印度原发性膝骨关节炎患者乌尔都语版oos的跨文化验证。

IF 2.3 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY International Journal of Rheumatology Pub Date : 2017-01-01 Epub Date: 2017-10-25 DOI:10.1155/2017/1206706
Mahamed Ateef, Sivachidambaram Kulandaivelan, Mazen Alqahtani
{"title":"印度原发性膝骨关节炎患者乌尔都语版oos的跨文化验证。","authors":"Mahamed Ateef,&nbsp;Sivachidambaram Kulandaivelan,&nbsp;Mazen Alqahtani","doi":"10.1155/2017/1206706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to translate a self-reported questionnaire (KOOS) from English to Urdu and then to see its internal consistency, agreement, test-retest reliability, and validity among primary OA knee patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>First, KOOS questionnaire was translated from English language to Urdu through standardized cross-cultural protocol. This translated version of KOOS was administered to 111 radiographically diagnosed primary OA knee patients at two times with 48-hour interval in-between. Cronbach's alpha, floor and ceiling effect, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute agreement %, and Spearman correlation were used to fulfill our objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average time to administer this questionnaire was 20 minutes. There was good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.7246 to 0.9139. The absolute agreement of each item between two tests ranged from 81.08% to 98.20%. Test-retest reliability was excellent (\"<i>r</i>\" ranged from 0.9673 to 0.9782). There was no ceiling effect; however less than 4% floor effect was seen in two subscales. There was significant difference that existed between different X-ray grades in all subscales meaning good content validity for disease prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present results show that KOOS Urdu version is a reliable and valid measure for primary OA knee patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51715,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/1206706","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Validation of Urdu Version KOOS in Indian Population with Primary Knee Osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Mahamed Ateef,&nbsp;Sivachidambaram Kulandaivelan,&nbsp;Mazen Alqahtani\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2017/1206706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to translate a self-reported questionnaire (KOOS) from English to Urdu and then to see its internal consistency, agreement, test-retest reliability, and validity among primary OA knee patients.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>First, KOOS questionnaire was translated from English language to Urdu through standardized cross-cultural protocol. This translated version of KOOS was administered to 111 radiographically diagnosed primary OA knee patients at two times with 48-hour interval in-between. Cronbach's alpha, floor and ceiling effect, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute agreement %, and Spearman correlation were used to fulfill our objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average time to administer this questionnaire was 20 minutes. There was good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.7246 to 0.9139. The absolute agreement of each item between two tests ranged from 81.08% to 98.20%. Test-retest reliability was excellent (\\\"<i>r</i>\\\" ranged from 0.9673 to 0.9782). There was no ceiling effect; however less than 4% floor effect was seen in two subscales. There was significant difference that existed between different X-ray grades in all subscales meaning good content validity for disease prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present results show that KOOS Urdu version is a reliable and valid measure for primary OA knee patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2017/1206706\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1206706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/10/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1206706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是将一份自我报告问卷(oos)从英语翻译成乌尔都语,然后观察其在原发性OA膝关节患者中的内部一致性、一致性、重测信度和效度。方法:首先,通过标准化的跨文化协议将oos问卷从英语翻译成乌尔都语。对111名经放射学诊断为原发性OA膝关节患者进行了两次翻译版oos,每次间隔48小时。Cronbach’s alpha、下限和上限效应、类内相关系数(ICC)、绝对一致性%和Spearman相关来实现我们的目标。结果:填写问卷的平均时间为20分钟。内部一致性较好,Cronbach's alpha在0.7246 ~ 0.9139之间。两种测试结果的绝对一致性在81.08% ~ 98.20%之间。重测信度极好(“r”为0.9673 ~ 0.9782)。没有天花板效应;然而,两个分量表的底效应不足4%。不同x线分级在所有亚量表上均存在显著差异,说明对疾病预后的内容效度较好。结论:KOOS乌尔都语版本是一种可靠、有效的测量原发性OA膝关节患者的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cross-Cultural Validation of Urdu Version KOOS in Indian Population with Primary Knee Osteoarthritis.

Purpose: The primary aim of this study was to translate a self-reported questionnaire (KOOS) from English to Urdu and then to see its internal consistency, agreement, test-retest reliability, and validity among primary OA knee patients.

Methodology: First, KOOS questionnaire was translated from English language to Urdu through standardized cross-cultural protocol. This translated version of KOOS was administered to 111 radiographically diagnosed primary OA knee patients at two times with 48-hour interval in-between. Cronbach's alpha, floor and ceiling effect, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute agreement %, and Spearman correlation were used to fulfill our objectives.

Results: Average time to administer this questionnaire was 20 minutes. There was good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.7246 to 0.9139. The absolute agreement of each item between two tests ranged from 81.08% to 98.20%. Test-retest reliability was excellent ("r" ranged from 0.9673 to 0.9782). There was no ceiling effect; however less than 4% floor effect was seen in two subscales. There was significant difference that existed between different X-ray grades in all subscales meaning good content validity for disease prognosis.

Conclusion: The present results show that KOOS Urdu version is a reliable and valid measure for primary OA knee patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Observational Study on the Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease Secondary to Dermatomyositis and Antisynthetase Syndrome. Exploring the Psychiatric Manifestations of Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome: A Narrative Review Association of Baseline Serum Soluble Tumour Necrosis Factor Receptor Levels with the Response of Rheumatoid Arthritis to Janus Kinase Inhibitor Therapy. Primary Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) and ITP Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Modalities Association of Cytokine IL-17, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-12 Gene Polymorphisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1