国家疫苗接种计划——公共卫生和经济的成功案例。

Heini Salo, Terhi Kilpi
{"title":"国家疫苗接种计划——公共卫生和经济的成功案例。","authors":"Heini Salo,&nbsp;Terhi Kilpi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The savings in treatment costs generated by disease cases prevented by the national vaccination program exceed the costs of the vaccination program by at least 60 million euros. In addition, other costs due to contracting the illness are avoided. Vaccinations serve the purpose of both increasing well-being and releasing resources for other uses. Financial support of vaccinations through the health insurance system would be costly and targetted to those with the ability to pay. Public funds should be directed to the development of a vaccination program. New vaccines coming on the market are expensive. Adding a new vaccine to the vaccination program is based on scientific evidence-based expert assessments and cost-effectiveness. In addition to preliminary assessments carried out in support of decision-making, the National Institute of Health and Welfare monitors by using population-based health registers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the vaccination program. From the standpoint of transparency of decision-making it would be preferred that the decision-makers define a willingness to pay threshold below which an intervention would be accepted and lead to funding.</p>","PeriodicalId":72850,"journal":{"name":"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National vaccination program - a success story of public health and economy.\",\"authors\":\"Heini Salo,&nbsp;Terhi Kilpi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The savings in treatment costs generated by disease cases prevented by the national vaccination program exceed the costs of the vaccination program by at least 60 million euros. In addition, other costs due to contracting the illness are avoided. Vaccinations serve the purpose of both increasing well-being and releasing resources for other uses. Financial support of vaccinations through the health insurance system would be costly and targetted to those with the ability to pay. Public funds should be directed to the development of a vaccination program. New vaccines coming on the market are expensive. Adding a new vaccine to the vaccination program is based on scientific evidence-based expert assessments and cost-effectiveness. In addition to preliminary assessments carried out in support of decision-making, the National Institute of Health and Welfare monitors by using population-based health registers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the vaccination program. From the standpoint of transparency of decision-making it would be preferred that the decision-makers define a willingness to pay threshold below which an intervention would be accepted and lead to funding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过国家疫苗接种方案预防的疾病病例所节省的治疗费用至少比疫苗接种方案的费用多6000万欧元。此外,还避免了因感染疾病而产生的其他费用。接种疫苗的目的是增加福祉和释放资源用于其他用途。通过健康保险系统为疫苗接种提供财政支持将是昂贵的,而且针对的是那些有能力支付的人。公共资金应用于制定疫苗接种计划。新上市的疫苗价格昂贵。在疫苗接种规划中添加新疫苗是基于以科学为基础的专家评估和成本效益。除了为支持决策而进行的初步评估外,国家卫生和福利研究所还利用基于人口的健康登记来监测疫苗接种方案的效力和成本效益。从决策透明度的角度来看,决策者最好确定一个愿意支付的门槛,低于这个门槛,干预将被接受并导致供资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National vaccination program - a success story of public health and economy.

The savings in treatment costs generated by disease cases prevented by the national vaccination program exceed the costs of the vaccination program by at least 60 million euros. In addition, other costs due to contracting the illness are avoided. Vaccinations serve the purpose of both increasing well-being and releasing resources for other uses. Financial support of vaccinations through the health insurance system would be costly and targetted to those with the ability to pay. Public funds should be directed to the development of a vaccination program. New vaccines coming on the market are expensive. Adding a new vaccine to the vaccination program is based on scientific evidence-based expert assessments and cost-effectiveness. In addition to preliminary assessments carried out in support of decision-making, the National Institute of Health and Welfare monitors by using population-based health registers the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the vaccination program. From the standpoint of transparency of decision-making it would be preferred that the decision-makers define a willingness to pay threshold below which an intervention would be accepted and lead to funding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[AMMONIUM CHLORIDE POISONING]. [Ecological ethics]. [Alone]. [Personality disorders]. [Febrile seizures].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1