龋齿组织去除的商定术语。

Q2 Dentistry Monographs in Oral Science Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-05-24 DOI:10.1159/000487842
Nicola Innes, Falk Schwendicke, Jo Frencken
{"title":"龋齿组织去除的商定术语。","authors":"Nicola Innes,&nbsp;Falk Schwendicke,&nbsp;Jo Frencken","doi":"10.1159/000487842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the carious process as a biofilm disease rather than an infectious disease has changed lesion management focus towards less invasive options. This has led to new and ongoing changes in recommendations for practitioners. However, the lack of clarity over what to do, and when, is complicated by different teaching, research, and policy documents containing different terms and definitions for carious lesions and management strategies. Lack of clear messages and communication over recommendations hampers moving evidence into practice. The International Caries Consensus Collaboration (ICCC) recommendations on terminology are one part of improving communication for discussing the diagnosis and management of dental caries and dental carious lesions. The term dental caries is the name of the disease, its use being limited to situations involving control of the disease using preventive and noninvasive measures at the patient level. Carious lesion management should be used where management is directly related to disease symptoms at the tooth level. As terminology cannot be used to directly relate the visual appearance of the carious lesion to the histopathology, the terms have been based around the clinical consequences of the disease: soft, leathery, firm and hard dentine. The 3 main carious tissue removal options are described as: (1) selective removal of carious tissue (to both soft and firm dentine), (2) stepwise removal, and (3) non-selective removal to hard dentine (previously known as complete removal and no longer recommended). Use of these terms across clinicians, researchers, dental educators, and even with patients, will help improve understanding and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":"27 ","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000487842","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Agreed Terminology for Carious Tissue Removal.\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Innes,&nbsp;Falk Schwendicke,&nbsp;Jo Frencken\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000487842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the carious process as a biofilm disease rather than an infectious disease has changed lesion management focus towards less invasive options. This has led to new and ongoing changes in recommendations for practitioners. However, the lack of clarity over what to do, and when, is complicated by different teaching, research, and policy documents containing different terms and definitions for carious lesions and management strategies. Lack of clear messages and communication over recommendations hampers moving evidence into practice. The International Caries Consensus Collaboration (ICCC) recommendations on terminology are one part of improving communication for discussing the diagnosis and management of dental caries and dental carious lesions. The term dental caries is the name of the disease, its use being limited to situations involving control of the disease using preventive and noninvasive measures at the patient level. Carious lesion management should be used where management is directly related to disease symptoms at the tooth level. As terminology cannot be used to directly relate the visual appearance of the carious lesion to the histopathology, the terms have been based around the clinical consequences of the disease: soft, leathery, firm and hard dentine. The 3 main carious tissue removal options are described as: (1) selective removal of carious tissue (to both soft and firm dentine), (2) stepwise removal, and (3) non-selective removal to hard dentine (previously known as complete removal and no longer recommended). Use of these terms across clinicians, researchers, dental educators, and even with patients, will help improve understanding and communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"155-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000487842\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000487842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000487842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

将龋齿过程理解为一种生物膜疾病而非感染性疾病,已经改变了病变管理的重点,转向了侵入性较小的选择。这导致了从业人员建议的新的和持续的变化。然而,由于不同的教学、研究和政策文件中包含不同的术语和定义以及龋齿病变和管理策略,因此缺乏明确的措施和时间。缺乏关于建议的明确信息和沟通阻碍了将证据转化为实践。国际龋齿共识合作组织(ICCC)关于术语的建议是改善讨论龋齿和龋齿损害的诊断和管理的沟通的一部分。龋齿一词是一种疾病的名称,它的使用仅限于在患者层面上使用预防性和非侵入性措施来控制疾病的情况。龋齿损伤的处理应在与牙齿水平的疾病症状直接相关的情况下进行。由于术语不能直接用于将龋齿病变的视觉外观与组织病理学联系起来,因此这些术语基于疾病的临床后果:软质,革质,坚固和坚硬的牙本质。三种主要的龋齿组织去除方法被描述为:(1)选择性去除龋齿组织(对软质和硬质都去除),(2)逐步去除,(3)非选择性去除硬质(以前称为完全去除,不再推荐)。在临床医生、研究人员、牙科教育者甚至患者之间使用这些术语,将有助于增进理解和沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Agreed Terminology for Carious Tissue Removal.

Understanding the carious process as a biofilm disease rather than an infectious disease has changed lesion management focus towards less invasive options. This has led to new and ongoing changes in recommendations for practitioners. However, the lack of clarity over what to do, and when, is complicated by different teaching, research, and policy documents containing different terms and definitions for carious lesions and management strategies. Lack of clear messages and communication over recommendations hampers moving evidence into practice. The International Caries Consensus Collaboration (ICCC) recommendations on terminology are one part of improving communication for discussing the diagnosis and management of dental caries and dental carious lesions. The term dental caries is the name of the disease, its use being limited to situations involving control of the disease using preventive and noninvasive measures at the patient level. Carious lesion management should be used where management is directly related to disease symptoms at the tooth level. As terminology cannot be used to directly relate the visual appearance of the carious lesion to the histopathology, the terms have been based around the clinical consequences of the disease: soft, leathery, firm and hard dentine. The 3 main carious tissue removal options are described as: (1) selective removal of carious tissue (to both soft and firm dentine), (2) stepwise removal, and (3) non-selective removal to hard dentine (previously known as complete removal and no longer recommended). Use of these terms across clinicians, researchers, dental educators, and even with patients, will help improve understanding and communication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
期刊最新文献
Chapter 8: Risk Assessment: Considerations for Coronal Caries. Chapter 9.4: Operative Treatment and Monitoring of Coronal Caries in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.3: Current Concepts of Caries Removal in Daily Practice. Chapter 9.1: The Use of Fluorides in the Control of Coronal Caries. Chapter 6: Diagnostic Considerations regarding Coronal Caries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1