[利福平栓治疗肺结核的临床体会]。

Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis] Pub Date : 2015-06-01
Noriyuki Tsubota, Shigeatsu Tanimukai
{"title":"[利福平栓治疗肺结核的临床体会]。","authors":"Noriyuki Tsubota,&nbsp;Shigeatsu Tanimukai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The usefulness of a rifampicin (RFP) suppository for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis was examined in patients who had difficulty with oral consumption of medication.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Among inpatients receiving first-time treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis susceptible to both isoniazid (INH) and RFP, and who underwent standard 3- or 4-drug treatments including INH and RFP, we compared the number of days required for obtaining two and three consecutive negative sputum smears and cultures, respectively, in patients who received hospital-made suppositories or standard oral RFP administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between groups in the number of days required for negative cultures and smears; although the times were equivalent, there were more number of elderly patients and those in generally poor condition in the RFP suppository group than the oral intake group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFP suppositories may be one method for administration of standard tuberculosis treatment in patients with difficulty in oral consumption of medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":17997,"journal":{"name":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","volume":"90 6","pages":"543-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[A CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF RIFAMPICIN SUPPOSITORY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS].\",\"authors\":\"Noriyuki Tsubota,&nbsp;Shigeatsu Tanimukai\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The usefulness of a rifampicin (RFP) suppository for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis was examined in patients who had difficulty with oral consumption of medication.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Among inpatients receiving first-time treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis susceptible to both isoniazid (INH) and RFP, and who underwent standard 3- or 4-drug treatments including INH and RFP, we compared the number of days required for obtaining two and three consecutive negative sputum smears and cultures, respectively, in patients who received hospital-made suppositories or standard oral RFP administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference between groups in the number of days required for negative cultures and smears; although the times were equivalent, there were more number of elderly patients and those in generally poor condition in the RFP suppository group than the oral intake group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RFP suppositories may be one method for administration of standard tuberculosis treatment in patients with difficulty in oral consumption of medication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]\",\"volume\":\"90 6\",\"pages\":\"543-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kekkaku : [Tuberculosis]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨利福平(RFP)栓剂对口服用药困难的肺结核患者的治疗作用。对象和方法:在首次接受异烟肼(INH)和RFP敏感的肺结核住院患者中,以及接受包括INH和RFP在内的标准3种或4种药物治疗的患者中,我们比较了接受医院自制栓剂或标准口服RFP的患者连续两次和三次痰涂片和培养阴性所需的天数。结果:各组间阴性培养和涂片所需天数无显著差异;虽然次数相同,但RFP栓剂组的老年患者和一般情况较差的患者数量多于口服摄入组。结论:RFP栓剂可作为口服用药困难患者标准结核病治疗的一种给药方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[A CLINICAL EXPERIENCE OF RIFAMPICIN SUPPOSITORY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS].

Purpose: The usefulness of a rifampicin (RFP) suppository for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis was examined in patients who had difficulty with oral consumption of medication.

Subjects and methods: Among inpatients receiving first-time treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis susceptible to both isoniazid (INH) and RFP, and who underwent standard 3- or 4-drug treatments including INH and RFP, we compared the number of days required for obtaining two and three consecutive negative sputum smears and cultures, respectively, in patients who received hospital-made suppositories or standard oral RFP administration.

Results: There was no significant difference between groups in the number of days required for negative cultures and smears; although the times were equivalent, there were more number of elderly patients and those in generally poor condition in the RFP suppository group than the oral intake group.

Conclusion: RFP suppositories may be one method for administration of standard tuberculosis treatment in patients with difficulty in oral consumption of medication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Surgical treatment of tuberculosis]. [Pulmonary fibrosis]. [CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 115 PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS PATIENTS WITH SPUTUM SMEAR-NEGATIVE]. [ESTIMATION OF POSITIVE RATES OF INTERFERON-GAMMA RELEASE ASSAY BY AGE GROUP IN JAPAN]. [COMPARISON OF TUBERCULOSIS SURVEILLANCE SYSTEMS IN JAPAN AND LOW-INCIDENCE COUNTRIES: INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1