多伤门诊医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及因素结构。

Laura Boxley, Jennifer M Flaherty, Robert J Spencer, Lauren L Drag, Percival H Pangilinan, Linas A Bieliauskas
{"title":"多伤门诊医院焦虑抑郁量表的信度及因素结构。","authors":"Laura Boxley,&nbsp;Jennifer M Flaherty,&nbsp;Robert J Spencer,&nbsp;Lauren L Drag,&nbsp;Percival H Pangilinan,&nbsp;Linas A Bieliauskas","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a brief self-report measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. This study examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the HADS among Veterans in a polytrauma/traumatic brain injury clinic. The sample consisted of 312 Veterans. A confirmatory factor analysis of the depression and anxiety subscales showed, not surprisingly, that the two factors were highly correlated (r = 0.7). Goodness of fit statistics for the two-factor model were acceptable (root mean square error of approximation = 0.06, comparative fit index = 0.94). The HADS demonstrated very good reliability overall (alpha = 0.89) and for the individual subscales (alpha = 0.84). This study supports the use of the HADS as a screen for depression and anxiety in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury in a Veteran population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":"873-880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0088","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Boxley,&nbsp;Jennifer M Flaherty,&nbsp;Robert J Spencer,&nbsp;Lauren L Drag,&nbsp;Percival H Pangilinan,&nbsp;Linas A Bieliauskas\",\"doi\":\"10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a brief self-report measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. This study examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the HADS among Veterans in a polytrauma/traumatic brain injury clinic. The sample consisted of 312 Veterans. A confirmatory factor analysis of the depression and anxiety subscales showed, not surprisingly, that the two factors were highly correlated (r = 0.7). Goodness of fit statistics for the two-factor model were acceptable (root mean square error of approximation = 0.06, comparative fit index = 0.94). The HADS demonstrated very good reliability overall (alpha = 0.89) and for the individual subscales (alpha = 0.84). This study supports the use of the HADS as a screen for depression and anxiety in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury in a Veteran population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"873-880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0088\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.05.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)是一种简短的自我报告焦虑和抑郁症状的测量方法。本研究旨在探讨多伤/外伤性脑损伤门诊退伍军人HADS的内部一致性和因素结构。样本包括312名退伍军人。抑郁和焦虑亚量表的验证性因素分析显示,这两个因素高度相关(r = 0.7),这并不奇怪。双因素模型的拟合优度统计可接受(近似均方根误差= 0.06,比较拟合指数= 0.94)。HADS的总体可靠性(alpha = 0.89)和单个子量表(alpha = 0.84)均表现出非常好的可靠性。本研究支持在退伍军人轻度创伤性脑损伤评估中使用HADS作为抑郁和焦虑的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and factor structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a polytrauma clinic.

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a brief self-report measure of anxiety and depression symptoms. This study examined the internal consistency and factor structure of the HADS among Veterans in a polytrauma/traumatic brain injury clinic. The sample consisted of 312 Veterans. A confirmatory factor analysis of the depression and anxiety subscales showed, not surprisingly, that the two factors were highly correlated (r = 0.7). Goodness of fit statistics for the two-factor model were acceptable (root mean square error of approximation = 0.06, comparative fit index = 0.94). The HADS demonstrated very good reliability overall (alpha = 0.89) and for the individual subscales (alpha = 0.84). This study supports the use of the HADS as a screen for depression and anxiety in the assessment of mild traumatic brain injury in a Veteran population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bodies in Motion Chronic Effects of Exposure to High-Intensity Blasts: Results of Tests of Central Auditory Processing Relationship between symptoms and family relationships in Veterans with serious mental illness Pain and psychiatric comorbidities among two groups of Iraq and Afghanistan era Veterans. Effects of cognitive load and prosthetic liner on volitional response times to vibrotactile feedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1