胎盘膜用于治疗手术源性难治性皮肤窦道:一项初步研究

Eric L. Johnson MD , Georgina M. Michael MSN, RNFA, FNP-BC , Yeabsera G. Tamire BS
{"title":"胎盘膜用于治疗手术源性难治性皮肤窦道:一项初步研究","authors":"Eric L. Johnson MD ,&nbsp;Georgina M. Michael MSN, RNFA, FNP-BC ,&nbsp;Yeabsera G. Tamire BS","doi":"10.1016/j.jccw.2017.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite advances in surgical technique, postoperative complications may lead to refractory cutaneous sinus tracts or tunnels. Negative pressure wound therapy is difficult to apply in longer tracts with a narrow diameter opening and conservative treatment failures ultimately necessitate surgical revisions. The aim of this pilot study was a clinical utility assessment of two different commercial placental membrane products for refractory cutaneous sinus tracts of surgical origin. Patients were treated with viable cryopreserved placental membrane (vCPM, n = 6) or devitalized dehydrated amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM, n = 6). The primary outcome measurement was the proportion of complete sinus tract depth resolution without exudate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week percent reduction in sinus tract probing depth and peri-tract wound surface area, days and number of grafts to resolution, number of wound-related infections, and 1-year recurrence rate for closed sinus tracts. All vCPM patients demonstrated complete sinus tract resolution compared to zero closures in the dHACM group (p = 0.00216). The vCPM group achieved greater percent reduction in probing depth (73.3 ± 21.9 versus −4.4 ± 91.3) and surrounding wound surface area (34.8 ± 86.8 versus −279.3 ± 454.9) at 4 weeks than dHACM. The use of viable intact cryopreserved placental membrane has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes for the treatment for refractory exudative sinus tracts and may be an alternative to repeat surgical intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":90358,"journal":{"name":"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jccw.2017.09.001","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Placental Membranes for Management of Refractory Cutaneous Sinus Tracts of Surgical Origin: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"Eric L. Johnson MD ,&nbsp;Georgina M. Michael MSN, RNFA, FNP-BC ,&nbsp;Yeabsera G. Tamire BS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jccw.2017.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite advances in surgical technique, postoperative complications may lead to refractory cutaneous sinus tracts or tunnels. Negative pressure wound therapy is difficult to apply in longer tracts with a narrow diameter opening and conservative treatment failures ultimately necessitate surgical revisions. The aim of this pilot study was a clinical utility assessment of two different commercial placental membrane products for refractory cutaneous sinus tracts of surgical origin. Patients were treated with viable cryopreserved placental membrane (vCPM, n = 6) or devitalized dehydrated amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM, n = 6). The primary outcome measurement was the proportion of complete sinus tract depth resolution without exudate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week percent reduction in sinus tract probing depth and peri-tract wound surface area, days and number of grafts to resolution, number of wound-related infections, and 1-year recurrence rate for closed sinus tracts. All vCPM patients demonstrated complete sinus tract resolution compared to zero closures in the dHACM group (p = 0.00216). The vCPM group achieved greater percent reduction in probing depth (73.3 ± 21.9 versus −4.4 ± 91.3) and surrounding wound surface area (34.8 ± 86.8 versus −279.3 ± 454.9) at 4 weeks than dHACM. The use of viable intact cryopreserved placental membrane has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes for the treatment for refractory exudative sinus tracts and may be an alternative to repeat surgical intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jccw.2017.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213510317300064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of the American College of Clinical Wound Specialists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213510317300064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尽管手术技术的进步,术后并发症可能导致难治性皮肤窦束或隧道。负压伤口治疗难以应用于较长的束和狭窄的直径开口,保守治疗失败最终需要手术翻修。本初步研究的目的是评估两种不同的商业胎盘膜产品用于手术源性难治性皮肤窦道的临床效用。患者分别接受活的低温保存胎盘膜(vCPM, n = 6)或失活的脱水羊膜/绒毛膜(dHACM, n = 6)治疗。主要观察指标为无渗出物的窦道深度完全溶解比例。次要终点包括4周窦道探探深度和窦道周围创面面积减少的百分比,移植物愈合的天数和数量,伤口相关感染的数量,以及封闭窦道1年的复发率。与dHACM组相比,所有vCPM患者均表现出完全的窦道溶解(p = 0.00216)。与dHACM相比,vCPM组在4周时探测深度(73.3±21.9比- 4.4±91.3)和周围创面面积(34.8±86.8比- 279.3±454.9)减少了更大的百分比。使用可存活的完整低温保存胎盘膜治疗难治性窦性渗出性瘘管已显示出积极的临床效果,可能是重复手术干预的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Placental Membranes for Management of Refractory Cutaneous Sinus Tracts of Surgical Origin: A Pilot Study

Despite advances in surgical technique, postoperative complications may lead to refractory cutaneous sinus tracts or tunnels. Negative pressure wound therapy is difficult to apply in longer tracts with a narrow diameter opening and conservative treatment failures ultimately necessitate surgical revisions. The aim of this pilot study was a clinical utility assessment of two different commercial placental membrane products for refractory cutaneous sinus tracts of surgical origin. Patients were treated with viable cryopreserved placental membrane (vCPM, n = 6) or devitalized dehydrated amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM, n = 6). The primary outcome measurement was the proportion of complete sinus tract depth resolution without exudate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week percent reduction in sinus tract probing depth and peri-tract wound surface area, days and number of grafts to resolution, number of wound-related infections, and 1-year recurrence rate for closed sinus tracts. All vCPM patients demonstrated complete sinus tract resolution compared to zero closures in the dHACM group (p = 0.00216). The vCPM group achieved greater percent reduction in probing depth (73.3 ± 21.9 versus −4.4 ± 91.3) and surrounding wound surface area (34.8 ± 86.8 versus −279.3 ± 454.9) at 4 weeks than dHACM. The use of viable intact cryopreserved placental membrane has demonstrated positive clinical outcomes for the treatment for refractory exudative sinus tracts and may be an alternative to repeat surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Is Treating all Pressure Wound Patients with Vitamins A, C, Zinc and Arginine Justified?∗ Omegaven Improves Skin Morphometric Indices in Diabetic Rat Model Wound Healing Managing Wounds with Exposed Bone and Tendon with an Esterified Hyaluronic Acid Matrix (eHAM): A Literature Review and Personal Experience Breast Cerclage: An Innovative Expedient for Perimammary Dehiscence Healing Skin Perfusion Pressure and Wound Closure Time in Lower Extremity Wounds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1