肺动脉高压合并毛细血管后和毛细血管前肺动脉高压患者的特异性治疗。

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2018-03-01 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/7056360
Hassan Alfraidi, Sultan Qanash, Zoheir Bshouty
{"title":"肺动脉高压合并毛细血管后和毛细血管前肺动脉高压患者的特异性治疗。","authors":"Hassan Alfraidi,&nbsp;Sultan Qanash,&nbsp;Zoheir Bshouty","doi":"10.1155/2018/7056360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specific therapy for patients with PAH is associated with good outcomes. Little is known about the effect of this treatment in patients with Cpc-PH (PAPm ≥ 25 mmHg, PAWP > 15 mmHg, DPG ≥ 7 mmHg, and/or PVR > 3 WU). This study evaluates the outcome of treating patients with Cpc-PH using PAH specific therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes were WHO functional class and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients with Cpc-PH (half with VHD and half with HF) received PAHST. Six patients did not tolerate treatment due to pulmonary edema. No predictors for treatment intolerance were identified. In twenty patients who tolerated the treatment, the mean WHO functional class improved from 2.70 ± 0.21 at initial assessment to 2.22 ± 0.21 (<i>p</i> < 0.04) and 2.06 ± 0.21 (<i>p</i> < 0.03) at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Mean 6-MWD improved from 276.0 ± 38.50 meters at initial assessment to 343.9 ± 22.99 meters (<i>p</i> < 0.04) and 364.6 ± 34.85 meters (<i>p</i> = 0.07) at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Twelve patients died during the follow-up period. Mean survival for all patients was 1279.7 ± 193.60 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAHST may be beneficial in the treatment of Cpc-PH (both short and long term). Prospective randomized controlled trials of PAHST in this population are needed to assess its potential efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7056360","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Specific Therapy in Patients with Combined Post- and Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension.\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Alfraidi,&nbsp;Sultan Qanash,&nbsp;Zoheir Bshouty\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/7056360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Specific therapy for patients with PAH is associated with good outcomes. Little is known about the effect of this treatment in patients with Cpc-PH (PAPm ≥ 25 mmHg, PAWP > 15 mmHg, DPG ≥ 7 mmHg, and/or PVR > 3 WU). This study evaluates the outcome of treating patients with Cpc-PH using PAH specific therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes were WHO functional class and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six patients with Cpc-PH (half with VHD and half with HF) received PAHST. Six patients did not tolerate treatment due to pulmonary edema. No predictors for treatment intolerance were identified. In twenty patients who tolerated the treatment, the mean WHO functional class improved from 2.70 ± 0.21 at initial assessment to 2.22 ± 0.21 (<i>p</i> < 0.04) and 2.06 ± 0.21 (<i>p</i> < 0.03) at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Mean 6-MWD improved from 276.0 ± 38.50 meters at initial assessment to 343.9 ± 22.99 meters (<i>p</i> < 0.04) and 364.6 ± 34.85 meters (<i>p</i> = 0.07) at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Twelve patients died during the follow-up period. Mean survival for all patients was 1279.7 ± 193.60 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PAHST may be beneficial in the treatment of Cpc-PH (both short and long term). Prospective randomized controlled trials of PAHST in this population are needed to assess its potential efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/7056360\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7056360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7056360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:PAH患者的特异性治疗与良好的预后相关。对于Cpc-PH (PAPm≥25 mmHg, paap > 15 mmHg, DPG≥7 mmHg,和/或PVR > 3wu)患者,这种治疗的效果知之甚少。本研究评估了使用PAH特异性疗法治疗Cpc-PH患者的结果。方法:主要终点为生存。次要指标为WHO功能分级和6分钟步行距离(6-MWD)。结果:26例Cpc-PH患者(一半合并VHD,一半合并HF)接受了PAHST治疗。6例患者因肺水肿不能耐受治疗。未发现治疗不耐受的预测因素。在20例耐受治疗的患者中,平均who功能等级分别从最初评估时的2.70±0.21提高到6个月和9个月时的2.22±0.21 (p < 0.04)和2.06±0.21 (p < 0.03)。平均6- mwd分别从最初评估时的276.0±38.50米提高到6个月时的343.9±22.99米(p < 0.04)和9个月时的364.6±34.85米(p = 0.07)。12例患者在随访期间死亡。所有患者的平均生存期为1279.7±193.60天。结论:PAHST治疗Cpc-PH(短期和长期)均有疗效。需要在该人群中进行前瞻性随机对照试验来评估其潜在疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Specific Therapy in Patients with Combined Post- and Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension.

Background: Specific therapy for patients with PAH is associated with good outcomes. Little is known about the effect of this treatment in patients with Cpc-PH (PAPm ≥ 25 mmHg, PAWP > 15 mmHg, DPG ≥ 7 mmHg, and/or PVR > 3 WU). This study evaluates the outcome of treating patients with Cpc-PH using PAH specific therapy.

Methods: The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes were WHO functional class and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD).

Results: Twenty-six patients with Cpc-PH (half with VHD and half with HF) received PAHST. Six patients did not tolerate treatment due to pulmonary edema. No predictors for treatment intolerance were identified. In twenty patients who tolerated the treatment, the mean WHO functional class improved from 2.70 ± 0.21 at initial assessment to 2.22 ± 0.21 (p < 0.04) and 2.06 ± 0.21 (p < 0.03) at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Mean 6-MWD improved from 276.0 ± 38.50 meters at initial assessment to 343.9 ± 22.99 meters (p < 0.04) and 364.6 ± 34.85 meters (p = 0.07) at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Twelve patients died during the follow-up period. Mean survival for all patients was 1279.7 ± 193.60 days.

Conclusion: PAHST may be beneficial in the treatment of Cpc-PH (both short and long term). Prospective randomized controlled trials of PAHST in this population are needed to assess its potential efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Practice Variations in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism. The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Children. Dual-Task Performance in Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Establishing the Safety and Efficacy of Bedaquiline-Containing Regimen for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Adherence to the ISHLT Protocol for the Referral of Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis to the Transplantation Center among of Czech Centers for Interstitial Lung Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1