肝切除术联合术中射频消融术治疗多发性肝细胞癌。

Seok Joon Lee, Eung-Ho Cho, Ryounggo Kim, Young Han Kim, Chang-Sup Lim, Sang Bum Kim
{"title":"肝切除术联合术中射频消融术治疗多发性肝细胞癌。","authors":"Seok Joon Lee,&nbsp;Eung-Ho Cho,&nbsp;Ryounggo Kim,&nbsp;Young Han Kim,&nbsp;Chang-Sup Lim,&nbsp;Sang Bum Kim","doi":"10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>We compared the efficacy and safety of a hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation to those of wider extent hepatectomy, alone, in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2004 and December 2013, 78 patients with multiple HCCs underwent surgery. 25 patients were treated by hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (group A), and 53 underwent hepatectomy only (group B). We retrospectively analyzed medical records to compare the clinical features of these two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in group A had more limited resections (less than 2 segments) than those in group B (p<0.001). Patients in group A also tended to have fewer red blood cell transfusions than those in group B (p=0.060). Liver function- and surgery-related complications occurred only in group B. There were no in-hospital mortalities in both groups. The overall survival and disease-free survival outcomes were not significantly different between groups A and B (p=0.177 and p=0.305, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hepatectomy combined with intraoperative RFA could be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with multiple HCCs, comparable to extended hepatectomy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":91136,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":"19 3","pages":"98-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.98","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas.\",\"authors\":\"Seok Joon Lee,&nbsp;Eung-Ho Cho,&nbsp;Ryounggo Kim,&nbsp;Young Han Kim,&nbsp;Chang-Sup Lim,&nbsp;Sang Bum Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>We compared the efficacy and safety of a hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation to those of wider extent hepatectomy, alone, in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2004 and December 2013, 78 patients with multiple HCCs underwent surgery. 25 patients were treated by hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (group A), and 53 underwent hepatectomy only (group B). We retrospectively analyzed medical records to compare the clinical features of these two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in group A had more limited resections (less than 2 segments) than those in group B (p<0.001). Patients in group A also tended to have fewer red blood cell transfusions than those in group B (p=0.060). Liver function- and surgery-related complications occurred only in group B. There were no in-hospital mortalities in both groups. The overall survival and disease-free survival outcomes were not significantly different between groups A and B (p=0.177 and p=0.305, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hepatectomy combined with intraoperative RFA could be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with multiple HCCs, comparable to extended hepatectomy alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"98-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.98\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2015/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.3.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2015/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景/目的:我们比较了在多发性肝细胞癌(hcc)患者中肝切除术联合术中射频消融与单纯大范围肝切除术的疗效和安全性。方法:2004年1月至2013年12月,78例多发性hcc患者接受手术治疗。A组25例行肝切除联合术中射频消融(RFA), B组53例仅行肝切除。我们回顾性分析两组的病历,比较两组的临床特点。结果:与B组相比,A组患者的切除范围更有限(小于2节段)。结论:肝切除术联合术中射频消融术是多发hcc患者安全有效的治疗选择,与单纯扩大肝切除术相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas.

Backgrounds/aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of a hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation to those of wider extent hepatectomy, alone, in patients with multiple hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

Methods: Between January 2004 and December 2013, 78 patients with multiple HCCs underwent surgery. 25 patients were treated by hepatectomy, combined with intraoperative radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (group A), and 53 underwent hepatectomy only (group B). We retrospectively analyzed medical records to compare the clinical features of these two groups.

Results: Patients in group A had more limited resections (less than 2 segments) than those in group B (p<0.001). Patients in group A also tended to have fewer red blood cell transfusions than those in group B (p=0.060). Liver function- and surgery-related complications occurred only in group B. There were no in-hospital mortalities in both groups. The overall survival and disease-free survival outcomes were not significantly different between groups A and B (p=0.177 and p=0.305, respectively).

Conclusions: Hepatectomy combined with intraoperative RFA could be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with multiple HCCs, comparable to extended hepatectomy alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in a young female: treatment with portal vein embolization and liver trisectonectomy Mixed lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder Standardized surgical techniques for adult living donor liver transplantation using a modified right lobe graft: a video presentation from bench to reperfusion Efficacy evaluation of SurgiGuard® in partially hepatectomized pigs Aggressive surgical resection for concomitant liver and lung metastasis in colorectal cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1