风险暴露评估的认识论观点:个案研究。

Q3 Nursing Open Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2017-10-31 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874434601711010203
Daniele Chiffi, Paola Berchialla, Dario Gregori
{"title":"风险暴露评估的认识论观点:个案研究。","authors":"Daniele Chiffi,&nbsp;Paola Berchialla,&nbsp;Dario Gregori","doi":"10.2174/1874434601711010203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research in Health Risk Assessment is increasingly covering a preeminent role in health care studies. However, risk assessment faces the issue of properly measuring risk exposure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study has been to tackle some methodological issues regarding the risk assessment analysis in the health field, giving more emphasis to a philosophical and epistemological approach in order to show the difficulties in adopting suitable exposure assessment techniques.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Here, we present a methodological review and a critical discussion of foreign body injuries articles in child population as a case study. A Medline, Econlite and CIS bibliographic search was conducted considering the term \"foreign bodies\" only in \"children\" and \"risk\". Only English papers are considered. Further research on CDC, CPSC, DGSANCO databases has been performed. Different approaches in risk assessment are reviewed using four case-study papers with the purpose of pointing out their limitations.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ten papers are retrieved though literature review reporting risk estimate of foreign bodies injuries in children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering that different variables affecting the risk of choking injuries, like intrinsic characteristic of a product or the intensity levels at which children are exposed, and then it seems very difficult to correctly evaluate risk of injuries. For this reason, we have argued for an epistemological and holistic approach toward risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":38868,"journal":{"name":"Open Nursing Journal","volume":"11 ","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Epistemological View on Risk Exposure Assessment: A Case Study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Chiffi,&nbsp;Paola Berchialla,&nbsp;Dario Gregori\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874434601711010203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research in Health Risk Assessment is increasingly covering a preeminent role in health care studies. However, risk assessment faces the issue of properly measuring risk exposure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study has been to tackle some methodological issues regarding the risk assessment analysis in the health field, giving more emphasis to a philosophical and epistemological approach in order to show the difficulties in adopting suitable exposure assessment techniques.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Here, we present a methodological review and a critical discussion of foreign body injuries articles in child population as a case study. A Medline, Econlite and CIS bibliographic search was conducted considering the term \\\"foreign bodies\\\" only in \\\"children\\\" and \\\"risk\\\". Only English papers are considered. Further research on CDC, CPSC, DGSANCO databases has been performed. Different approaches in risk assessment are reviewed using four case-study papers with the purpose of pointing out their limitations.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ten papers are retrieved though literature review reporting risk estimate of foreign bodies injuries in children.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Considering that different variables affecting the risk of choking injuries, like intrinsic characteristic of a product or the intensity levels at which children are exposed, and then it seems very difficult to correctly evaluate risk of injuries. For this reason, we have argued for an epistemological and holistic approach toward risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"203-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5712636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601711010203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康风险评估研究在卫生保健研究中扮演着越来越重要的角色。然而,风险评估面临着如何正确度量风险暴露的问题。目的:本研究的目的是解决有关卫生领域风险评估分析的一些方法学问题,更加强调哲学和认识论的方法,以表明采用适当的暴露评估技术的困难。方法:在此,我们提出了一个方法学回顾和批判性的讨论,在儿童人群异物损伤的文章作为个案研究。在Medline、Econlite和CIS文献检索中,只考虑“儿童”和“风险”中的“异物”一词。只考虑英文论文。对CDC、CPSC、DGSANCO数据库进行了进一步的研究。在风险评估的不同方法进行审查,使用四个案例研究论文,目的是指出其局限性。结果:通过文献回顾,检索到10篇报道儿童异物损伤风险评估的论文。结论:考虑到影响窒息伤害风险的不同变量,如产品的内在特性或儿童暴露的强度水平,正确评估伤害风险似乎非常困难。出于这个原因,我们主张采用认识论和整体方法进行风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Epistemological View on Risk Exposure Assessment: A Case Study.

Background: Research in Health Risk Assessment is increasingly covering a preeminent role in health care studies. However, risk assessment faces the issue of properly measuring risk exposure.

Objective: The aim of the study has been to tackle some methodological issues regarding the risk assessment analysis in the health field, giving more emphasis to a philosophical and epistemological approach in order to show the difficulties in adopting suitable exposure assessment techniques.

Method: Here, we present a methodological review and a critical discussion of foreign body injuries articles in child population as a case study. A Medline, Econlite and CIS bibliographic search was conducted considering the term "foreign bodies" only in "children" and "risk". Only English papers are considered. Further research on CDC, CPSC, DGSANCO databases has been performed. Different approaches in risk assessment are reviewed using four case-study papers with the purpose of pointing out their limitations.

Result: Ten papers are retrieved though literature review reporting risk estimate of foreign bodies injuries in children.

Conclusion: Considering that different variables affecting the risk of choking injuries, like intrinsic characteristic of a product or the intensity levels at which children are exposed, and then it seems very difficult to correctly evaluate risk of injuries. For this reason, we have argued for an epistemological and holistic approach toward risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Nursing Journal
Open Nursing Journal Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Open Nursing Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited thematic issues in all areas of nursing. The Open Nursing Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide. We welcome papers related to nursing and midwifery, with specific relevance to health care practice, policy and research. We publish under the following themes: -Nursing and Midwifery practice -Education -Research methodology -Evidence based practice -New role in practice -Systematic reviews -Case studies -Ethical and professional issues -Management in health care -Sustainability in health and health care provision All authors should make clear how the implications of their paper for nursing, midwifery and health care practice. They should also clearly identify the ‘take home message’ from their paper.
期刊最新文献
Management Practices Promoting Sustained Implementation of the Quality Register Senior Alert for Older Adults in Municipal Care in Sweden. Nurse Managers' Emotional Intelligence and Effective Leadership: A Review of Current Evidence. Effectiveness of the "Create Sensitivity" Caring Model on Blood Glucose/ Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Quality of Life in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Depressive Symptoms and Complications Early after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Gender Differences. Persistent (Anxiety and Depression) Affected Academic Achievement and Absenteeism in Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1