1208例替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷比较的临床安全性:真实世界证据

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Egyptian Heart Journal Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ehj.2018.05.002
Viveka Kumar , Vivek Kumar , Kajal Kumari , K.K. Talwar , Divya Prasad , Sunil Agarwal , M.S. Yadav , Hamed Bashir , Suman Jatain , S.K. Gupta
{"title":"1208例替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷比较的临床安全性:真实世界证据","authors":"Viveka Kumar ,&nbsp;Vivek Kumar ,&nbsp;Kajal Kumari ,&nbsp;K.K. Talwar ,&nbsp;Divya Prasad ,&nbsp;Sunil Agarwal ,&nbsp;M.S. Yadav ,&nbsp;Hamed Bashir ,&nbsp;Suman Jatain ,&nbsp;S.K. Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.ehj.2018.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Dual antiplatelet treatment is recommended by current clinical practice guidelines for patients undergoing PCI. The PLATO trial showed superiority of ticagrelor to clopidogrel in reducing the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke without increase in the rate of overall major bleeding in ACS patients. However, real world evidence in Indian patients is limited. The objective of this study is to compare safety profile of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in real world settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>In this single centered retrospective observational study, a total of 1208 serial patient records undergoing PCI (ACS and stable angina patients as well) treated with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel were collected and analyzed to look into in hospital outcomes. We excluded the patient’s data that were incomplete.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total of 1208 patients, 604 patients received ticagrelor and similarly 604 patient received clopidogrel. No significant differences in the rates of major life threatening bleeding and any major bleeding were observed between ticagrelor and clopidogrel group (0.2% (n = 1) vs. 0.7% (n = 4), p = 0.18 and 2.8% (n = 17) vs. 3% (n = 18), p = 0.86 respectively). There was increase in minor bleeding rate with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (21.4% &amp; 13.6%, p = 0.00).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the real world settings, patients undergoing PCI treated with ticagrelor showed similar safety profile compared to clopidogrel but with increase in minor bleeding rate. The observed results were in alignment with PLATO clinical trial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44962,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Heart Journal","volume":"70 4","pages":"Pages 375-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2018.05.002","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical safety profile of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in 1208 patients: Real world evidence\",\"authors\":\"Viveka Kumar ,&nbsp;Vivek Kumar ,&nbsp;Kajal Kumari ,&nbsp;K.K. Talwar ,&nbsp;Divya Prasad ,&nbsp;Sunil Agarwal ,&nbsp;M.S. Yadav ,&nbsp;Hamed Bashir ,&nbsp;Suman Jatain ,&nbsp;S.K. Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehj.2018.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Dual antiplatelet treatment is recommended by current clinical practice guidelines for patients undergoing PCI. The PLATO trial showed superiority of ticagrelor to clopidogrel in reducing the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke without increase in the rate of overall major bleeding in ACS patients. However, real world evidence in Indian patients is limited. The objective of this study is to compare safety profile of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in real world settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>In this single centered retrospective observational study, a total of 1208 serial patient records undergoing PCI (ACS and stable angina patients as well) treated with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel were collected and analyzed to look into in hospital outcomes. We excluded the patient’s data that were incomplete.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total of 1208 patients, 604 patients received ticagrelor and similarly 604 patient received clopidogrel. No significant differences in the rates of major life threatening bleeding and any major bleeding were observed between ticagrelor and clopidogrel group (0.2% (n = 1) vs. 0.7% (n = 4), p = 0.18 and 2.8% (n = 17) vs. 3% (n = 18), p = 0.86 respectively). There was increase in minor bleeding rate with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (21.4% &amp; 13.6%, p = 0.00).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In the real world settings, patients undergoing PCI treated with ticagrelor showed similar safety profile compared to clopidogrel but with increase in minor bleeding rate. The observed results were in alignment with PLATO clinical trial.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Heart Journal\",\"volume\":\"70 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 375-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ehj.2018.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260818300553\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110260818300553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目前的临床实践指南推荐对PCI患者进行双重抗血小板治疗。PLATO试验显示,替格瑞洛在降低ACS患者血管原因、心肌梗死和卒中死亡率方面优于氯吡格雷,而不会增加ACS患者的总大出血率。然而,印度患者的真实世界证据有限。本研究的目的是比较替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷在现实世界中的安全性。方法:在本单中心回顾性观察性研究中,共收集1208例连续接受替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗的PCI患者(ACS和稳定型心绞痛患者)的记录,并对其进行分析,以了解医院预后。我们排除了不完整的患者资料。结果1208例患者中,604例患者使用替格瑞洛,604例患者使用氯吡格雷。率无显著差异的主要威胁生命的出血和任何重大出血ticagrelor之间的观察和氯吡格雷组(0.2% (n = 1)和0.7% (n = 4),p = 2.8%和0.18 (n = 17)和3% (n = 18),p = 0.86分别)。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛的轻微出血率增加了21.4%;13.6%, p = 0.00)。结论在现实世界中,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛接受PCI治疗的患者具有相似的安全性,但轻微出血率增加。观察结果与PLATO临床试验一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical safety profile of ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel in 1208 patients: Real world evidence

Introduction

Dual antiplatelet treatment is recommended by current clinical practice guidelines for patients undergoing PCI. The PLATO trial showed superiority of ticagrelor to clopidogrel in reducing the rate of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke without increase in the rate of overall major bleeding in ACS patients. However, real world evidence in Indian patients is limited. The objective of this study is to compare safety profile of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in real world settings.

Methodology

In this single centered retrospective observational study, a total of 1208 serial patient records undergoing PCI (ACS and stable angina patients as well) treated with Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel were collected and analyzed to look into in hospital outcomes. We excluded the patient’s data that were incomplete.

Results

In total of 1208 patients, 604 patients received ticagrelor and similarly 604 patient received clopidogrel. No significant differences in the rates of major life threatening bleeding and any major bleeding were observed between ticagrelor and clopidogrel group (0.2% (n = 1) vs. 0.7% (n = 4), p = 0.18 and 2.8% (n = 17) vs. 3% (n = 18), p = 0.86 respectively). There was increase in minor bleeding rate with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (21.4% & 13.6%, p = 0.00).

Conclusion

In the real world settings, patients undergoing PCI treated with ticagrelor showed similar safety profile compared to clopidogrel but with increase in minor bleeding rate. The observed results were in alignment with PLATO clinical trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Heart Journal
Egyptian Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Egyptian Heart Journal is the official journal of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology. It is an international journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies and translational investigations. The journal publishes research, review articles, case reports and commentary articles, as well as editorials interpreting and commenting on the research presented. In addition, it provides a forum for the exchange of information on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational issues.
期刊最新文献
Renal artery embolism successfully managed by ultrasound enhanced catheter directed thrombolysis Congenital atresia of left main coronary artery Late presenting complete heart block after surgical repair of ventricular septal defect Risk factors for acute coronary syndrome in patients below the age of 40 years Intravascular evaluation of coronary atherosclerotic lesions among Egyptian diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1