综合生物模拟实践:从物理学、哲学和数据/模型管理实践的考虑。

Cellular logistics Pub Date : 2017-11-29 eCollection Date: 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400
Gopal P Sarma, Victor Faundez
{"title":"综合生物模拟实践:从物理学、哲学和数据/模型管理实践的考虑。","authors":"Gopal P Sarma,&nbsp;Victor Faundez","doi":"10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrative biological simulations have a varied and controversial history in the biological sciences. From computational models of organelles, cells, and simple organisms, to physiological models of tissues, organ systems, and ecosystems, a diverse array of biological systems have been the target of large-scale computational modeling efforts. Nonetheless, these research agendas have yet to prove decisively their value among the broader community of theoretical and experimental biologists. In this commentary, we examine a range of philosophical and practical issues relevant to understanding the potential of integrative simulations. We discuss the role of theory and modeling in different areas of physics and suggest that certain sub-disciplines of physics provide useful cultural analogies for imagining the future role of simulations in biological research. We examine philosophical issues related to modeling which consistently arise in discussions about integrative simulations and suggest a pragmatic viewpoint that balances a belief in philosophy with the recognition of the relative infancy of our state of philosophical understanding. Finally, we discuss community workflow and publication practices to allow research to be readily discoverable and amenable to incorporation into simulations. We argue that there are aligned incentives in widespread adoption of practices which will both advance the needs of integrative simulation efforts as well as other contemporary trends in the biological sciences, ranging from open science and data sharing to improving reproducibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":72547,"journal":{"name":"Cellular logistics","volume":"7 4","pages":"e1392400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrative biological simulation praxis: Considerations from physics, philosophy, and data/model curation practices.\",\"authors\":\"Gopal P Sarma,&nbsp;Victor Faundez\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integrative biological simulations have a varied and controversial history in the biological sciences. From computational models of organelles, cells, and simple organisms, to physiological models of tissues, organ systems, and ecosystems, a diverse array of biological systems have been the target of large-scale computational modeling efforts. Nonetheless, these research agendas have yet to prove decisively their value among the broader community of theoretical and experimental biologists. In this commentary, we examine a range of philosophical and practical issues relevant to understanding the potential of integrative simulations. We discuss the role of theory and modeling in different areas of physics and suggest that certain sub-disciplines of physics provide useful cultural analogies for imagining the future role of simulations in biological research. We examine philosophical issues related to modeling which consistently arise in discussions about integrative simulations and suggest a pragmatic viewpoint that balances a belief in philosophy with the recognition of the relative infancy of our state of philosophical understanding. Finally, we discuss community workflow and publication practices to allow research to be readily discoverable and amenable to incorporation into simulations. We argue that there are aligned incentives in widespread adoption of practices which will both advance the needs of integrative simulation efforts as well as other contemporary trends in the biological sciences, ranging from open science and data sharing to improving reproducibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular logistics\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"e1392400\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular logistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2017/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21592799.2017.1392400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2017/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

综合生物模拟在生物科学中有着多种多样和有争议的历史。从细胞器、细胞和简单生物体的计算模型,到组织、器官系统和生态系统的生理模型,各种各样的生物系统已经成为大规模计算建模工作的目标。尽管如此,这些研究议程尚未在理论和实验生物学家的更广泛社区中证明其决定性的价值。在这篇评论中,我们研究了一系列与理解综合模拟潜力相关的哲学和实践问题。我们讨论了理论和建模在物理学不同领域中的作用,并提出物理学的某些子学科为想象模拟在生物学研究中的未来作用提供了有用的文化类比。我们研究了与建模相关的哲学问题,这些问题在关于综合模拟的讨论中不断出现,并提出了一种实用主义的观点,该观点平衡了对哲学的信仰与对我们哲学理解状态的相对婴儿期的认识。最后,我们讨论了社区工作流程和出版实践,以使研究能够很容易地发现并适应纳入模拟。我们认为,在广泛采用的实践中,有一致的激励措施,这将促进综合模拟工作的需求,以及生物科学中的其他当代趋势,从开放科学和数据共享到提高可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrative biological simulation praxis: Considerations from physics, philosophy, and data/model curation practices.

Integrative biological simulations have a varied and controversial history in the biological sciences. From computational models of organelles, cells, and simple organisms, to physiological models of tissues, organ systems, and ecosystems, a diverse array of biological systems have been the target of large-scale computational modeling efforts. Nonetheless, these research agendas have yet to prove decisively their value among the broader community of theoretical and experimental biologists. In this commentary, we examine a range of philosophical and practical issues relevant to understanding the potential of integrative simulations. We discuss the role of theory and modeling in different areas of physics and suggest that certain sub-disciplines of physics provide useful cultural analogies for imagining the future role of simulations in biological research. We examine philosophical issues related to modeling which consistently arise in discussions about integrative simulations and suggest a pragmatic viewpoint that balances a belief in philosophy with the recognition of the relative infancy of our state of philosophical understanding. Finally, we discuss community workflow and publication practices to allow research to be readily discoverable and amenable to incorporation into simulations. We argue that there are aligned incentives in widespread adoption of practices which will both advance the needs of integrative simulation efforts as well as other contemporary trends in the biological sciences, ranging from open science and data sharing to improving reproducibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vps34 and the Armus/TBC-2 Rab GAPs: Putting the brakes on the endosomal Rab5 and Rab7 GTPases. Integrative biological simulation praxis: Considerations from physics, philosophy, and data/model curation practices. Agents and networks to model the dynamic interactions of intracellular transport. How can biological modeling help cell biology? Amino acid and small GTPase regulation of mTORC1.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1