隐匿不受控制的高血压:患病率和预测因素

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Egyptian Heart Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ehj.2018.10.001
Ghada Youssef , Sherif Nagy , Ahmed El-gengehe , Amr Abdel Aal , Magdy Abdel Hamid
{"title":"隐匿不受控制的高血压:患病率和预测因素","authors":"Ghada Youssef ,&nbsp;Sherif Nagy ,&nbsp;Ahmed El-gengehe ,&nbsp;Amr Abdel Aal ,&nbsp;Magdy Abdel Hamid","doi":"10.1016/j.ehj.2018.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are limited data on ‘masked uncontrolled hypertension’ (MUCH) in patients with treated and apparently well-controlled BP is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To define the prevalence and predictors of MUCH among hypertensive patients with controlled office blood pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred ninety-nine hypertensive patients presented to the specialized hypertension clinics at two University Hospitals. All patients had controlled office blood pressure (less than 140/90 mmHg). Patients were assessed regarding history, clinical examination, and laboratory data. All patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for 24 h, within a week after the index office visit. MUCH was diagnosed if average 24-h ABPM was elevated (systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg) despite controlled clinic BP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-six patients (33.2%) had MUCH according to 24-h ABPM criteria (mean age 53.5 ± 9.3 years, 60.6% men). MUCH was mostly caused by the poor control of nocturnal BP; with the percentage of patients in whom MUCH was solely attributable to an elevated nocturnal BP almost double that due to daytime BP elevation (57.3% vs. 27.1%, P &lt; 0.001). The most common predictors of MUCH were smoking, DM and positive family history of DM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The prevalence of masked suboptimal BP control is high. Office BP monitoring alone is thus inadequate to ascertain optimal BP control because many patients have an elevated nocturnal BP. ABPM is needed to confirm proper BP control, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk profile. Smoking, DM and positive family history of DM were the most common predictors of MUCH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44962,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Heart Journal","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages 369-373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2018.10.001","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Masked uncontrolled hypertension: Prevalence and predictors\",\"authors\":\"Ghada Youssef ,&nbsp;Sherif Nagy ,&nbsp;Ahmed El-gengehe ,&nbsp;Amr Abdel Aal ,&nbsp;Magdy Abdel Hamid\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehj.2018.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There are limited data on ‘masked uncontrolled hypertension’ (MUCH) in patients with treated and apparently well-controlled BP is unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To define the prevalence and predictors of MUCH among hypertensive patients with controlled office blood pressure.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred ninety-nine hypertensive patients presented to the specialized hypertension clinics at two University Hospitals. All patients had controlled office blood pressure (less than 140/90 mmHg). Patients were assessed regarding history, clinical examination, and laboratory data. All patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for 24 h, within a week after the index office visit. MUCH was diagnosed if average 24-h ABPM was elevated (systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg) despite controlled clinic BP.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixty-six patients (33.2%) had MUCH according to 24-h ABPM criteria (mean age 53.5 ± 9.3 years, 60.6% men). MUCH was mostly caused by the poor control of nocturnal BP; with the percentage of patients in whom MUCH was solely attributable to an elevated nocturnal BP almost double that due to daytime BP elevation (57.3% vs. 27.1%, P &lt; 0.001). The most common predictors of MUCH were smoking, DM and positive family history of DM.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The prevalence of masked suboptimal BP control is high. Office BP monitoring alone is thus inadequate to ascertain optimal BP control because many patients have an elevated nocturnal BP. ABPM is needed to confirm proper BP control, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk profile. Smoking, DM and positive family history of DM were the most common predictors of MUCH.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 369-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2018.10.001\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260818301339\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260818301339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:在接受治疗且明显控制良好的BP患者中,关于“隐性未控制高血压”(many)的数据有限,尚不清楚。目的了解血压控制的高血压患者中MUCH的患病率及预测因素。方法199例高血压患者在两所大学附属医院高血压专科门诊就诊。所有患者的办公室血压均得到控制(低于140/90 mmHg)。评估患者的病史、临床检查和实验室数据。所有患者在指数办公室访问后一周内进行24 h的动态血压监测(ABPM)。如果平均24小时ABPM升高(收缩压 ≥ 130 mmHg和/或舒张压 ≥ 80 mmHg),尽管临床血压控制,但诊断为MUCH。结果66例(33.2%)患者符合24 h ABPM标准,平均年龄53.5 ± 9.3 岁,男性占60.6%。多因夜间血压控制不佳所致;其中,仅因夜间血压升高引起MUCH的患者比例几乎是因白天血压升高引起的两倍(57.3% vs. 27.1%, P < 0.001)。吸烟、糖尿病和糖尿病家族史是高血压的最常见预测因素。结论隐蔽性血压控制亚优的患病率较高。因此,仅办公室血压监测不足以确定最佳血压控制,因为许多患者夜间血压升高。需要ABPM确认适当的血压控制,特别是在心血管风险高的患者中。吸烟、糖尿病和糖尿病家族史是最常见的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Masked uncontrolled hypertension: Prevalence and predictors

Background

There are limited data on ‘masked uncontrolled hypertension’ (MUCH) in patients with treated and apparently well-controlled BP is unknown.

Objectives

To define the prevalence and predictors of MUCH among hypertensive patients with controlled office blood pressure.

Methods

One hundred ninety-nine hypertensive patients presented to the specialized hypertension clinics at two University Hospitals. All patients had controlled office blood pressure (less than 140/90 mmHg). Patients were assessed regarding history, clinical examination, and laboratory data. All patients underwent ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) for 24 h, within a week after the index office visit. MUCH was diagnosed if average 24-h ABPM was elevated (systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 80 mmHg) despite controlled clinic BP.

Results

Sixty-six patients (33.2%) had MUCH according to 24-h ABPM criteria (mean age 53.5 ± 9.3 years, 60.6% men). MUCH was mostly caused by the poor control of nocturnal BP; with the percentage of patients in whom MUCH was solely attributable to an elevated nocturnal BP almost double that due to daytime BP elevation (57.3% vs. 27.1%, P < 0.001). The most common predictors of MUCH were smoking, DM and positive family history of DM.

Conclusion

The prevalence of masked suboptimal BP control is high. Office BP monitoring alone is thus inadequate to ascertain optimal BP control because many patients have an elevated nocturnal BP. ABPM is needed to confirm proper BP control, especially in patients with high cardiovascular risk profile. Smoking, DM and positive family history of DM were the most common predictors of MUCH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Heart Journal
Egyptian Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Heart Journal is the official journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology. It is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies and translational investigations. The journal publishes research, review articles, case reports and commentary articles, as well as editorials interpreting and commenting on the research presented. In addition, it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational issues.
期刊最新文献
Renal artery embolism successfully managed by ultrasound enhanced catheter directed thrombolysis Congenital atresia of left main coronary artery Late presenting complete heart block after surgical repair of ventricular septal defect Risk factors for acute coronary syndrome in patients below the age of 40 years Intravascular evaluation of coronary atherosclerotic lesions among Egyptian diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1