为共同利益作出医疗保健决定。

Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.) Pub Date : 2016-11-01
Thomas Nairn
{"title":"为共同利益作出医疗保健决定。","authors":"Thomas Nairn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Second Vatican Council developed the church’s classic definition of the common good more than 50 years ago when it described the common good as “the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups, and their individual members, relatively thorough access to their own fulfillment.”¹ This is a theological, and not simply a political, description. As such, it needs a bit of explanation, especially when it comes to \nunderstanding what “access to one’s fulfillment” means in the Catholic theological tradition.</p>","PeriodicalId":79613,"journal":{"name":"Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)","volume":"97 6","pages":"4-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care Decisions for the Common Good.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Nairn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Second Vatican Council developed the church’s classic definition of the common good more than 50 years ago when it described the common good as “the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups, and their individual members, relatively thorough access to their own fulfillment.”¹ This is a theological, and not simply a political, description. As such, it needs a bit of explanation, especially when it comes to \\nunderstanding what “access to one’s fulfillment” means in the Catholic theological tradition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)\",\"volume\":\"97 6\",\"pages\":\"4-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health progress (Saint Louis, Mo.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

五十多年前,梵蒂冈第二次大公会议发展了教会对共同利益的经典定义,当时它将共同利益描述为“社会生活条件的总和,这些条件允许社会团体及其个人成员相对彻底地实现自己的目标。”这是一个神学上的描述,而不仅仅是一个政治上的描述。因此,它需要一点解释,特别是当它涉及到理解天主教神学传统中“获得一个人的实现”的含义时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health Care Decisions for the Common Good.

The Second Vatican Council developed the church’s classic definition of the common good more than 50 years ago when it described the common good as “the sum of those conditions of social life which allow social groups, and their individual members, relatively thorough access to their own fulfillment.”¹ This is a theological, and not simply a political, description. As such, it needs a bit of explanation, especially when it comes to understanding what “access to one’s fulfillment” means in the Catholic theological tradition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sponsors and Board Share Canonical, Civil Missions. An MPJP Contemplates Charism, Calling and the Future. A Sponsor's Identity Is Priestly, Prophetic, Royal. Catholic Identity in New Sponsorship Models. Exploring Legal Models to Preserve Catholicity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1