[经腹直肌鞘阻滞联合持续静脉注射芬太尼用于腹腔镜结肠切除术术后镇痛的回顾性研究]。

Kaori Okamoto, Nobuyasu Komasawa, Haruki Kido, Yusuke Kusaka, Tosbiyuki Sawai, Toshiaki Minami
{"title":"[经腹直肌鞘阻滞联合持续静脉注射芬太尼用于腹腔镜结肠切除术术后镇痛的回顾性研究]。","authors":"Kaori Okamoto,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Komasawa,&nbsp;Haruki Kido,&nbsp;Yusuke Kusaka,&nbsp;Tosbiyuki Sawai,&nbsp;Toshiaki Minami","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided transversus ab- dominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks are peripheral nerve blocks that diminish somatic pain of the abdominal wall and are useful for postoperative analgesia. Here, we retrospectively compared the effi- cacy of ultrasound-guided TAP and RS blocks in com- bination with continuous intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia of laparoscopic colectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ethics committee of our institute ap- proved the study. In our hospital, postoperative analge- sia is performed with continuous intravenous fentanyl administration at three concentrations : 12.5, 18.75, and 31.25 μg · hr⁻¹. TAP and RS blocks were applied using 30-40 ml of 0.19-0.25% ropivacaine. We selected 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy from May to October 2015. We compared the fentanyl only group (F group, n=26) and block combination group (F+B group, n=17). Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test P<0.05 was considered significant Results : Patient characteristics including age, height, body weight, duration of anesthesia, and surgery did not significantly differ between the two groups. The concentration of intravenous fentanyl was significantly lower in the F+B group than in the F group (F group : 19.5±8.4μg · hr⁻¹, F+B group : 14.7?4.9 μg · hr⁻¹, P=0.02). In the present study, TAP and RS blocks significantly reduced the dose of administered fentanyl. - Conclusions : Our findings suggest that a combina- tion of TAP and RS blocks lower the dose of continu- ous intravenous fentanyl needed, and may provide better postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic colec- tomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18254,"journal":{"name":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","volume":"66 1","pages":"73-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis and Rectus Sheath Blocks in Combination with Continuous Intravenous Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia of Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Retrospective Study].\",\"authors\":\"Kaori Okamoto,&nbsp;Nobuyasu Komasawa,&nbsp;Haruki Kido,&nbsp;Yusuke Kusaka,&nbsp;Tosbiyuki Sawai,&nbsp;Toshiaki Minami\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided transversus ab- dominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks are peripheral nerve blocks that diminish somatic pain of the abdominal wall and are useful for postoperative analgesia. Here, we retrospectively compared the effi- cacy of ultrasound-guided TAP and RS blocks in com- bination with continuous intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia of laparoscopic colectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ethics committee of our institute ap- proved the study. In our hospital, postoperative analge- sia is performed with continuous intravenous fentanyl administration at three concentrations : 12.5, 18.75, and 31.25 μg · hr⁻¹. TAP and RS blocks were applied using 30-40 ml of 0.19-0.25% ropivacaine. We selected 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy from May to October 2015. We compared the fentanyl only group (F group, n=26) and block combination group (F+B group, n=17). Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test P<0.05 was considered significant Results : Patient characteristics including age, height, body weight, duration of anesthesia, and surgery did not significantly differ between the two groups. The concentration of intravenous fentanyl was significantly lower in the F+B group than in the F group (F group : 19.5±8.4μg · hr⁻¹, F+B group : 14.7?4.9 μg · hr⁻¹, P=0.02). In the present study, TAP and RS blocks significantly reduced the dose of administered fentanyl. - Conclusions : Our findings suggest that a combina- tion of TAP and RS blocks lower the dose of continu- ous intravenous fentanyl needed, and may provide better postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic colec- tomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"73-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Masui. The Japanese journal of anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声引导下的横断腹肌平面(TAP)和直肌鞘(RS)阻滞是周围神经阻滞,可减轻腹壁的躯体疼痛,有助于术后镇痛。在这里,我们回顾性比较超声引导下TAP和RS阻滞联合持续静脉注射芬太尼用于腹腔镜结肠切除术术后镇痛的效果。方法:本研究经我院伦理委员会批准。在我们医院,术后持续静脉注射三种浓度的芬太尼:12.5、18.75和31.25 μg·hr⁻¹。使用0.19-0.25%罗哌卡因30-40 ml的TAP和RS块。选取2015年5月至10月行腹腔镜结肠切除术的患者43例。比较单纯芬太尼组(F组,n=26)和阻滞联合组(F+B组,n=17)。采用Mann-Whitney U检验P进行统计学分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis and Rectus Sheath Blocks in Combination with Continuous Intravenous Fentanyl for Postoperative Analgesia of Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Retrospective Study].

Background: Ultrasound-guided transversus ab- dominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks are peripheral nerve blocks that diminish somatic pain of the abdominal wall and are useful for postoperative analgesia. Here, we retrospectively compared the effi- cacy of ultrasound-guided TAP and RS blocks in com- bination with continuous intravenous fentanyl for postoperative analgesia of laparoscopic colectomy.

Methods: The ethics committee of our institute ap- proved the study. In our hospital, postoperative analge- sia is performed with continuous intravenous fentanyl administration at three concentrations : 12.5, 18.75, and 31.25 μg · hr⁻¹. TAP and RS blocks were applied using 30-40 ml of 0.19-0.25% ropivacaine. We selected 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy from May to October 2015. We compared the fentanyl only group (F group, n=26) and block combination group (F+B group, n=17). Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test P<0.05 was considered significant Results : Patient characteristics including age, height, body weight, duration of anesthesia, and surgery did not significantly differ between the two groups. The concentration of intravenous fentanyl was significantly lower in the F+B group than in the F group (F group : 19.5±8.4μg · hr⁻¹, F+B group : 14.7?4.9 μg · hr⁻¹, P=0.02). In the present study, TAP and RS blocks significantly reduced the dose of administered fentanyl. - Conclusions : Our findings suggest that a combina- tion of TAP and RS blocks lower the dose of continu- ous intravenous fentanyl needed, and may provide better postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic colec- tomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy]. Point-of-care Lung Ultrasound. Point-of-care Abdominal Ultrasound. Vascular Access and Diagnosis of Venous Thrombosis. The PEAS Protocol, an Airway Ultrasound Technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1