[生命伦理学与循证医学的对话,叙事伦理学的视角]。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.4067/S0034-98872022000400549
Nadia Escobar-Salinas
{"title":"[生命伦理学与循证医学的对话,叙事伦理学的视角]。","authors":"Nadia Escobar-Salinas","doi":"10.4067/S0034-98872022000400549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is the methodological paradigm of Western medicine today. EBM is expected to reduce the use of intuition and to promote the use of scientific evidence, in the clinical decision-making process. Benefits of EBM in clinical practice are thoroughly documented, however, there are also critics. Among other issues, EBM is thought to contribute to an excessive reductionism, to neglect context variables and individual attributes involved in the physician-patient relationship. All the above could lead to several bioethical conflicts. This work consists in a literature review that examines the interaction between EBM and Bioethics in a reciprocity frame, in order to approach possible ethical conflicts that emerge with the use of EBM, and later analyze them from the perspective of the Narrative Ethics model, proposed by the philosopher Paul Ricoeur.</p>","PeriodicalId":21360,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Dialogue between bioethics and evidence- based medicine, a narrative ethics perspective].\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Escobar-Salinas\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0034-98872022000400549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is the methodological paradigm of Western medicine today. EBM is expected to reduce the use of intuition and to promote the use of scientific evidence, in the clinical decision-making process. Benefits of EBM in clinical practice are thoroughly documented, however, there are also critics. Among other issues, EBM is thought to contribute to an excessive reductionism, to neglect context variables and individual attributes involved in the physician-patient relationship. All the above could lead to several bioethical conflicts. This work consists in a literature review that examines the interaction between EBM and Bioethics in a reciprocity frame, in order to approach possible ethical conflicts that emerge with the use of EBM, and later analyze them from the perspective of the Narrative Ethics model, proposed by the philosopher Paul Ricoeur.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista medica de Chile\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022000400549\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872022000400549","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

循证医学(EBM)是当今西方医学的方法论范式。循证医学有望在临床决策过程中减少直觉的使用,促进科学证据的使用。循证医学在临床实践中的好处是有充分记录的,然而,也有批评。在其他问题中,循证医学被认为导致了过度的还原论,忽视了医患关系中涉及的环境变量和个人属性。所有这些都可能导致一些生物伦理冲突。这项工作包括一项文献综述,在互惠框架中考察循证医学与生命伦理学之间的相互作用,以探讨使用循证医学可能出现的伦理冲突,然后从哲学家保罗·利科提出的叙事伦理模型的角度进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Dialogue between bioethics and evidence- based medicine, a narrative ethics perspective].

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) is the methodological paradigm of Western medicine today. EBM is expected to reduce the use of intuition and to promote the use of scientific evidence, in the clinical decision-making process. Benefits of EBM in clinical practice are thoroughly documented, however, there are also critics. Among other issues, EBM is thought to contribute to an excessive reductionism, to neglect context variables and individual attributes involved in the physician-patient relationship. All the above could lead to several bioethical conflicts. This work consists in a literature review that examines the interaction between EBM and Bioethics in a reciprocity frame, in order to approach possible ethical conflicts that emerge with the use of EBM, and later analyze them from the perspective of the Narrative Ethics model, proposed by the philosopher Paul Ricoeur.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista medica de Chile
Revista medica de Chile 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista Médica de Chile publica trabajos originales sobre temas de interés médico y de Ciencias Biomédicas, dando preferencia a los relacionados con la Medicina Interna y sus especialidades derivadas. Publicada mensualmente, desde 1872, por la Sociedad Médica de Santiago. La abreviatura de su título es Rev Med Chile, que debe ser usado en bibliografías, notas al pié de página, leyendas y referencias bibliográficas.
期刊最新文献
[Being Depressed or Having Depression. The biomedical model and the difference between mood and illness]. Chronic angina secondary to Takayasu arteritis. Report of one case. [Single-pass albumin dialysis as treatment of acute on chronic liver failure during COVID-19 pneumonia. report of one case]. [The perception of teachers and students about clinical reasoning in health care careers]. [Knowing better, knowing the why, and knowing how to do: assumptions of depression in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1