退伍军人健康管理局的创伤性脑损伤临床提示筛选和评估:实践模式。

Heather G Belanger, Gail Powell-Cope, Andrea M Spehar, Mark McCranie, S Angelina Klanchar, Ruth Yoash-Gantz, Judith B Kosasih, Joel Scholten
{"title":"退伍军人健康管理局的创伤性脑损伤临床提示筛选和评估:实践模式。","authors":"Heather G Belanger,&nbsp;Gail Powell-Cope,&nbsp;Andrea M Spehar,&nbsp;Mark McCranie,&nbsp;S Angelina Klanchar,&nbsp;Ruth Yoash-Gantz,&nbsp;Judith B Kosasih,&nbsp;Joel Scholten","doi":"10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goals of this study were to describe clinical practice patterns associated with the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation (CTBIE) and determine whether practice patterns vary by patient, provider, or facility characteristics. Veterans (N = 614) who had initial healthcare visits between 2008, and 2011 and who had previously completed the VHA's traumatic brain injury (TBI) screen and subsequent CTBIE were drawn from a national database. Participants were primarily male (95%) with a mean age of 29.8 yr (standard deviation = 8). Chart reviews were conducted on a random sample of charts with completed CTBIEs from 21 sites. Using a cross-sectional design, patient- and facility-specific variables were investigated as potential predictors of practice variation. During the study period, 79% of patients in this national sample were screened within 1 d of their initial healthcare visit and 65% were evaluated via CTBIE within 30 d of screening. Provider and participant characteristics were generally not associated with timeliness. The CTBIE was completed by individuals versus teams at comparable rates. Much of what occurred during the evaluation, beyond TBI-specific procedures, were medical assessments, such as review of medications and other substances.</p>","PeriodicalId":50065,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","volume":"53 6","pages":"767-780"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0187","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Veterans Health Administration's traumatic brain injury clinical reminder screen and evaluation: Practice patterns.\",\"authors\":\"Heather G Belanger,&nbsp;Gail Powell-Cope,&nbsp;Andrea M Spehar,&nbsp;Mark McCranie,&nbsp;S Angelina Klanchar,&nbsp;Ruth Yoash-Gantz,&nbsp;Judith B Kosasih,&nbsp;Joel Scholten\",\"doi\":\"10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goals of this study were to describe clinical practice patterns associated with the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation (CTBIE) and determine whether practice patterns vary by patient, provider, or facility characteristics. Veterans (N = 614) who had initial healthcare visits between 2008, and 2011 and who had previously completed the VHA's traumatic brain injury (TBI) screen and subsequent CTBIE were drawn from a national database. Participants were primarily male (95%) with a mean age of 29.8 yr (standard deviation = 8). Chart reviews were conducted on a random sample of charts with completed CTBIEs from 21 sites. Using a cross-sectional design, patient- and facility-specific variables were investigated as potential predictors of practice variation. During the study period, 79% of patients in this national sample were screened within 1 d of their initial healthcare visit and 65% were evaluated via CTBIE within 30 d of screening. Provider and participant characteristics were generally not associated with timeliness. The CTBIE was completed by individuals versus teams at comparable rates. Much of what occurred during the evaluation, beyond TBI-specific procedures, were medical assessments, such as review of medications and other substances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"767-780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0187\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2015.09.0187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究的目的是描述与退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)创伤性脑损伤综合评估(CTBIE)相关的临床实践模式,并确定实践模式是否因患者、提供者或设施特征而异。从国家数据库中抽取了2008年至2011年间首次就诊的退伍军人(N = 614),他们之前完成了VHA的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)筛查和随后的CTBIE。参与者主要为男性(95%),平均年龄为29.8岁(标准差= 8)。对来自21个地点的完成ctbi的随机样本进行图表回顾。采用横断面设计,研究了患者和机构特定变量作为实践变化的潜在预测因子。在研究期间,该国家样本中79%的患者在首次医疗保健访问后1天内进行了筛查,65%的患者在筛查后30天内通过CTBIE进行了评估。提供者和参与者的特征通常与及时性无关。CTBIE是由个人和团队以相当的比率完成的。在评估过程中,除了具体的创伤性脑损伤程序外,大部分都是医疗评估,例如对药物和其他物质的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Veterans Health Administration's traumatic brain injury clinical reminder screen and evaluation: Practice patterns.

The goals of this study were to describe clinical practice patterns associated with the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) Comprehensive Traumatic Brain Injury Evaluation (CTBIE) and determine whether practice patterns vary by patient, provider, or facility characteristics. Veterans (N = 614) who had initial healthcare visits between 2008, and 2011 and who had previously completed the VHA's traumatic brain injury (TBI) screen and subsequent CTBIE were drawn from a national database. Participants were primarily male (95%) with a mean age of 29.8 yr (standard deviation = 8). Chart reviews were conducted on a random sample of charts with completed CTBIEs from 21 sites. Using a cross-sectional design, patient- and facility-specific variables were investigated as potential predictors of practice variation. During the study period, 79% of patients in this national sample were screened within 1 d of their initial healthcare visit and 65% were evaluated via CTBIE within 30 d of screening. Provider and participant characteristics were generally not associated with timeliness. The CTBIE was completed by individuals versus teams at comparable rates. Much of what occurred during the evaluation, beyond TBI-specific procedures, were medical assessments, such as review of medications and other substances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.64
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bodies in Motion Chronic Effects of Exposure to High-Intensity Blasts: Results of Tests of Central Auditory Processing Relationship between symptoms and family relationships in Veterans with serious mental illness Pain and psychiatric comorbidities among two groups of Iraq and Afghanistan era Veterans. Effects of cognitive load and prosthetic liner on volitional response times to vibrotactile feedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1