. Both epidural analgesia and ON-Q catheters have been used for postoperative pain management after hepatic surgery, but to our knowledge have not been directly compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The records of 143 patient between the ages 18 and 70 were reviewed who underwent hepatic resection by a single surgeon. Patients were categorized according to method of postoperative pain control. Average pain scores for both study groups were collected until POD#3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demographic data and the length of surgery were similar between the groups (all p>0.05). On the day of surgery and POD#1, average pain scores for the epidural group were lower than the ON-Q group (<i>P</i><0.0001 and <i>P</i>=0.0008 respectively). There was no difference in pain scores on POD #2 (<i>P</i>=.2369) or POD #3 (<i>P</i>=0.2289).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Epidural analgesia provides superior pain control on the day of surgery and POD#1 when compared to On-Q catheter with IV PCA. There was no difference in pain scores on POD#2 or POD#3. Future prospective randomized trials comparing these analgesic methods will be required to further evaluate enhanced recovery after hepatic surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"麻醉学期刊(英文)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"3-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286355/pdf/nihms633207.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"麻醉学期刊(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2013.31002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"麻醉学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2013.31002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

背景和目的:肝切除术后的疼痛控制面临着独特的挑战,因为肋下切口、肋骨收缩和膈刺激可导致明显的疼痛。硬膜外镇痛和ON-Q导管都被用于肝脏手术后的疼痛管理,但据我们所知还没有直接比较。方法:回顾性分析143例18 ~ 70岁的肝切除术患者的临床资料。根据术后疼痛控制方法对患者进行分类。收集两个研究组的平均疼痛评分,直到第三阶段。结果:两组患者人口学资料及手术时间相似(p>0.05)。在手术当日和POD#1时,硬膜外组的平均疼痛评分低于On - q组(PP=0.0008)。POD #2 (P= 0.2369)和POD #3 (P=0.2289)疼痛评分无差异。结论:与on - q导管与IV PCA相比,硬膜外镇痛在手术当天和POD#1中提供了更好的疼痛控制。POD#2和POD#3的疼痛评分没有差异。未来的前瞻性随机试验比较这些镇痛方法将需要进一步评估肝手术后增强的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing epidural analgesia and ON-Q infiltrating catheters for pain management after hepatic resection.

Background and objectives: Pain control after hepatic resection presents unique challenges as subcostal incisions, rib retraction, and diaphragmatic irritation can lead to significant pain. Both epidural analgesia and ON-Q catheters have been used for postoperative pain management after hepatic surgery, but to our knowledge have not been directly compared.

Methods: The records of 143 patient between the ages 18 and 70 were reviewed who underwent hepatic resection by a single surgeon. Patients were categorized according to method of postoperative pain control. Average pain scores for both study groups were collected until POD#3.

Results: Demographic data and the length of surgery were similar between the groups (all p>0.05). On the day of surgery and POD#1, average pain scores for the epidural group were lower than the ON-Q group (P<0.0001 and P=0.0008 respectively). There was no difference in pain scores on POD #2 (P=.2369) or POD #3 (P=0.2289).

Conclusions: Epidural analgesia provides superior pain control on the day of surgery and POD#1 when compared to On-Q catheter with IV PCA. There was no difference in pain scores on POD#2 or POD#3. Future prospective randomized trials comparing these analgesic methods will be required to further evaluate enhanced recovery after hepatic surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
371
期刊最新文献
Does Checklist Implementation Improve Quantity of Data Transfer: An Observation in Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU). Intraoperative Gastric Tube Intubation: A Summary of Case Studies and Review of the Literature. Comparing epidural analgesia and ON-Q infiltrating catheters for pain management after hepatic resection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1