预测部分发作性癫痫从辅助治疗转换为醋酸埃斯卡巴西平800毫克每日1次的单一治疗的疗效。

IF 3.1 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications Pub Date : 2017-06-27 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CPAA.S133815
Soujanya Sunkaraneni, Julie A Passarell, Elizabeth A Ludwig, Jill Fiedler-Kelly, Janet K Pitner, Todd A Grinnell, David Blum
{"title":"预测部分发作性癫痫从辅助治疗转换为醋酸埃斯卡巴西平800毫克每日1次的单一治疗的疗效。","authors":"Soujanya Sunkaraneni,&nbsp;Julie A Passarell,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Ludwig,&nbsp;Jill Fiedler-Kelly,&nbsp;Janet K Pitner,&nbsp;Todd A Grinnell,&nbsp;David Blum","doi":"10.2147/CPAA.S133815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD) oral antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for partial-onset seizures (POS). Clinical studies of gradual conversion to ESL 1,200 and 1,600 mg QD monotherapies were previously conducted in patients with POS who were not well-controlled by 1 or 2 AEDs. This report describes modeling and simulation of plasma eslicarbazepine (primary active metabolite of ESL) concentrations and time to monotherapy study exit to predict efficacy for conversion to ESL monotherapy at a lower dose of 800 mg, as an option for patients requiring or not tolerating higher doses since this regimen is effective in adjunctive therapy for POS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model for ESL monotherapy was used to predict minimum plasma eslicarbazepine concentration (<i>C</i><sub>min</sub>) in 1,500 virtual patients taking 1 (n=1,000) or 2 (n=500) AEDs at baseline, treated with ESL 400 mg QD for 1 week, followed by 800 mg QD for 17 weeks (similar to ESL monotherapy trials where the other AEDs were withdrawn during the first 6 weeks following titration to the randomized ESL dose). Model-predicted <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> as a time-varying covariate and number of baseline AEDs were used to determine the weekly probability of each patient meeting exit criteria (65.3% threshold) indicative of worsening seizure control in 500 simulated ESL monotherapy trials. A previously developed extended Cox proportional hazards exposure-response model was used to relate time-varying eslicarbazepine exposure to the time to study exit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For virtual patients receiving ESL monotherapy (800 mg QD), the 95% upper prediction limit for exit rate at 112 days of 34.9% in patients taking 1 AED at baseline was well below the 65.3% threshold from historical control trials, while the estimate for patients taking 2 AEDs (70.6%) was slightly above the historical control threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model-based assessment supports conversion to ESL 800 mg QD monotherapy for POS in adults taking 1 AED. For patients taking 2 concomitant AEDs, however, prescribers should consider maintenance doses of 1,200 or 1,600 mg ESL QD to reduce the likelihood of seizure worsening if conversion to ESL monotherapy is contemplated.</p>","PeriodicalId":10406,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","volume":"9 ","pages":"65-72"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S133815","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of efficacy for conversion from adjunctive therapy to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg once daily for partial-onset epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Soujanya Sunkaraneni,&nbsp;Julie A Passarell,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Ludwig,&nbsp;Jill Fiedler-Kelly,&nbsp;Janet K Pitner,&nbsp;Todd A Grinnell,&nbsp;David Blum\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPAA.S133815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD) oral antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for partial-onset seizures (POS). Clinical studies of gradual conversion to ESL 1,200 and 1,600 mg QD monotherapies were previously conducted in patients with POS who were not well-controlled by 1 or 2 AEDs. This report describes modeling and simulation of plasma eslicarbazepine (primary active metabolite of ESL) concentrations and time to monotherapy study exit to predict efficacy for conversion to ESL monotherapy at a lower dose of 800 mg, as an option for patients requiring or not tolerating higher doses since this regimen is effective in adjunctive therapy for POS.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model for ESL monotherapy was used to predict minimum plasma eslicarbazepine concentration (<i>C</i><sub>min</sub>) in 1,500 virtual patients taking 1 (n=1,000) or 2 (n=500) AEDs at baseline, treated with ESL 400 mg QD for 1 week, followed by 800 mg QD for 17 weeks (similar to ESL monotherapy trials where the other AEDs were withdrawn during the first 6 weeks following titration to the randomized ESL dose). Model-predicted <i>C</i><sub>min</sub> as a time-varying covariate and number of baseline AEDs were used to determine the weekly probability of each patient meeting exit criteria (65.3% threshold) indicative of worsening seizure control in 500 simulated ESL monotherapy trials. A previously developed extended Cox proportional hazards exposure-response model was used to relate time-varying eslicarbazepine exposure to the time to study exit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For virtual patients receiving ESL monotherapy (800 mg QD), the 95% upper prediction limit for exit rate at 112 days of 34.9% in patients taking 1 AED at baseline was well below the 65.3% threshold from historical control trials, while the estimate for patients taking 2 AEDs (70.6%) was slightly above the historical control threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This model-based assessment supports conversion to ESL 800 mg QD monotherapy for POS in adults taking 1 AED. For patients taking 2 concomitant AEDs, however, prescribers should consider maintenance doses of 1,200 or 1,600 mg ESL QD to reduce the likelihood of seizure worsening if conversion to ESL monotherapy is contemplated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"65-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/CPAA.S133815\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S133815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S133815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:醋酸埃斯卡巴西平(ESL)是一种每日一次(QD)口服抗癫痫药物(AED),适用于部分发作性癫痫发作(POS)。临床研究逐渐转换为ESL 1200和1600 mg QD单药治疗,以前曾在1或2个aed控制不佳的POS患者中进行过。本报告描述了血浆eslicarbazepine (ESL的主要活性代谢物)浓度和单药治疗研究结束时间的建模和模拟,以预测转换为低剂量800 mg ESL单药治疗的疗效,作为需要或不耐受高剂量的患者的选择,因为该方案是poss的有效辅助治疗。先前开发的ESL单药治疗人群药代动力学模型用于预测1500名虚拟患者的最低血浆eslicarbazepine浓度(Cmin),这些患者在基线时服用1个(n= 1000)或2个(n=500) aed,以ESL 400 mg QD治疗1周,随后以800 mg QD治疗17周(类似于ESL单药治疗试验,在滴定到随机ESL剂量后的前6周内停用其他aed)。在500个模拟ESL单药治疗试验中,使用模型预测的Cmin作为时变协变量和基线aed数量来确定每个患者达到退出标准的每周概率(65.3%阈值),表明癫痫控制恶化。使用先前开发的扩展Cox比例危害暴露-反应模型将时变埃司卡巴西平暴露与研究退出时间联系起来。结果:对于接受ESL单药治疗(800mg QD)的虚拟患者,基线时服用1个AED的患者在112天退出率的95%预测上限(34.9%)远低于历史对照试验的65.3%阈值,而服用2个AED的患者的估计(70.6%)略高于历史对照阈值。结论:这一基于模型的评估支持转换为ESL 800mg QD单药治疗服用1 AED的成人POS。然而,对于同时服用2种AEDs的患者,如果考虑转换为ESL单药治疗,开处方者应考虑维持剂量1200或1600 mg ESL QD,以减少癫痫发作恶化的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of efficacy for conversion from adjunctive therapy to monotherapy with eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg once daily for partial-onset epilepsy.

