4种治疗方案在2型麻风反应中的比较疗效(泼尼松龙单用、沙利度胺单用、泼尼松龙联合沙利度胺和泼尼松龙联合氯法齐明)。

Q4 Medicine Indian journal of leprosy Pub Date : 2016-01-01
H K Kar, L Gupta
{"title":"4种治疗方案在2型麻风反应中的比较疗效(泼尼松龙单用、沙利度胺单用、泼尼松龙联合沙利度胺和泼尼松龙联合氯法齐明)。","authors":"H K Kar,&nbsp;L Gupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study has been carried out to assess the comparative efficacy of Prednisolone alone or thalidomide alone for the first attack of T2R, and combination of prednisolone plus thalidomide or prednisolone plus clofazimine for chronic and recurrent T2R. Efficacy of all four regimens was assessed on the basis of clinical recovery of T2R measured by reaction severity scores (RSS) ,visual analogue scale (VAS) and other relevant parameters, requirement of extra dose of steroid for clinical recovery, recurrence of T2R and side effects observed in each regimen. The designof study was an open prospective longitudinal single centre investigation. In the first episode T2R group I (prednisolone alone) the efficacy was 58.8% (10/17) compared to 93.75% (15/16) in Group 2 treated with thalidomide alone. This difference was statistically significant p <0.05 when compared using unpaired ttest. When clinical outcome was compared in recurrent/relapse of T2R Groups 3 and 4, it was observed to be statistically significant p<0.05 when compared using unpaired t test. It was 82.35% (14/17) in Group 3 (prednisolone plus clofazimine) and 10/16 (62.5%) in Group 4 (prednislone plus clofazimine). To conclude, for the management of recurrent/chronic ENL, both the combinations-prednisolone with thalidomide or clofazimine appear to be efficacious. While prednisolone with thalidomide appears to be better than prednisolone and clofazimine, however, by 20 weeks difference narrows down. As of now these findings may be considered indicative and larger experience on more number of cases using robust statistical design is required for marchingtowards making recommendations for clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13412,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of leprosy","volume":"88 1","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of four treatment regimens in Type 2 Leprosy Reactions (Prednisolone alone, Thalidomide alone, Prednisolone plus Thalidomide and Prednisolone plus Clofazimine).\",\"authors\":\"H K Kar,&nbsp;L Gupta\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study has been carried out to assess the comparative efficacy of Prednisolone alone or thalidomide alone for the first attack of T2R, and combination of prednisolone plus thalidomide or prednisolone plus clofazimine for chronic and recurrent T2R. Efficacy of all four regimens was assessed on the basis of clinical recovery of T2R measured by reaction severity scores (RSS) ,visual analogue scale (VAS) and other relevant parameters, requirement of extra dose of steroid for clinical recovery, recurrence of T2R and side effects observed in each regimen. The designof study was an open prospective longitudinal single centre investigation. In the first episode T2R group I (prednisolone alone) the efficacy was 58.8% (10/17) compared to 93.75% (15/16) in Group 2 treated with thalidomide alone. This difference was statistically significant p <0.05 when compared using unpaired ttest. When clinical outcome was compared in recurrent/relapse of T2R Groups 3 and 4, it was observed to be statistically significant p<0.05 when compared using unpaired t test. It was 82.35% (14/17) in Group 3 (prednisolone plus clofazimine) and 10/16 (62.5%) in Group 4 (prednislone plus clofazimine). To conclude, for the management of recurrent/chronic ENL, both the combinations-prednisolone with thalidomide or clofazimine appear to be efficacious. While prednisolone with thalidomide appears to be better than prednisolone and clofazimine, however, by 20 weeks difference narrows down. As of now these findings may be considered indicative and larger experience on more number of cases using robust statistical design is required for marchingtowards making recommendations for clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian journal of leprosy\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian journal of leprosy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of leprosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估强的松龙单用或沙利度胺单用治疗T2R首次发作,以及强的松龙联合沙利度胺或强的松龙联合氯法齐明治疗慢性和复发性T2R的比较疗效。根据反应严重程度评分(RSS)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)等相关参数测量T2R的临床恢复情况、临床恢复所需的额外类固醇剂量、T2R复发情况及各方案观察到的不良反应情况,评估四种方案的疗效。研究设计为开放、前瞻性、纵向单中心调查。首发T2R组I(单独使用强的松龙)的疗效为58.8%(10/17),而单独使用沙利度胺组2的疗效为93.75%(15/16)。差异有统计学意义p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative efficacy of four treatment regimens in Type 2 Leprosy Reactions (Prednisolone alone, Thalidomide alone, Prednisolone plus Thalidomide and Prednisolone plus Clofazimine).

This study has been carried out to assess the comparative efficacy of Prednisolone alone or thalidomide alone for the first attack of T2R, and combination of prednisolone plus thalidomide or prednisolone plus clofazimine for chronic and recurrent T2R. Efficacy of all four regimens was assessed on the basis of clinical recovery of T2R measured by reaction severity scores (RSS) ,visual analogue scale (VAS) and other relevant parameters, requirement of extra dose of steroid for clinical recovery, recurrence of T2R and side effects observed in each regimen. The designof study was an open prospective longitudinal single centre investigation. In the first episode T2R group I (prednisolone alone) the efficacy was 58.8% (10/17) compared to 93.75% (15/16) in Group 2 treated with thalidomide alone. This difference was statistically significant p <0.05 when compared using unpaired ttest. When clinical outcome was compared in recurrent/relapse of T2R Groups 3 and 4, it was observed to be statistically significant p<0.05 when compared using unpaired t test. It was 82.35% (14/17) in Group 3 (prednisolone plus clofazimine) and 10/16 (62.5%) in Group 4 (prednislone plus clofazimine). To conclude, for the management of recurrent/chronic ENL, both the combinations-prednisolone with thalidomide or clofazimine appear to be efficacious. While prednisolone with thalidomide appears to be better than prednisolone and clofazimine, however, by 20 weeks difference narrows down. As of now these findings may be considered indicative and larger experience on more number of cases using robust statistical design is required for marchingtowards making recommendations for clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian journal of leprosy
Indian journal of leprosy Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Leprosy is one of the oldest journals of India published quarterly by Hind Kusht Nivaran Sangh (Indian Leprosy Association) since 1929. The Journal covers all research aspects of leprosy, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases.
期刊最新文献
Dapsone: An Update. Erythema Necroticans - A Case Report. A Traditional NSAID Aspirin along with Clofazimine in Erythema Nodosum Leprosum Reaction: Study of Six Cases. A Breast Lump in an Elderly Lady - Carcinoma or else ?. Correlates of Defaulting from MDT among Leprosy Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1