与管理式医疗机构签约仍然是执业护士的障碍吗?

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Nursing Economics Pub Date : 2017-03-01
Jennifer Bellot, Brian Valdez, Kristen Altdoerffer, Ylenia Quiaoit, Tanya Bronzell-Wynder, Patrick Cunningham
{"title":"与管理式医疗机构签约仍然是执业护士的障碍吗?","authors":"Jennifer Bellot,&nbsp;Brian Valdez,&nbsp;Kristen Altdoerffer,&nbsp;Ylenia Quiaoit,&nbsp;Tanya Bronzell-Wynder,&nbsp;Patrick Cunningham","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Upon implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), many managed care organizations (MCOs) initially increased their nurse practitioner (NP) contracting. This trend has not continued, potentially frustrating ACA efforts to expand primary care provider capacity. In this study, about 25% of the responding MCOs did not contract with NPs as primary care providers. only 62.5% of respondent MCOs offering Medicaid products reported contracting with NPs as primary care providers, suggesting this will place a disproportionate burden on low-income patients seeking to access care. Findings from this study also have important geographic implications, suggesting the decision to contract with NPs is made individually, not necessarily influenced by the numbers of newly insured or available primary care physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":49725,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Contracting with Managed Care Organizations Remain A Barrier for Nurse Practitioners?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Bellot,&nbsp;Brian Valdez,&nbsp;Kristen Altdoerffer,&nbsp;Ylenia Quiaoit,&nbsp;Tanya Bronzell-Wynder,&nbsp;Patrick Cunningham\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Upon implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), many managed care organizations (MCOs) initially increased their nurse practitioner (NP) contracting. This trend has not continued, potentially frustrating ACA efforts to expand primary care provider capacity. In this study, about 25% of the responding MCOs did not contract with NPs as primary care providers. only 62.5% of respondent MCOs offering Medicaid products reported contracting with NPs as primary care providers, suggesting this will place a disproportionate burden on low-income patients seeking to access care. Findings from this study also have important geographic implications, suggesting the decision to contract with NPs is made individually, not necessarily influenced by the numbers of newly insured or available primary care physicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在实施平价医疗法案(ACA)后,许多管理式医疗组织(MCOs)最初增加了他们的执业护士(NP)合同。这种趋势并没有持续下去,这可能会使ACA扩大初级保健提供者能力的努力受挫。在这项研究中,大约25%的mco没有作为初级保健提供者与NPs签订合同。提供医疗补助产品的受访mcco中,只有62.5%报告与NPs签订了初级保健提供者的合同,这表明这将给寻求获得医疗服务的低收入患者带来不成比例的负担。这项研究的发现也具有重要的地理意义,表明与NPs签约的决定是个人做出的,不一定受到新投保人数或现有初级保健医生数量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does Contracting with Managed Care Organizations Remain A Barrier for Nurse Practitioners?

Upon implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), many managed care organizations (MCOs) initially increased their nurse practitioner (NP) contracting. This trend has not continued, potentially frustrating ACA efforts to expand primary care provider capacity. In this study, about 25% of the responding MCOs did not contract with NPs as primary care providers. only 62.5% of respondent MCOs offering Medicaid products reported contracting with NPs as primary care providers, suggesting this will place a disproportionate burden on low-income patients seeking to access care. Findings from this study also have important geographic implications, suggesting the decision to contract with NPs is made individually, not necessarily influenced by the numbers of newly insured or available primary care physicians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Economics
Nursing Economics 医学-护理
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Nursing Economic$ advances nursing leadership in health care, with a focus on tomorrow, by providing information and thoughtful analyses of current and emerging best practices in health care management, economics, and policymaking. The journal supports nurse leaders and others who are responsible for directing nursing''s impact on health care cost and quality outcomes. The journal is published six times per year.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pediatric concurrent versus standard hospice care. Cost-Effectiveness of Advanced Practice Nurses Compared to Physician-Led Care for Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review. The perspectives of nurse practitioners and physicians on increasing the number of registered nurses in primary care. Enhanced RN Role in Behavioral Health Care: An Untapped Resource. Leveraging National Reports to Transform Ambulatory Care Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1