Purpose: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a once-daily (QD) oral antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for partial-onset seizures (POS). Clinical studies of gradual conversion to ESL 1,200 and 1,600 mg QD monotherapies were previously conducted in patients with POS who were not well-controlled by 1 or 2 AEDs. This report describes modeling and simulation of plasma eslicarbazepine (primary active metabolite of ESL) concentrations and time to monotherapy study exit to predict efficacy for conversion to ESL monotherapy at a lower dose of 800 mg, as an option for patients requiring or not tolerating higher doses since this regimen is effective in adjunctive therapy for POS.

Patients and methods: A previously developed population pharmacokinetic model for ESL monotherapy was used to predict minimum plasma eslicarbazepine concentration (Cmin) in 1,500 virtual patients taking 1 (n=1,000) or 2 (n=500) AEDs at baseline, treated with ESL 400 mg QD for 1 week, followed by 800 mg QD for 17 weeks (similar to ESL monotherapy trials where the other AEDs were withdrawn during the first 6 weeks following titration to the randomized ESL dose). Model-predicted Cmin as a time-varying covariate and number of baseline AEDs were used to determine the weekly probability of each patient meeting exit criteria (65.3% threshold) indicative of worsening seizure control in 500 simulated ESL monotherapy trials. A previously developed extended Cox proportional hazards exposure-response model was used to relate time-varying eslicarbazepine exposure to the time to study exit.

Results: For virtual patients receiving ESL monotherapy (800 mg QD), the 95% upper prediction limit for exit rate at 112 days of 34.9% in patients taking 1 AED at baseline was well below the 65.3% threshold from historical control trials, while the estimate for patients taking 2 AEDs (70.6%) was slightly above the historical control threshold.

Conclusion: This model-based assessment supports conversion to ESL 800 mg QD monotherapy for POS in adults taking 1 AED. For patients taking 2 concomitant AEDs, however, prescribers should consider maintenance doses of 1,200 or 1,600 mg ESL QD to reduce the likelihood of seizure worsening if conversion to ESL monotherapy is contemplated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Severe Hypertensive Response to Atropine Therapy for Bradycardia Associated with Dexmedetomidine: Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Dronedarone and Amiodarone Used During the Blind Period in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation Ipratropium Bromide/Salbutamol-Induced Acute Urinary Retention as a Result of Medication Error: A Case Report and Review of Cases in the Literature. Allopurinol-Induced Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS). Systematic Review of Safety of RTS,S with AS01 and AS02 Adjuvant Systems Using Data from Randomized Controlled Trials in Infants, Children, and Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1