Ali Yüce, Niyazi İğde, Tuğrul Ergün, Abdulhamit Mısır
{"title":"YouTube提供的髌股不稳定信息不足。","authors":"Ali Yüce, Niyazi İğde, Tuğrul Ergün, Abdulhamit Mısır","doi":"10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Videos uploaded to YouTube do not go through a review process, and therefore, videos related to patellofemoral instability may have little educational value. The purpose of this study was to assess the educational quality of YouTube videos regarding patellofemoral instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard search was performed on the YouTube database using the following terms: \"unstable kneecap,\" \"patellar instability,\" \"patellofemoral instability,\" \"kneecap dislocation,\" and \"patellar dislocation,\" and the top 50 videos based on the \"relevance\" assignment of the YouTube algorithm were included for analysis. The properties, content, and source of each video were recorded. The educational quality of videos was analyzed according to scores obtained using DISCERN, the criteria of Journal of the American Medical Association, Global Quality Score, and Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score, and the quality of the videos was evaluated according to the groupings of these scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 videos were identified, of which 89 were included in the study for analysis. The mean video duration was 11.72 ± 22.03 minutes. The median number of views was 4516.5 (range, 3-6 044 971). The content of the videos was disease-specific in 60%, 20% were related to surgical technique or approach, and 14.1% were exercise videos. Most of the videos were uploaded by physicians (33.7%). The Global Quality Score and DISCERN scores were significantly correlated with video duration. The Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score was significantly correlated with video duration, number of views, view rate, likes, and Video Power Index. According to the DISCERN classification, 69.9% of the videos were very insufficient or insufficient. According to the Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score, 65.2% of videos were evaluated as very low or low. According to the Global Quality Score, 60.7% of videos were rated as poor quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of YouTube videos about Patellofemoral instability is insufficient. It was found that viewers tend to watch short and low-quality videos.</p>","PeriodicalId":7097,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/d4/aott-56-5-306.PMC9682546.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"YouTube provides insufficient information on patellofemoral instability.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Yüce, Niyazi İğde, Tuğrul Ergün, Abdulhamit Mısır\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Videos uploaded to YouTube do not go through a review process, and therefore, videos related to patellofemoral instability may have little educational value. The purpose of this study was to assess the educational quality of YouTube videos regarding patellofemoral instability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standard search was performed on the YouTube database using the following terms: \\\"unstable kneecap,\\\" \\\"patellar instability,\\\" \\\"patellofemoral instability,\\\" \\\"kneecap dislocation,\\\" and \\\"patellar dislocation,\\\" and the top 50 videos based on the \\\"relevance\\\" assignment of the YouTube algorithm were included for analysis. The properties, content, and source of each video were recorded. The educational quality of videos was analyzed according to scores obtained using DISCERN, the criteria of Journal of the American Medical Association, Global Quality Score, and Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score, and the quality of the videos was evaluated according to the groupings of these scoring systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 videos were identified, of which 89 were included in the study for analysis. The mean video duration was 11.72 ± 22.03 minutes. The median number of views was 4516.5 (range, 3-6 044 971). The content of the videos was disease-specific in 60%, 20% were related to surgical technique or approach, and 14.1% were exercise videos. Most of the videos were uploaded by physicians (33.7%). The Global Quality Score and DISCERN scores were significantly correlated with video duration. The Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score was significantly correlated with video duration, number of views, view rate, likes, and Video Power Index. According to the DISCERN classification, 69.9% of the videos were very insufficient or insufficient. According to the Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score, 65.2% of videos were evaluated as very low or low. According to the Global Quality Score, 60.7% of videos were rated as poor quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of YouTube videos about Patellofemoral instability is insufficient. It was found that viewers tend to watch short and low-quality videos.