牙医对牙根尖牙周炎治疗方法选择的看法。

Clujul medical (1957) Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-01-15 DOI:10.15386/cjmed-789
Andreea Iuliana Kui, Anca Jiglău Labuneţ, Codruţa Popescu, Daniela Popa, Liana Lascu
{"title":"牙医对牙根尖牙周炎治疗方法选择的看法。","authors":"Andreea Iuliana Kui, Anca Jiglău Labuneţ, Codruţa Popescu, Daniela Popa, Liana Lascu","doi":"10.15386/cjmed-789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Therapeutic decision in dentistry is a complex cognitive process for the practitioners because it involves taking into consideration several factors, including patients' preferences. The hypothesis of this study was that apicoectomy might be indicated more often than necessary and in order to confirm or invalidate it a survey was designed. We also aimed to explore whether the preferences were associated or not with dentist-related or practice-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey included questions about treatment options in case of four scenarios, each one concerning an anterior and a posterior tooth with apical periodontitis, with or without previous endodontic treatment and also general questions, such as medical specialties, age and years of experience. The distribution of the questionnaires was done by email and direct distribution in the dental offices, in Cluj County, Romania.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After descriptive statistical analysis was performed, preferences rates were subjected to Chi-square test (including McNemar test for significance). Statistically significant differences were considered when p≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that dentists prefer nonsurgical endodontic treatment in case of a tooth with apical periodontitis. Apicoectomy was the second option treatment preferred by general dentists, oral and maxillo-facial surgeons, prosthodontists and endodontists.</p>","PeriodicalId":91233,"journal":{"name":"Clujul medical (1957)","volume":"91 1","pages":"98-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b2/d1/cm-91-98.PMC5808276.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dentists' perspectives on the choice of treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.\",\"authors\":\"Andreea Iuliana Kui, Anca Jiglău Labuneţ, Codruţa Popescu, Daniela Popa, Liana Lascu\",\"doi\":\"10.15386/cjmed-789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Therapeutic decision in dentistry is a complex cognitive process for the practitioners because it involves taking into consideration several factors, including patients' preferences. The hypothesis of this study was that apicoectomy might be indicated more often than necessary and in order to confirm or invalidate it a survey was designed. We also aimed to explore whether the preferences were associated or not with dentist-related or practice-related characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey included questions about treatment options in case of four scenarios, each one concerning an anterior and a posterior tooth with apical periodontitis, with or without previous endodontic treatment and also general questions, such as medical specialties, age and years of experience. The distribution of the questionnaires was done by email and direct distribution in the dental offices, in Cluj County, Romania.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After descriptive statistical analysis was performed, preferences rates were subjected to Chi-square test (including McNemar test for significance). Statistically significant differences were considered when p≤0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results indicate that dentists prefer nonsurgical endodontic treatment in case of a tooth with apical periodontitis. Apicoectomy was the second option treatment preferred by general dentists, oral and maxillo-facial surgeons, prosthodontists and endodontists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clujul medical (1957)\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"98-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b2/d1/cm-91-98.PMC5808276.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clujul medical (1957)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clujul medical (1957)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:牙科治疗决策对从业人员来说是一个复杂的认知过程,因为它需要考虑多种因素,包括患者的偏好。本研究的假设是,根尖切除术可能比必要的情况下更常被使用,为了证实或否定这一假设,我们设计了一项调查。我们还旨在探讨患者的偏好是否与牙医或牙科诊所的相关特征有关:调查包括四种情况下的治疗选择问题,每种情况都涉及一颗前牙和一颗后牙的根尖牙周炎,是否曾进行过牙髓治疗,还包括一般问题,如医学专业、年龄和工作年限。调查问卷是通过电子邮件和在罗马尼亚克卢日县的牙科诊所直接发放的:在进行描述性统计分析后,对偏好率进行了卡方检验(包括 McNemar 显著性检验)。当 p≤0.05 时,差异具有统计学意义:结果表明,牙医在牙根尖牙周炎的情况下更倾向于非手术牙髓治疗。牙根尖切除术是普通牙科医生、口腔颌面外科医生、口腔修复医生和牙髓病学家首选的第二种治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dentists' perspectives on the choice of treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis.

Background and aim: Therapeutic decision in dentistry is a complex cognitive process for the practitioners because it involves taking into consideration several factors, including patients' preferences. The hypothesis of this study was that apicoectomy might be indicated more often than necessary and in order to confirm or invalidate it a survey was designed. We also aimed to explore whether the preferences were associated or not with dentist-related or practice-related characteristics.

Methods: The survey included questions about treatment options in case of four scenarios, each one concerning an anterior and a posterior tooth with apical periodontitis, with or without previous endodontic treatment and also general questions, such as medical specialties, age and years of experience. The distribution of the questionnaires was done by email and direct distribution in the dental offices, in Cluj County, Romania.

Results: After descriptive statistical analysis was performed, preferences rates were subjected to Chi-square test (including McNemar test for significance). Statistically significant differences were considered when p≤0.05.

Conclusions: The results indicate that dentists prefer nonsurgical endodontic treatment in case of a tooth with apical periodontitis. Apicoectomy was the second option treatment preferred by general dentists, oral and maxillo-facial surgeons, prosthodontists and endodontists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oral health status and oral health related quality of life in adolescent workers. Clinical and endoscopic manifestations of gastrointestinal amyloidosis: a case series. Hemodynamic monitoring using thoracic bioimpedance - an optimal solution for the treatment of hypertension. A linguoverted impacted tooth with orocutaneous fistula - a rare case report. Nutritional status and eating disorders among medical students from the Cluj-Napoca University centre.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1