便携式红外热像仪与彩色多普勒超声诊断下肢外周动脉疾病的比较研究。

Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases Pub Date : 2022-08-08 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/amsad/150716
Mauro de Deus Passos, Adson Ferreira da Rocha
{"title":"便携式红外热像仪与彩色多普勒超声诊断下肢外周动脉疾病的比较研究。","authors":"Mauro de Deus Passos,&nbsp;Adson Ferreira da Rocha","doi":"10.5114/amsad/150716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to evaluate whether infrared thermography (IRT) with a portable camera is a useful tool for diagnosing or screening peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs (PAD-LL) when compared with the traditional method of color Doppler ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study enrolled 90 volunteers: 45 who were diagnosed with PAD-LL (PAD-LL group) and 45 who did not have a diagnosis of PAD-LL (control group). The diagnosis was made using color Doppler ultrasonography, and the results were compared with those of IRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRT-based procedure evaluated in this study had a sensitivity of 97.62% and a specificity of 91.67% for PAD-LL diagnosis compared to color Doppler ultrasonography. The method was limited for diagnosing PAD-LL manifesting above the knees (suprapopliteal PAD-LL). Our results also suggest that the ankle-brachial index is an important predictor of PAD-LL, with a sensitivity of 91.17% and a specificity of 75% at a value of ≤ 0.9. Current or previous smoking habits, higher body mass index, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were significantly elevated in the PAD-LL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that IRT is an efficient and low-cost method for screening and diagnosing PAD-LL, particularly infrapopliteal PAD-LL manifesting below the knees. However, further studies are required to establish the validity of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":8317,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/60/AMS-AD-7-150716.PMC9487801.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of infrared thermography with a portable camera as a diagnostic tool for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs compared with color Doppler ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Mauro de Deus Passos,&nbsp;Adson Ferreira da Rocha\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/amsad/150716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to evaluate whether infrared thermography (IRT) with a portable camera is a useful tool for diagnosing or screening peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs (PAD-LL) when compared with the traditional method of color Doppler ultrasonography.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study enrolled 90 volunteers: 45 who were diagnosed with PAD-LL (PAD-LL group) and 45 who did not have a diagnosis of PAD-LL (control group). The diagnosis was made using color Doppler ultrasonography, and the results were compared with those of IRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The IRT-based procedure evaluated in this study had a sensitivity of 97.62% and a specificity of 91.67% for PAD-LL diagnosis compared to color Doppler ultrasonography. The method was limited for diagnosing PAD-LL manifesting above the knees (suprapopliteal PAD-LL). Our results also suggest that the ankle-brachial index is an important predictor of PAD-LL, with a sensitivity of 91.17% and a specificity of 75% at a value of ≤ 0.9. Current or previous smoking habits, higher body mass index, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were significantly elevated in the PAD-LL group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicate that IRT is an efficient and low-cost method for screening and diagnosing PAD-LL, particularly infrapopliteal PAD-LL manifesting below the knees. However, further studies are required to establish the validity of this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2c/60/AMS-AD-7-150716.PMC9487801.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad/150716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Medical Sciences. Atherosclerotic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/amsad/150716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言:我们的目的是评估便携式红外热像仪(IRT)与传统的彩色多普勒超声检查方法相比,是否能作为诊断或筛查下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD-LL)的有用工具。材料和方法:本研究招募了90名志愿者:45名被诊断为PAD-LL (PAD-LL组),45名未被诊断为PAD-LL(对照组)。采用彩色多普勒超声诊断,并与IRT结果进行比较。结果:与彩色多普勒超声相比,本研究评估的基于红外光谱的方法诊断PAD-LL的敏感性为97.62%,特异性为91.67%。该方法对表现在膝盖以上的PAD-LL(膝上PAD-LL)的诊断有局限性。我们的研究结果还表明,踝臂指数是PAD-LL的重要预测指标,敏感性为91.17%,特异性为75%,值≤0.9。目前或以前的吸烟习惯、较高的体重指数和糖尿病的存在在PAD-LL组中显著升高。结论:我们的研究结果表明,IRT是一种高效、低成本的筛查和诊断PAD-LL的方法,特别是表现在膝盖以下的膝下PAD-LL。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定这种技术的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of infrared thermography with a portable camera as a diagnostic tool for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs compared with color Doppler ultrasonography.

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate whether infrared thermography (IRT) with a portable camera is a useful tool for diagnosing or screening peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs (PAD-LL) when compared with the traditional method of color Doppler ultrasonography.

Material and methods: The study enrolled 90 volunteers: 45 who were diagnosed with PAD-LL (PAD-LL group) and 45 who did not have a diagnosis of PAD-LL (control group). The diagnosis was made using color Doppler ultrasonography, and the results were compared with those of IRT.

Results: The IRT-based procedure evaluated in this study had a sensitivity of 97.62% and a specificity of 91.67% for PAD-LL diagnosis compared to color Doppler ultrasonography. The method was limited for diagnosing PAD-LL manifesting above the knees (suprapopliteal PAD-LL). Our results also suggest that the ankle-brachial index is an important predictor of PAD-LL, with a sensitivity of 91.17% and a specificity of 75% at a value of ≤ 0.9. Current or previous smoking habits, higher body mass index, and the presence of diabetes mellitus were significantly elevated in the PAD-LL group.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that IRT is an efficient and low-cost method for screening and diagnosing PAD-LL, particularly infrapopliteal PAD-LL manifesting below the knees. However, further studies are required to establish the validity of this technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-medication practice among adults in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis from the national inpatient sample Determinants of serum cytokines in a population sample of healthy subjects from Iran The choice of conduits in coronary artery bypass surgery Primitive reflexes beyond neonatal paediatrics: primitive reflexes and the visual system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1