肿瘤临床研究定性资格标准的时间约束分析。

Zhe He, Zhiwei Chen, Jiang Bian
{"title":"肿瘤临床研究定性资格标准的时间约束分析。","authors":"Zhe He,&nbsp;Zhiwei Chen,&nbsp;Jiang Bian","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical studies, especially randomized controlled trials, generate gold-standard medical evidence. However, the lack of population representativeness of clinical studies has hampered their generalizability to the real-world population. Overly restrictive qualitative criteria are often applied to exclude patients. In this work, we develop a lexical-pattern-based tool to structure qualitative eligibility criteria with temporal constraints, with which we analyzed over 10,800 cancer clinical studies. Our results showed that restrictive temporal constraints are often applied on qualitative criteria in cancer studies, limiting the generalizability of their results.</p>","PeriodicalId":74563,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","volume":"2016 ","pages":"717-722"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822607","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Temporal Constraints in Qualitative Eligibility Criteria of Cancer Clinical Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Zhe He,&nbsp;Zhiwei Chen,&nbsp;Jiang Bian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical studies, especially randomized controlled trials, generate gold-standard medical evidence. However, the lack of population representativeness of clinical studies has hampered their generalizability to the real-world population. Overly restrictive qualitative criteria are often applied to exclude patients. In this work, we develop a lexical-pattern-based tool to structure qualitative eligibility criteria with temporal constraints, with which we analyzed over 10,800 cancer clinical studies. Our results showed that restrictive temporal constraints are often applied on qualitative criteria in cancer studies, limiting the generalizability of their results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"2016 \",\"pages\":\"717-722\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822607\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

临床研究,尤其是随机对照试验,产生了黄金标准的医学证据。然而,缺乏人群代表性的临床研究阻碍了其推广到现实世界的人群。过于严格的定性标准常常被用于排除患者。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个基于词汇模式的工具来构建具有时间约束的定性资格标准,我们分析了超过10,800个癌症临床研究。我们的研究结果表明,限制性的时间约束通常应用于癌症研究的定性标准,限制了其结果的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of Temporal Constraints in Qualitative Eligibility Criteria of Cancer Clinical Studies.

Clinical studies, especially randomized controlled trials, generate gold-standard medical evidence. However, the lack of population representativeness of clinical studies has hampered their generalizability to the real-world population. Overly restrictive qualitative criteria are often applied to exclude patients. In this work, we develop a lexical-pattern-based tool to structure qualitative eligibility criteria with temporal constraints, with which we analyzed over 10,800 cancer clinical studies. Our results showed that restrictive temporal constraints are often applied on qualitative criteria in cancer studies, limiting the generalizability of their results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interpreting Lung Cancer Health Disparity between African American Males and European American Males. Causal Explanation from Mild Cognitive Impairment Progression using Graph Neural Networks. Predicting HIV Diagnosis Among Emerging Adults Using Electronic Health Records and Health Survey Data in All of Us Research Program. A generalizable physiological model for detection of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia using Federated Learning. Harnessing Transfer Learning for Dementia Prediction: Leveraging Sex-Different Mild Cognitive Impairment Prognosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1