绿色化学技术评价指标优先度调查及层次分析法。

Q3 Medicine Environmental Health and Toxicology Pub Date : 2015-06-12 eCollection Date: 2015-01-01 DOI:10.5620/eht.s2015003
Sungjune Kim, Seokpyo Hong, Kilsoo Ahn, Sungyong Gong
{"title":"绿色化学技术评价指标优先度调查及层次分析法。","authors":"Sungjune Kim, Seokpyo Hong, Kilsoo Ahn, Sungyong Gong","doi":"10.5620/eht.s2015003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. Methods The results collected were subjected to an analytic hierarchy process to obtain the weights of the indicators and the proxy variables. Results These weights may prove useful in avoiding having to resort to qualitative means in absence of weights between indicators when integrating the results of quantitative assessment by indicator. Conclusions This study points to the limitations of current quantitative assessment techniques for green chemistry technologies and seeks to present the future direction for quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies.","PeriodicalId":11853,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health and Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/02/eht-30-s2015003.PMC4540126.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Sungjune Kim, Seokpyo Hong, Kilsoo Ahn, Sungyong Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.5620/eht.s2015003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. Methods The results collected were subjected to an analytic hierarchy process to obtain the weights of the indicators and the proxy variables. Results These weights may prove useful in avoiding having to resort to qualitative means in absence of weights between indicators when integrating the results of quantitative assessment by indicator. Conclusions This study points to the limitations of current quantitative assessment techniques for green chemistry technologies and seeks to present the future direction for quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Health and Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/02/eht-30-s2015003.PMC4540126.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Health and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.s2015003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5620/eht.s2015003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:通过咨询生态、化学、安全、公共卫生等领域的专家,提出绿色化学技术定量评价的指标和代理变量,并对各评价要素的相对重要性进行评价。方法:采用层次分析法确定各指标和代理变量的权重。结果:在以指标为单位对定量评价结果进行整合时,这些权重可以避免在指标之间缺乏权重而不得不诉诸定性手段。结论:本研究指出了目前绿色化学技术定量评估技术的局限性,并试图提出绿色化学技术定量评估的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Priority survey between indicators and analytic hierarchy process analysis for green chemistry technology assessment.
Objectives This study presents the indicators and proxy variables for the quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies and evaluates the relative importance of each assessment element by consulting experts from the fields of ecology, chemistry, safety, and public health. Methods The results collected were subjected to an analytic hierarchy process to obtain the weights of the indicators and the proxy variables. Results These weights may prove useful in avoiding having to resort to qualitative means in absence of weights between indicators when integrating the results of quantitative assessment by indicator. Conclusions This study points to the limitations of current quantitative assessment techniques for green chemistry technologies and seeks to present the future direction for quantitative assessment of green chemistry technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health and Toxicology
Environmental Health and Toxicology Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of relationship between the use of household products and atopic dermatitis in Seoul: focused on products with associated risks. Inhalation risk assessment of naphthalene emitted from deodorant balls in public toilets. Eye irritation tests of polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG) and chloromethylisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (CMIT/MIT) using a tissue model of reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium. Acute toxicity of copper hydroxide and glyphosate mixture in Clarias gariepinus: interaction and prediction using mixture assessment models. One more leap.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1