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/d4/aott-56-5-306.PMC9682546.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2022.22005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:上传到YouTube的视频没有经过审查过程，因此，与髌骨不稳相关的视频可能没有什么教育价值。本研究的目的是评估YouTube上关于髌股不稳的视频的教育质量。方法:在YouTube数据库中使用以下术语进行标准搜索:“不稳定膝盖骨”、“髌骨不稳定”、“髌骨不稳定”、“膝盖骨脱位”和“髌骨脱位”，并根据YouTube算法的“相关性”分配纳入前50个视频进行分析。记录每个视频的属性、内容和来源。根据美国医学会杂志(Journal of American Medical Association)、全球质量评分(Global quality Score)和髌骨不稳定特定评分(Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score)的评分标准对视频的教学质量进行分析，并根据这些评分系统的分组对视频的质量进行评价。结果:共识别250个视频，其中89个被纳入研究分析。平均视频时长为11.72±22.03分钟。浏览量中位数为4516.5(范围3-6 044 971)。视频内容60%为疾病特异性视频，20%为手术技术或入路相关视频，14.1%为运动视频。上传视频最多的是医生(33.7%)。全球质量得分和辨别得分与视频时长显著相关。髌骨不稳特定评分与视频时长、观看次数、观看率、点赞和视频力量指数显著相关。根据DISCERN分类，69.9%的视频非常不充分或不充分。根据髌股不稳定特定评分，65.2%的视频被评价为非常低或低。根据全球质量评分，60.7%的视频被评为质量差。结论:YouTube上关于髌股不稳的视频质量不足。调查发现，观众倾向于观看短视频和低质量视频。
YouTube provides insufficient information on patellofemoral instability.
Objective: Videos uploaded to YouTube do not go through a review process, and therefore, videos related to patellofemoral instability may have little educational value. The purpose of this study was to assess the educational quality of YouTube videos regarding patellofemoral instability.
Methods: A standard search was performed on the YouTube database using the following terms: "unstable kneecap," "patellar instability," "patellofemoral instability," "kneecap dislocation," and "patellar dislocation," and the top 50 videos based on the "relevance" assignment of the YouTube algorithm were included for analysis. The properties, content, and source of each video were recorded. The educational quality of videos was analyzed according to scores obtained using DISCERN, the criteria of Journal of the American Medical Association, Global Quality Score, and Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score, and the quality of the videos was evaluated according to the groupings of these scoring systems.
Results: A total of 250 videos were identified, of which 89 were included in the study for analysis. The mean video duration was 11.72 ± 22.03 minutes. The median number of views was 4516.5 (range, 3-6 044 971). The content of the videos was disease-specific in 60%, 20% were related to surgical technique or approach, and 14.1% were exercise videos. Most of the videos were uploaded by physicians (33.7%). The Global Quality Score and DISCERN scores were significantly correlated with video duration. The Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score was significantly correlated with video duration, number of views, view rate, likes, and Video Power Index. According to the DISCERN classification, 69.9% of the videos were very insufficient or insufficient. According to the Patellofemoral Instability Specific Score, 65.2% of videos were evaluated as very low or low. According to the Global Quality Score, 60.7% of videos were rated as poor quality.
Conclusion: The quality of YouTube videos about Patellofemoral instability is insufficient. It was found that viewers tend to watch short and low-quality videos.
期刊介绍：
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica (AOTT) is an international, scientific, open access periodical published in accordance with independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review principles. The journal is the official publication of the Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, and Turkish Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. It is published bimonthly in January, March, May, July, September, and November. The publication language of the journal is English.
The aim of the journal is to publish original studies of the highest scientific and clinical value in orthopedics, traumatology, and related disciplines. The scope of the journal includes but not limited to diagnostic, treatment, and prevention methods related to orthopedics and traumatology. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica publishes clinical and basic research articles, case reports, personal clinical and technical notes, systematic reviews and meta-analyses and letters to the Editor. Proceedings of scientific meetings are also considered for publication.
The target audience of the journal includes healthcare professionals, physicians, and researchers who are interested or working in orthopedics and traumatology field, and related disciplines.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
