上颌从混合牙列到恒牙列缓慢扩张对牙骨骼的影响。

Q Medicine Australian Orthodontic Journal Pub Date : 2015-05-01
Elçin Esenlik, Meliha Rübendüz
{"title":"上颌从混合牙列到恒牙列缓慢扩张对牙骨骼的影响。","authors":"Elçin Esenlik,&nbsp;Meliha Rübendüz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of a modified slow maxillary expansion appliance (MSMEA) during the transition from the mixed to the permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty subjects presenting with posterior crossbites were divided into two groups. Twenty-three subjects were assigned to a treatment group (mean age: 9.45 years) and 17 subjects assigned to a control group (mean age: 9.25 years). An MSMEA with acrylic occlusal coverage limited to the palatal cusps was used to provide maxillary expansion. The mean slow expansion treatment period was 7.8 months, while the mean observation period continued for 14.8 months of a 22.6-month total study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial dental and skeletal effects were observed following treatment with the MSMEA. Most maxillary inter-molar and deciduous inter-second molar width increases were maintained in the permanent dentition (91% and 97%, respectively). Skeletal maxillary transverse dimensions, which increased by 2 mm after active expansion, were significantly greater (p < 0.001) when compared with the controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that an MSMEA provided orthopaedic and dental effects as a result of posterior crossbite correction. The effects of the appliance seen during the mixed dentition were maintained in the permanent dentition.</p>","PeriodicalId":55417,"journal":{"name":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"2-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the dentoskeletal effects of slow maxillary expansion from the mixed to the permanent dentition.\",\"authors\":\"Elçin Esenlik,&nbsp;Meliha Rübendüz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of a modified slow maxillary expansion appliance (MSMEA) during the transition from the mixed to the permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty subjects presenting with posterior crossbites were divided into two groups. Twenty-three subjects were assigned to a treatment group (mean age: 9.45 years) and 17 subjects assigned to a control group (mean age: 9.25 years). An MSMEA with acrylic occlusal coverage limited to the palatal cusps was used to provide maxillary expansion. The mean slow expansion treatment period was 7.8 months, while the mean observation period continued for 14.8 months of a 22.6-month total study period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Substantial dental and skeletal effects were observed following treatment with the MSMEA. Most maxillary inter-molar and deciduous inter-second molar width increases were maintained in the permanent dentition (91% and 97%, respectively). Skeletal maxillary transverse dimensions, which increased by 2 mm after active expansion, were significantly greater (p < 0.001) when compared with the controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggested that an MSMEA provided orthopaedic and dental effects as a result of posterior crossbite correction. The effects of the appliance seen during the mixed dentition were maintained in the permanent dentition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"2-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究的目的是评估改良的上颌缓慢扩张器(MSMEA)在从混合牙列到恒牙列过渡期间对牙骨骼的影响。方法:40例后侧交叉咬合患者分为两组。23名受试者被分为治疗组(平均年龄:9.45岁),17名受试者被分为对照组(平均年龄:9.25岁)。一个MSMEA与丙烯酸咬合覆盖仅限于腭尖提供上颌扩张。慢扩张治疗期平均7.8个月,平均观察期14.8个月,总研究期22.6个月。结果:MSMEA治疗后,观察到大量的牙齿和骨骼影响。恒牙列的上颌磨牙间和乳牙秒间磨牙宽度增加最多(分别为91%和97%)。与对照组相比,主动扩张后上颌骨横向尺寸增加2 mm,显著增加(p < 0.001)。结论:本研究结果提示MSMEA可作为后牙合矫正的结果,提供矫形和牙科效果。在混合牙列中观察到的矫治器的效果在恒牙列中保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An evaluation of the dentoskeletal effects of slow maxillary expansion from the mixed to the permanent dentition.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the dentoskeletal effects of a modified slow maxillary expansion appliance (MSMEA) during the transition from the mixed to the permanent dentition.

Methods: Forty subjects presenting with posterior crossbites were divided into two groups. Twenty-three subjects were assigned to a treatment group (mean age: 9.45 years) and 17 subjects assigned to a control group (mean age: 9.25 years). An MSMEA with acrylic occlusal coverage limited to the palatal cusps was used to provide maxillary expansion. The mean slow expansion treatment period was 7.8 months, while the mean observation period continued for 14.8 months of a 22.6-month total study period.

Results: Substantial dental and skeletal effects were observed following treatment with the MSMEA. Most maxillary inter-molar and deciduous inter-second molar width increases were maintained in the permanent dentition (91% and 97%, respectively). Skeletal maxillary transverse dimensions, which increased by 2 mm after active expansion, were significantly greater (p < 0.001) when compared with the controls.

Conclusion: The findings suggested that an MSMEA provided orthopaedic and dental effects as a result of posterior crossbite correction. The effects of the appliance seen during the mixed dentition were maintained in the permanent dentition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Orthodontic Journal
Australian Orthodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.48
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Minimizing publication bias. Looking backwards into the Future of Orthodontics. Orthodontic Education. Australian Orthodontists: are they "with it". The role of the foundation in Australian Orthodontic education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1