结直肠肝转移瘤切除术后辅助化疗的网络meta分析。

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal Tumors Pub Date : 2018-09-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-25 DOI:10.1159/000490763
Paschalis Gavriilidis, Aurelio Tobias, Robert P Sutcliffe, Daniel Azoulay, Keith J Roberts
{"title":"结直肠肝转移瘤切除术后辅助化疗的网络meta分析。","authors":"Paschalis Gavriilidis,&nbsp;Aurelio Tobias,&nbsp;Robert P Sutcliffe,&nbsp;Daniel Azoulay,&nbsp;Keith J Roberts","doi":"10.1159/000490763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Six principal adjuvant chemotherapy treatments (ACTs) are currently available for patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the optimal ACT, as evaluated by 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as well as by hepatic recurrences and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. The probability of the optimal therapeutic scheme and the mean ranking were estimated for each treatment using network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systemic chemotherapy (SCT) had the best 2-year DFS rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-1.27, 95% prediction interval [PI] = 0.17-3.56, surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] = 73) and the lowest AE rate (estimated SUCRA = 65 and predicted SUCRA = 62). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus SCT had the best 5-year OS rate (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.01, 95% PI = 0.50-1.29) and the lowest hepatic recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56-5.30, 95% PI = 0.61-13.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SCT and HAI plus SCT showed superior efficacy and safety. Clinical trials in homogeneous populations with strict selection criteria are needed to compare these two ACTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45017,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","volume":"5 1-2","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490763","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Meta-Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy following Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Paschalis Gavriilidis,&nbsp;Aurelio Tobias,&nbsp;Robert P Sutcliffe,&nbsp;Daniel Azoulay,&nbsp;Keith J Roberts\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000490763\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Six principal adjuvant chemotherapy treatments (ACTs) are currently available for patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the optimal ACT, as evaluated by 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as well as by hepatic recurrences and adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. The probability of the optimal therapeutic scheme and the mean ranking were estimated for each treatment using network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systemic chemotherapy (SCT) had the best 2-year DFS rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-1.27, 95% prediction interval [PI] = 0.17-3.56, surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] = 73) and the lowest AE rate (estimated SUCRA = 65 and predicted SUCRA = 62). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus SCT had the best 5-year OS rate (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.01, 95% PI = 0.50-1.29) and the lowest hepatic recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56-5.30, 95% PI = 0.61-13.62).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both SCT and HAI plus SCT showed superior efficacy and safety. Clinical trials in homogeneous populations with strict selection criteria are needed to compare these two ACTs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal Tumors\",\"volume\":\"5 1-2\",\"pages\":\"21-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000490763\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal Tumors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490763\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/7/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000490763","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:目前有6种主要的辅助化疗(act)可用于结直肠肝转移切除患者。该荟萃分析旨在确定最佳ACT,通过2年无病生存(DFS)和5年总生存(OS)率以及肝脏复发和不良事件(ae)进行评估。方法:系统检索PubMed、EMBASE、Medline、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar数据库的文献。使用网络荟萃分析估计每种治疗方案的最佳治疗方案的概率和平均排名。结果:全身化疗(SCT)的2年DFS率最高(风险比[HR] = 0.78, 95%可信区间[CI] = 0.48 ~ 1.27, 95%预测区间[PI] = 0.17 ~ 3.56,累积排序区下表面[SUCRA] = 73), AE率最低(估计SUCRA = 65,预测SUCRA = 62)。肝动脉输注(HAI) + SCT具有最佳的5年OS (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.01, 95% PI = 0.50-1.29)和最低的肝脏复发率(优势比= 2.87,95% CI = 1.56-5.30, 95% PI = 0.61-13.62)。结论:SCT与HAI + SCT均具有较好的疗效和安全性。需要在具有严格选择标准的同质人群中进行临床试验来比较这两种ACTs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Network Meta-Analysis of Adjuvant Chemotherapy following Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Objective: Six principal adjuvant chemotherapy treatments (ACTs) are currently available for patients with resected colorectal liver metastases. This meta-analysis was designed to determine the optimal ACT, as evaluated by 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates as well as by hepatic recurrences and adverse events (AEs).

Methods: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was performed. The probability of the optimal therapeutic scheme and the mean ranking were estimated for each treatment using network meta-analysis.

Results: Systemic chemotherapy (SCT) had the best 2-year DFS rate (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48-1.27, 95% prediction interval [PI] = 0.17-3.56, surface under the cumulative ranking area [SUCRA] = 73) and the lowest AE rate (estimated SUCRA = 65 and predicted SUCRA = 62). Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) plus SCT had the best 5-year OS rate (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.64-1.01, 95% PI = 0.50-1.29) and the lowest hepatic recurrence rate (odds ratio = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.56-5.30, 95% PI = 0.61-13.62).

Conclusion: Both SCT and HAI plus SCT showed superior efficacy and safety. Clinical trials in homogeneous populations with strict selection criteria are needed to compare these two ACTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal Tumors
Gastrointestinal Tumors GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Novel Urinary Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk in a Predominantly African American Population: A Case-Control Study. Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers. Association between Serum Zinc Levels and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients with Gastric Cancer. Mixed Neuroendocrine and Non-Neuroendocrine Neoplasm of Pancreas: What Do We Know, What Have We Learnt? Mast Cell Sarcoma of Small Intestine, Early Diagnosis, and Good Prognosis: An Extremely Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1